New Hampshire Supreme Court case about ballot-counting machines draws a crowd | David Brooks/The Concord Monitor
An Auburn man, Daniel Richard, representing himself, has argued before the New Hampshire Supreme Court that ballot-counting machines shouldn’t be used at polling places due to a lack of proper legal foundation in the state’s constitution. Richard contends that the use of such machines requires approval in the state constitution and wants their use forbidden, along with alterations to state election laws. He claims that all absentee ballots cast in the state since 1979 are “defective.” Supporters, including those critical of ballot-counting machines, gathered for the oral arguments, while attorneys for the state and Auburn town dispute Richard’s points, noting no evidence of injury due to the machines. Read Article
