National: Mr. Bot goes to Washington: AI will change American elections, but not in the obvious way | The Economist

The use of AI-generated deepfakes in political campaigns, while raising concerns about manipulation and disinformation, may not have a significant impact on elections, according to experts. Research suggests that most voters are immune to persuasion, whether by fake or truthful news, and tend to view political messages as spam. Moreover, social media is not the primary source of news for many people, and they often distrust any political content they encounter online. While AI-generated deepfakes could influence elections by saturating social media with misleading information, they are more likely to reinforce existing beliefs rather than change minds. However, AI could make spreading such content more cost-effective and sophisticated. Read Article

Opinion: Need Better Election Security? The Feds Can Help. | Derek Bowens and Scott McDonell/Governing

Two local election officials from different parts of the United States emphasize the importance of accessing federal election security resources as they prepare for the 2024 presidential election. They mention that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) designated election infrastructure as critical infrastructure in 2017, allowing DHS’ Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to offer free services and resources to improve election resiliency against cyber and physical threats. These resources include physical security assessments and recommendations. The officials highlight the need for these resources as election officials face security concerns, including threats and incidents. They stress that accessing federal resources can help improve the security of election buildings and support safer and more secure elections. Read Article

Arizona: In court, Trump supporter faces election official he violently threatened | Yvonne Wingett Sanchez/The Washington Post

Clint Hickman, a Republican who serves as chairman of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors in Arizona, endured threats and harassment after certifying Trump’s loss in Arizona in 2020. Mark Rissi, who threatened Hickman and the state’s former attorney general, faced federal prosecutors and was sentenced to 30 months in prison, highlighting how individuals who embraced violence or threats due to election denialism are now facing legal consequences. The case reflects the broader challenges facing democracy and the efforts to deter threats against public officials involved in election processes. Read Article

Arizona: Are ballot envelopes public record? Kari Lake voter challenge to be heard in court | Stacey Barchenger/Arizona Republic

Former Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake has been granted a two-day trial in September to review the signatures of about 1.3 million Maricopa County residents who voted early in the 2020 election. Lake has argued that the signatures on the green affidavit envelopes voters use to return their early ballots are a public record, while the county contends they are not subject to public review. Lake, who lost the race for governor but continues to claim she is the rightful governor and a victim of a rigged election, has used this case to support her baseless election fraud claims. Read Article

Colorado: Georgia indictment shows that alleged crimes in Coffee County were ‘template’ for Mesa County | Quentin Young/Colorado Newsline

The recent indictment of former President Donald Trump and others in Georgia, which alleges a conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election, has ties to Colorado. Colorado’s connection to this alleged conspiracy is revealed through several aspects of the indictment. Specifically, the indictment mentions security breaches involving Dominion Voting Systems equipment, similar to what occurred in Colorado’s Mesa County. Some of the same figures and actors are also involved in both cases. The Georgia indictment highlights a larger conspiracy involving multiple states, underscoring the ongoing threat to democracy as the country approaches the 2024 presidential election. Read Article

Connecticut: ‘Time is not on our side’: Secretary of State expresses urgency in quest for new voting equipment | John Moritz/CT Insider

Connecticut’s plans to modernize its election infrastructure by purchasing over 3,000 new tabulators might not be ready for the 2024 elections unless officials approve borrowing for the machines soon, according to Secretary of the State Stephanie Thomas. A proposed $24.5 million bond package for new equipment and poll worker training, approved by lawmakers in June, awaits final approval from the State Bond Commission. The cancellation of the commission’s August meeting has raised concerns about the timeline, and Thomas hopes to introduce the new machines during the state primary election next August. The current tabulators are outdated and prone to issues, with the planned new models offering enhanced security features and efficiency. Read Article

Georgia: Judge rules for Fulton election workers in Giuliani defamation lawsuit | David Wickert/The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

A federal judge has ruled that Rudy Giuliani is liable in a defamation lawsuit brought by two former Fulton County election workers, affirming the claim that Giuliani defamed election workers Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss when he accused them of committing fraud during the 2020 presidential election. The case will now proceed to trial to determine whether Giuliani should pay damages for spreading false claims. Giuliani has been accused of making willful false statements about the two women, and his refusal to turn over documents in the case resulted in a default judgment against him. This ruling comes as Giuliani, former President Donald Trump, and others face criminal charges related to their efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Read Article

Iowa: Voters in Warren County reject GOP-appointed auditor who posted about 2020 election doubts | Hannah Fingerhut/Associated Press

A Republican-controlled board in an Iowa county appointed David Whipple, a fellow Republican with no experience running elections and who had questioned the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential contest, as county auditor, leading to outrage among local Democrats. In a special election, voters in Warren County overwhelmingly chose Kimberly Sheets, a Democrat who had served in the auditor’s office, over Whipple, indicating a desire for voters to have a say in the candidate for such an important office and a stand against perceived overreach by local government. Read Article

New York Board of Elections warns of impersonators coming to homes | Justin Velasquez/Spectrum News

Republican commissioner Michele Sardo and Democratic commissioner Dustin Czarny of the Onondaga County Board of Elections are united against individuals impersonating their office staff and questioning voters about their registrations, considering it a vile act of fraud. They clarified that such impersonators are likely misunderstanding voter-registration rules, as voter registrations can lapse when people move but aren’t automatically illegal as long as voters aren’t registered in two different counties. The Board of Elections aims to ensure secure and accurate elections and underlined that they never send staff to people’s homes. An investigation is underway, and the New York State Board of Elections urged citizens to report such incidents to local law enforcement. Read Article

North Dakota: Proposed ballot measure looks to overhaul elections, remove voting machines | Jacob Fulton/The Bismarck Tribune

A group of residents in North Dakota has filed a petition with the Secretary of State’s office for a proposed constitutional measure that could lead to significant changes in the state’s electoral process. The proposed changes include replacing voting machines with hand-counted paper ballots and restricting mail-in voting by requiring all mail-in ballots to be received by 8 p.m. on the day before the election. The initiative must gather over 31,000 valid voter signatures to make it onto the ballot, with hopes of inclusion in either the June primary or the November 2024 general election. Read Article

Texas: Harris County Commissioners Court to hold public discussion on elections office transition ahead of November | Jen Rice/Houston Chronicle

Harris County Commissioners Court is preparing for a public discussion about a significant reorganization of elections administration duties ahead of the November election. The reorganization follows the implementation of a new state law that abolishes the Elections Administrator’s office and transfers the responsibility of running elections and voter registration to the Harris County Clerk and Harris County Tax Assessor-Collector. Commissioners Court is also expected to vote on the distribution of elections office staff positions, with 131 positions going to the county clerk’s office and 39 positions to the tax assessor-collector’s office. This transition has been criticized for its lack of transparency, and it comes after a series of challenges and changes in election leadership within Harris County. Read Article

Wisconsin’s nonpartisan elections director has bipartisan support. She may be driven out anyway. | Zach Montellaro/Politico

Wisconsin Republicans are seeking to remove the state’s nonpartisan elections director, Meagan Wolfe, ahead of the upcoming presidential primary, raising concerns about election integrity. The state Senate is holding a hearing to remove Wolfe, with Democrats alleging that Republicans are retaliating against her for decisions made by the Wisconsin Elections Commission in 2020. This highlights the ongoing impact of election misinformation in Wisconsin, a key swing state, even years after former President Donald Trump’s false claims of a stolen election in 2020. Read Article

Wisconsin: Election conspiracists testify at disputed confirmation hearing for Elections Commission administrator | Henry Redman/Wisconsin Examiner

A Wisconsin Senate elections committee hearing on the disputed confirmation of the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) Administrator Meagan Wolfe turned into a platform for election conspiracy theories and attacks against Wolfe. Wolfe’s four-year term expired at the end of June, but the three Democratic appointees on the WEC abstained from voting on her renomination, preventing the vote from receiving the four votes traditionally required for a motion to pass the body. While the dispute is likely to be decided in court, the hearing brought prominent election deniers and conspiracy theorists to testify against Wolfe’s reappointment, with little pushback from the committee chair, Sen. Dan Knodl (R-Germantown). Read Article

National: Violent threats, racist messages: Bipartisan officials call the aftermath of the 2020 election ‘terrifying’ | Sudiksha Kochi/USA Today

Officials from various states have reported receiving threats and facing intimidation from supporters of former President Donald Trump after the 2020 election. For instance, Philadelphia City Commissioner Omar Sabir faced threats and had to change his daily routines due to concerns for his safety. Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers received threats after refusing to reject the 2020 election results, and Republican Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and his family received threats as well. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel also expressed concerns about threats and a plot to overturn the results of the election in her state. These incidents shed light on the consequences of the false claims of election fraud and the pressure campaign that followed the 2020 election. Read Article

Pennsylvania will track voting machine malfunctions under new settlement with election security groups | Carter Walker/Votebeat Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania’s Department of State has settled a lawsuit with election security groups that will require counties to publicly report voting machine malfunctions, potentially becoming the first such initiative in the U.S. This measure is seen as a way to enhance transparency, improve efficiency, and counter election misinformation. The settlement follows a lawsuit by election groups against the state, claiming that some counties adopted flawed voting machines. The settlement agreement also requires better public access to voting equipment examination processes and mandates that three counties using the voting machine in question upgrade to its latest software. The new reporting requirement is set to begin with this November’s municipal election. Read Article

National: Federal judge rejects bids to halt Georgia prosecution of Trump aides over 2020 election | Kyle Cheney and Josh Gerstein/Politico

A federal judge rejected the emergency filings made by former Trump administration officials Mark Meadows and Jeffrey Clark, ensuring that they will face arrest this week. Meadows and Clark, who are charged with former President Donald Trump in a racketeering conspiracy to undermine the results of the 2020 election, had requested the court to prohibit the arrest by a Friday deadline, arguing that their cases should be handled and dismissed by federal courts due to their work for the Trump administration. The judge ruled that state proceedings can continue while the federal court considers whether to shift the case to the federal system. This is part of a broader case by District Attorney Fani Willis to prosecute the 2020 election subversion conspiracy. Read Article

National: In Trump cases, experts say defendant’s rhetoric will be hard to police | Devlin Barrett, Spencer S. Hsu, Isaac Arnsdorf/The Washington Post

The challenge of keeping politics out of a criminal prosecution becomes particularly difficult when politicians are both the alleged perpetrators and the candidates for higher office. In the case of the 2020 election obstruction charges against former President Donald Trump, U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan’s efforts to prevent political influences from affecting the case are met with significant complexities. Trump’s political activity and rhetoric during his candidacy could potentially hinder the fair progression of legal proceedings. Balancing the protection of the judicial process with First Amendment rights and potential voter influence proves to be a challenging endeavor for the judge. Read Article

National: This issue could knock Trump off ballots nationwide. Get ready for it to dominate primary season | David Lauter/Los Angeles Times

Efforts are underway to use Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to bar Donald Trump from running for office, citing his conduct during the Capitol attack. Section 3 disqualifies individuals from office if they’ve engaged in “insurrection.” This provision has been receiving renewed attention as conservative legal scholars argue that Trump’s behavior aligns with its meaning. Liberal legal groups have started researching state laws and working with voters to challenge Trump’s access to the ballot. The challenges are likely to come towards the end of this year and early next year, possibly leading to a Supreme Court showdown, which could significantly disrupt the primary season. Read Article

National: Republicans want the next GOP president to curb election security agency that angered Trump | Laura Gersony/ABC

In preparation for a potential Republican victory in the next U.S. presidential election, an influential group of Republicans, under the initiative called Project 2025 led by the Heritage Foundation think tank, is proposing to scale back the federal government’s oversight of online misinformation. The proposal specifically targets the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), a part of the Department of Homeland Security focused on guarding critical infrastructure, including election systems. Project 2025 recommends ending CISA’s efforts to counter misinformation and disinformation, arguing that the federal government shouldn’t be the “arbiter of truth.” Critics, including some democracy experts, are concerned that such a move could hamper efforts to address false information online and its potential impacts on democracy. Read Article

National: To Protect Elections, Protect Researchers | Center for Democracy and Technology

The Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT) underscores the crucial role that independent election integrity researchers play in identifying and mitigating threats to free and fair elections, including foreign influence operations, domestic disinformation, and cyberattacks on election infrastructure. However, these researchers are facing unprecedented obstacles and attacks, including lawsuits, hostile political actors, limited access to platform data, and platforms’ reduced commitment to online trust and safety. The CDT emphasizes that election integrity researchers are essential for evidence-based policymaking and complement the research conducted by platforms themselves. With the upcoming convergence of major elections globally, the spread of generative AI, and increasing political attacks on researchers’ work, the CDT calls for support and empowerment of these researchers, suggesting actions by funders, governments, and platforms to ensure their ability to combat election disinformation and safeguard democracy. Read Article

Arizona: Cochise County votes no on extending controversial ballot paper security pilot | Jen Fifield/Votebeat Arizona

Cochise County in Arizona has voted against extending a $1 million state grant that would have allowed them to work with Authentix, a company partnered with former state Rep. Mark Finchem, to test security features on ballots, including watermarks and special ink. The decision means that County Recorder David Stevens will only be able to use supplies he had already ordered from another company, Runbeck Election Services, for the pilot testing. Authentix has been linked to Stevens through personal connections, and some residents expressed concerns about the contract, believing it to be unnecessary and potentially tied to political favoritism. This decision follows controversies around the county’s election processes, including disputes over hand-counting ballots and claims of fraud. Read Article

Arizona Supreme Court rules against attorney seeking to void 2022 election | Howard Fischer/Arizona Capitol Times

The Arizona Supreme Court has rejected an attempt to void the results of the entire 2022 election. A Scottsdale attorney, Ryan Heath, had asked the court to order Maricopa County to redo the process used to verify signatures on early ballot envelopes. However, the court ruled that only those involved in the original lawsuit have the legal right to appeal the trial court’s decision and that Heath’s legal relief sought, which is an order to redo the 2022 election or revisit the ballots, is only appropriate when there are no facts in dispute, which is not the case here. Read Article

Georgia Trump indictment invokes justice for election workers | Ella Lee and Rebecca Deitsch/The Hill

The indictment in Georgia covering former President Trump’s efforts to overturn the state’s 2020 election includes references to poll worker Ruby Freeman, who was accused by Trump and his attorney Rudy Giuliani of mishandling ballots and subsequently faced threats. The indictment highlights the harassment campaign against Freeman and her daughter, Shaye Moss, and underscores the impact on individuals beyond just the voters in the state whose will Trump sought to deny. The indictment takes seriously the harassment of election workers and considers the human cost of Trump and his allies’ alleged actions, creating a racial component to the case due to the involvement of white, powerful men intimidating Black women. Read Article

Georgia: Spaulding County approves counting ballots by hand; change pushed by election skeptics | Mark Niesse/The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Conservative election critics in Georgia are advocating for hand-counting ballots as a response to doubts about Dominion voting machines. The hand-counting movement recently gained approval in Spalding County, with local election boards voting to require manual tallies before results from computer-scanned ballots can be certified. However, election experts and officials point out that manual counts are often less accurate and more time-consuming than machine tabulations, and that election procedures should focus on building voter confidence rather than catering to partisan skepticism. The hand-counting initiative is driven by concerns about hacking, manipulation of computer-printed ballots, and programming errors. Read Article

Fury at Michigan officials charged in 2020 false electors scheme: ‘This isn’t who we are’ | Alice Herman/The Guardian

Sixteen Republicans in Michigan, including prominent local politicians, are facing anger, prosecution, and recall for their alleged involvement in signing a false electors certificate for Donald Trump during the 2020 presidential election. The charges, which Michigan’s attorney general announced, have triggered a push for elected officials involved to resign. The accused individuals face felony charges, and their constituents are demanding accountability. This situation highlights the legal and ethical challenges surrounding the actions of these officials, with residents and good government groups calling for consequences in light of their attempt to overturn the election results. Read Article

Michigan: Dispute over documents delays considerations to move election tabulators trial | Kyle Davidson/Michigan Advance

Attorneys Stefanie Lambert Junttila and Matt DePerno, along with former state representative Daire Rendon, are facing charges related to alleged tampering with voting tabulators following the 2020 presidential election. Lambert Junttila has requested to move the trial to Antrim County in Michigan, while Special Prosecutor DJ Hilson has argued that Oakland County Circuit Court is the proper venue due to the crimes being committed there. The judge will consider the request to move the trial in two weeks. The charges involve alleged attempts to access and tamper with voting tabulators in relation to the 2020 election. Read Article

North Carolina governor vetoes election bill, sparking override showdown with GOP supermajority | Hannah Schoenbaum/Associated Press

North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper has vetoed a Republican-backed elections bill that would eliminate a grace period for voting by mail and introduce new provisions for partisan poll observers. The bill, which the governor accused Republicans of using to undermine voting rights for young and nonwhite voters, would make voting harder for certain demographics, potentially impacting their ability to elect Republicans. The governor’s veto comes as both major parties gear up for competitive elections in North Carolina, which is anticipated to be a presidential battleground and home to a closely contested gubernatorial race. Read Article

Texas officials can’t toss mail ballots over ID mistakes, federal judge rules | Cayla Harris/San Antonio Express-News

A federal judge has ruled that a provision of Texas Senate Bill 1, which rejected nearly 40,000 absentee ballot submissions due to errors like mismatched numbers, violates the Civil Rights Act. The court found that these errors are not material in determining whether voters are qualified under Texas law to vote by mail. The decision is seen as a win for Texas voters, especially those who rely on mail-in ballots due to disabilities or age, and is aimed at ensuring that eligible voters’ ballots are not rejected based on minor errors or omissions. This ruling follows concerns about the impact of the law, especially on minority voters, who were 50% more likely to have their mail ballots rejected, according to a study. Read Article

Texas Supreme Court denies Harris County request to run November election and delay state law | Jen Rice/Houston Chronicle

The Texas Supreme Court has denied Harris County’s request for an emergency order that would have allowed the Harris County Elections Administrator’s Office to oversee the upcoming November election. This decision clears the way for Senate Bill 1750, a new state law abolishing the office, to go into effect on September 1. The county had sought an emergency order to delay the law’s implementation while the state’s appeal was pending. The Supreme Court’s decision means that Harris County Clerk Teneshia Hudspeth and the Harris County Tax Assessor-Collector Ann Harris Bennett will be responsible for overseeing the election, which is now just weeks away. Read Article

Wisconsin elections administrator won’t appear before Senate committee | Anya van Wagtendonk/Wisconsin Public Radio

Wisconsin’s top election official, Meagan Wolfe, will not appear before a Senate committee hearing about her future in the job following new guidance from the state Department of Justice. This comes amid an ongoing dispute between the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission and the GOP-led Legislature over Wolfe’s future. A hearing was scheduled to discuss Wolfe’s position, which if attended, could lead to official confirmation proceedings and a potential firing. However, Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul has stated that state law does not allow for such proceedings, allowing Wolfe to remain in her post indefinitely. The situation highlights the legal ambiguity around her tenure and its implications for upcoming elections. Read Article