Texas discovers more backlogged voter registration records | Natalia Contreras/The Texas Tribune

Just days before the start of early voting, Texas county election officials learned of a new state software error that backlogged approximately 15,000 voter address and name update records submitted through the state’s Texas.gov portal since September 1. Local registrars—already strained from clearing a separate months-long backlog caused by a Department of Public Safety driver’s license portal error—must now rapidly process the delayed records to ensure eligible voters can update their information in time. The Texas Association of County Election Officials strongly criticized the ongoing state-level technical mismanagement of the TEAM voter registration system, noting that the sudden influx creates severe administrative burdens during final pre-election preparations. Read Article

Californians accused of voter fraud react with shock, confusion, anger | Brittny Mejia and Kevin Rector/Los Angeles Times

Federal authorities arrested and charged 28 lawful permanent residents in California with voter registration and naturalization offenses as part of a Department of Justice sweep dubbed “Operation Protect the Vote”. Defendants and their families expressed shock and confusion over the charges, with several stating they had no recollection or intention of registering to vote. While federal prosecutors pointed to the arrests as proof of compromised election systems, California Attorney General Rob Bonta and election experts criticized the high-profile enforcement as a politically motivated scare tactic, noting that the isolated cases represent an infinitesimal fraction of the state’s 23 million registered voters and often stem from administrative errors rather than intentional fraud. Read Article

National: Democrats sue to block Trump administration from usurping states’ authority on elections | Michael Kunzelman/Associated Press

Top Democratic congressional leaders and party committees filed a federal lawsuit in Washington seeking to block the Trump administration from encroaching on state-administered election authorities or intimidating local officials. The legal challenge asks the court to bar federal actions aimed at purging legally registered voters, blocking mail-in ballots, or prosecuting election workers ahead of the midterms, specifically pointing to Justice Department litigation targeting states over noncitizen voter lists. Plaintiffs argue the efforts constitute an unlawful attempt to seize control of state election processes. Read Article

National: America Is About to See What Happens When Voters Turn to AI | Will Oremus/The Atlantic

As tens of millions of voters increasingly turn to generative AI chatbots and search summaries for election information during the midterms, research reveals significant vulnerabilities, including frequent factual inaccuracies, reliance on unreliable or foreign state-run sources, and susceptibility to “sloptimization” tactics by political campaigns. Security researchers have uncovered coordinated networks of suspicious local news-style websites specifically designed to feed biased or fabricated data into AI models, while watchdog reports highlight instances of chatbots inadvertently amplifying foreign deepfakes and disinformation. Read Article

National: Trump Appointees Asked a Federal Cybersecurity Agency to Secretly Acquire a Voting Machine — and Hack It | Andy Mannix and Doug Bock Clark/ProPublica

Political appointees within the Department of Homeland Security directed the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) during Trump’s second term to covertly procure and hack a voting machine without notifying the vendor, alarming career staffers who feared the effort was intended to manufacture pretexts for invalidating unfavorable election results. The initiative ultimately stalled because necessary technical personnel had been laid off under federal workforce reductions, but it underscored a broader pattern of political interference. Investigative findings reveal that the administration has slashed CISA’s workforce by roughly a third, dismantled information-sharing relationships, and published sensitive state election records, leaving state and local election officials largely on their own to secure infrastructure ahead of the midterms. How the Trump Administration Politicized the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency — ProPublica

National: Why reported challenges with touchscreen voting machines don’t signal election rigging | Ali Swenson and Melissa Goldin/Associated Press

As early voting gets underway for the midterm elections, social media reports have surfaced featuring voters—particularly Democrats in states like Texas, Tennessee, South Carolina, Ohio, and Kansas—claiming that touchscreen ballot-marking devices are switching their votes. Election administrators and voting experts emphasize that these anecdotes are almost uniformly the result of unintended touches, screen miscalibration, or minor user error rather than coordinated election rigging. Officials note that all machines undergo pre-election testing and that voters can review their printed ballot records, seek immediate assistance from poll workers, or have screens recalibrated to ensure their selections are accurately recorded. Read Article

National: Blanche won’t rule out DOJ post-election action in a ‘doomsday’ scenario | Ryan J. Reilly and Jane C. Timm/NBC News

Attorney General Todd Blanche stated that while the Justice Department does not intend to improperly interfere with elections, he could not entirely rule out a “doomsday” scenario in which federal intervention might occur regarding vote certification or ballot handling ahead of the midterms. Blanche’s remarks follow recent DOJ litigation targeting states over potential noncitizen voting lists, such as a suit compelling California to review registered voters. Voting experts emphasize that no federal statute authorizes the department to challenge ballots or delay state certification processes. Read Article

National: Trump’s Attacks on Voting Raise Fears He Will Try to Challenge Midterm Results | Zolan Kanno-Youngs/The New York Times

State and local election officials express growing concern that ongoing executive attacks on election integrity are laying the groundwork to contest adverse midterm results. While judicial decisions have repeatedly blocked attempts to directly assert federal authority over state-administered voting, federal departments have intensified efforts to investigate voter rolls, deploy nationwide polling place monitors, and circulate unsubstantiated claims of voting machine vulnerabilities and noncitizen registration. In response, state administrators across party lines are developing contingency plans to defend local election procedures against potential federal overreach or unannounced law enforcement interventions at polling locations. Read Article

National: Election activists press Trump to ban voting machines or even declare martial law if November results are in question | Dion Nissenbaum/Votebeat

A coalition of conservative activists and high-profile Trump allies is pressing the administration to utilize federal emergency powers to restrict or ban electronic voting machines ahead of the midterm elections. Figures including Tina Peters, Cleta Mitchell, and Mike Lindell have petitioned the White House and federal agencies to mandate hand-counted paper ballots, invoke national security declarations over alleged foreign hardware vulnerabilities, or deploy federal agents to polling places. Legal scholars, election officials, and civil rights advocates emphasize that the president lacks the constitutional authority to unilaterally alter state-administered voting methods, noting that courts have repeatedly struck down executive actions attempting to assert federal control over election procedures. Read Article

National: Nine ways the Trump administration could interfere with the midterms | Mike Spector, Linda So, Peter Eisler and Ned Parker/Reuters

A comprehensive survey of more than 50 election administrators, legal scholars, and voting rights experts identified key potential flashpoints where federal authority could test state election autonomy ahead of and following the midterm elections. Key scenarios highlighted include federal seizures of voting equipment or ballots, aggressive deployment of federal election monitors, law enforcement or immigration actions near polling sites, national emergency declarations, and direct pressure to delay certification or refuse to seat state-certified winners in Congress. While the White House maintains its actions aim to bolster election integrity, legal experts emphasize that constitutional division of powers, statutory chain-of-custody safeguards, and robust judicial precedent continue to serve as primary guardrails for state-administered elections. Read Article

National: Experts say the midterms could face challenges, but are less concerned than in the spring | Nathaniel Rakich/Votebeat

President Donald Trump’s rhetoric about voter fraud, attempts to reshape U.S. election law, and efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election have left plenty of people worried that his administration will try to interfere with the 2026 midterm elections. But what threats are worth taking seriously, and what is just doomerism? Pam Smith, the president and CEO of Verified Voting and one of the experts who changed her answer, offered a number of reasons for her reevaluation. She noted that, since the spring, several primaries took place without any armed federal intervention, and several states (such as California) have passed laws to strengthen existing prohibitions on voter intimidation. She added that, paradoxically, the Trump administration’s rhetoric hinting about federal agents at polling places “also has given rise to robust pushback, including several lawsuits seeking to prevent this kind of scenario in advance.” Read Article

National: Many GOP states have imposed new voting rules this year, some mirroring Trump’s midterm proposals | Gary Fields and Julie Carr Smyth/Associated Press

Nearly 40 new voting laws passed in Republican-controlled states are taking effect for the first time this midterm election cycle, with many enacting key elements of stalled federal administration proposals. While federal executive orders and congressional proposals for national voter ID, proof-of-citizenship mandates, and mail-voting restrictions were blocked or delayed, state legislatures in places like New Hampshire, South Dakota, and Ohio have successfully enacted parallel measures. Voting rights advocates and civil rights organizations emphasize that the state-level restrictions mirror federal pressure, introducing swift administrative hurdles and increasing disenfranchisement risks for eligible voters. Read Article

National: Officials see gaps in election communications as AI makes foreign influence easier | David DiMolfetta/Nextgov/FCW

A pull-back from federal foreign-influence tracking initiatives, combined with federal workforce departures, has significantly weakened cross-sector information-sharing channels between government agencies, social media platforms, and non-governmental researchers ahead of the midterm elections. State and local election directors report receiving fewer election-specific intelligence briefings, even as foreign actors leverage advanced artificial intelligence tools to automate, scale, and refine target selection for covert messaging campaigns. While federal officials emphasize that intelligence monitoring and infrastructure support through the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency continue, civil society researchers note that the disbanding or restructuring of key federal interagency task forces has created noticeable gaps in real-time threat coordination. Read Article

National: FBI says election officials were targets of suspicious letters containing ‘unknown substance’ | Jessica Husemann and Dion Nissenbaum/Votebeat

he FBI and U.S. Postal Inspection Service have launched a nationwide investigation into a series of suspicious letters—some containing an unidentified white powder—sent to election offices, U.S. senators, and political organizations across more than a dozen states. While postal authorities intercepted many of the mailings prior to delivery, several state election headquarters experienced temporary evacuations or hazardous material responses before tests confirmed the substances were harmless. State election directors emphasized that the physical intimidation tactics will not disrupt ongoing voting operations or delay administrative preparations ahead of the midterm elections. Read Article

Opinion: Publish the Poll Tapes | Andrew Appel/CITP Blog

For well over 100 years, from before 1900 to into the 21st century, political parties sent volunteers to witness the in-the-precinct results at the close of the polls on election night. They did that just in case there were slip-ups (to put it politely) in the transmission and aggregation of the precinct results into district-wide election results. Before there were computerized voting machines, there were mechanical voting machines that displayed the totals on little odometers that were uncovered at the end of election day, that you had to copy down by hand—those were witnessed too. And before the mechanical machines, people counted paper ballots by hand, in the precinct, and announced the per-precinct totals to witnesses in the polling place. Read Article

Book Review: The Plot to Delete Democracy | Sue Halpern/The New York Review of Books

Chances are you already know some random things about the Silicon Valley technology billionaires who have embraced—and been embraced by—the Trump administration: that, for example, Peter Thiel’s data mining company, Palantir, supplies surveillance software to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, that the recent public stock offering for SpaceX briefly made Elon Musk the world’s first trillionaire, or that the venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, a former Democratic Party stalwart, turned to Trump after he saw, he said, the most successful people sending “their kids to the most politically radical institutions, which teach them how to be America-hating communists.” You may even know that Thiel, in contrast to most of his Silicon Valley peers, supported Trump’s 2016 campaign, or that during the 2024 campaign Musk was Trump’s largest individual donor, giving $239 million to his pro-Trump America PAC and around $50 million to other Trump-aligned groups, or that Andreessen helped staff the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk’s predatory duchy within Trump’s second administration. Government by Silicon Valley | Sue Halpern | The New York Review of Books

Arizona: US Supreme Court turns away Kari Lake lawyer’s challenge to sanctions in Arizona voting machine lawsuit | Sophie Brams/The Hill

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from an attorney sanctioned for filing a frivolous 2022 lawsuit on behalf of former Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake and secretary of state candidate Mark Finchem. The underlying lawsuit, which sought to prohibit electronic voting machines in Maricopa and Pima counties, was dismissed for lack of standing before a federal judge ordered $122,200 in sanctions against Lake’s legal team for making false and misleading statements. By letting the sanction order stand without comment, the high court upheld lower court rulings finding that monetary penalties were necessary to deter attorneys from filing baseless claims that undermine confidence in election infrastructure. Read Article

California threatened by Justice Department over claim of noncitizen voters | Safiyah Riddle and Eric Tucker/Associated Press

The U.S. Department of Justice has threatened California state and local election authorities with emergency federal litigation if they do not review and act within 48 hours on a list of alleged noncitizen voters. Federal officials delivered the flagged names to Los Angeles County on a password-protected thumb drive, demanding that local registrars segregate mail ballots for any individuals whose citizenship cannot be immediately confirmed. California state officials and election clerks pushed back against the demand, calling the 48-hour deadline unreasonable and noting that federal agencies have repeatedly refused to share the underlying methodology or data sources used to generate the list. Read Article

Georgia: Election workers prepare for early voting as talk of DOJ ‘intervention’ leaves advocates unsettled | Maya Homan/Georgia Recorder

As Georgia election administrators complete routine logic and accuracy testing on voting machines, a request from the State Election Board’s executive director for Department of Justice “intervention” has drawn severe criticism from voting rights advocates and congressional lawmakers. The executive director’s letter petitioned federal authorities to compel voting software updates and intervene in state election administration ahead of early voting, prompting advocates to warn against potential federal overreach or poll monitoring. Congressional Democrats condemned the request as an unauthorized attempt to sow public distrust, while local election directors emphasized that rigorous pre-election testing confirms machines are functioning accurately. Read Article

Indiana voters have 4 minutes to cast their ballot | Jillian Ellison/Lafayette Journal & Courier

Under an Indiana statute recodified in 1987 and updated in 2021, voters are legally restricted to four minutes inside a voting booth during general elections. The time limit—increased from two minutes by the state legislature to accommodate longer ballots and complex referendums—is not enforced strictly or via automated timers. Instead, election officials emphasize that poll workers are trained to offer guidance rather than remove voters who exceed the limit, using the statutory threshold primarily as a prompt to check on voters who may need technical assistance or clarification. Read Article

The Lafayette 

Load more