Wisconsin Republicans propose impeaching top elections official after disputed vote to fire her | CBS

A group of Republican lawmakers in Wisconsin has introduced a resolution to impeach the state’s top elections official, Meagan Wolfe, who is accused by conspiracy theorists of being part of an alleged plot to rig the 2020 election in favor of President Joe Biden. The lawmakers, who have promoted claims of election fraud, criticize Wolfe for decisions made by the bipartisan elections commission, of which she is the nonpartisan administrator. This comes after the GOP-controlled state Senate voted to oust Wolfe last week, a move Democrats argue was illegitimate. Wolfe has maintained that the allegations against her are false and that the facts have been provided for years, while various reviews have affirmed the fairness and accuracy of the 2020 election results in Wisconsin. Read Article

Election experts issue report recommending changes ahead of 2024 | Zach Montellaro/Politico

A panel of prominent election experts has issued a report warning that American democracy is facing significant stress in the lead-up to the 2024 election. The report, which includes 24 policy recommendations, addresses issues stemming from hyperpolarized politics and closely contested elections in the past two decades. Among the suggestions are the implementation of laws safeguarding election officials, ensuring ample and robust voting opportunities, and policies for social media companies to combat election misinformation. The committee emphasizes the need for clear rules and early resolution of election disputes. It also calls for a swift determination on challenges to candidates’ eligibility, such as those regarding former President Donald Trump’s potential candidacy under the 14th Amendment. The report underscores the importance of these measures to prevent public unrest and maintain confidence in the electoral process. Read Article

“Where’s Celia?” An Arizona elections official becomes the target of a virtual manhunt by GOP activists on a public records crusade. | Jen Fifield/Votebeat Arizona

The article details the story of Celia Nabor, a former election official in Maricopa County, Arizona, who faced harassment and threats from a political action committee called We The People AZ Alliance, primarily funded by Patrick Byrne’s The America Project. The PAC employed a strategy of bombarding local election offices with public records requests, using the obtained documents to spread misinformation about elections. Nabor, who oversaw mail-in ballot verification, was falsely accused of aiding election fraud. The surge in such requests has overwhelmed election offices nationwide, straining resources and hampering their ability to combat misinformation. Nabor eventually resigned and faced ongoing harassment, prompting her to relocate for safety. Despite these challenges, the PAC continues to file requests for Nabor’s communications, and legal battles surrounding these requests persist. Read Article

National: 2024 election-related violence among security threats facing US, DHS says | Holmes Lybrand and Kaanita Iyer/CNN

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has released a threat assessment for 2024, identifying potential risks and challenges for the United States. The report highlights concerns over possible violence and foreign influence targeting election infrastructure, processes, and personnel during the 2024 election season. It anticipates that Russia, China, and Iran, with advanced influence campaigns, may employ AI-generated content and disinformation on social media to shape policy outcomes and influence Americans. The DHS also warns of threats from Americans motivated by conspiracy theories and anti-government sentiments, who could aim to disrupt the election by targeting voters, election workers, and government officials, as well as polling stations and vote counting sites. Read Article

National: State election chiefs look to courts to deal with Trump ballot challenges | Nnamdi Egwuonwu and Emma Barnett/NBC

State election officers are cautious about involving themselves in potential challenges to Donald Trump’s eligibility for the 2024 ballot based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars those who engaged in insurrection from holding office. Secretaries of state in New Hampshire, Arizona, Michigan, and Colorado have either faced or anticipate legal disputes over Trump’s eligibility for state ballots in the upcoming Republican primaries. Many election officials are hesitant to weigh in on this matter, with some emphasizing that their offices might not be the appropriate venues for making final determinations on such issues. They argue that candidates’ qualifications are typically decided by the courts after filing for office. Read Article

National: Voting rights activists sound alarms over private tool that could lead to cancelling voter registrations | Fredreka Schouten and Curt Devine/CNN

Voting rights groups are raising concerns over a new tool called EagleAI NETwork, supported by some conservatives, aimed at identifying fraudulent voter registrations. Critics argue that the private software relies on unreliable information and could potentially disenfranchise legitimate voters. The creators of EagleAI NETwork claim it to be a pivotal tool for validating, maintaining, and reviewing election rosters. However, voting rights advocates see this as an extension of the skepticism around election administration that emerged among certain Republicans after Donald Trump’s 2020 election loss. They fear that the data used by EagleAI NETwork may not contain enough identifying details, potentially leading to the removal of valid voters from the rolls. The software is being promoted as an alternative to the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), which has been criticized by Trump and conservative activists. While EagleAI NETwork has made pitches to officials in various states, none have confirmed plans to use it, and it could potentially be exploited for mass voter registration challenges ahead of the 2024 election. Critics emphasize that such challenges could burden voters and election officials alike. Read Article

National: The U.S is getting hacked. So the Pentagon is overhauling its approach to cyber. | Maggie Miller and Lara Seligman/Politico

The Defense Department’s secretive branch, U.S. Cyber Command, is shifting its approach due to the evolving landscape of cyberwarfare. Recent high-profile cyberattacks from Russia, China, and criminal networks have prompted a realization that collaboration is now imperative. Cybercriminals are increasingly targeting private companies and government agencies beyond the Pentagon’s typical scope. Consequently, the Defense Department is engaging with other federal agencies, private sectors, and foreign allies to address cyber threats to critical systems, including elections. This shift marks a departure from the previous focus on protecting military networks, as the Pentagon recognizes the need to defend against a broader range of cyber threats, including ransomware attacks on private businesses crucial to the U.S. economy. Read Article

Arizona: Federal Judge blocks state from enforcing law regulating who can vote for president | Howard Fischer/Arizona Capitol Times

A federal judge in Arizona has ruled that the state cannot enforce a 2022 law regulating who can vote for president. U.S. District Court Judge Susan Bolton declared that Arizonans using a federal voter registration form have the right to cast a ballot in presidential elections, invalidating portions of the law requiring “satisfactory evidence of citizenship” to vote in such elections. Additionally, the judge struck down a provision preventing those using the federal form from voting by mail. However, final judgment on other changes in state voter registration laws will be determined after a full trial. The ruling effectively overturns efforts by GOP lawmakers to restrict presidential voting eligibility ahead of the 2024 election. While state law mandates proof of citizenship for voting in local and state races, federal law allows a sworn statement of citizenship for voting in federal elections, including presidential ones, according to the National Voter Registration Act. Read Article

Arkansas: Pulaski County circuit judge tosses out lawsuit challenging state’s voting machines | John Lynch/Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

A lawsuit challenging the legality of Arkansas’ ballot-counting machines has been dismissed after the plaintiff’s attorney couldn’t demonstrate that the system ever misrepresented a vote. The case revolved around whether the bar code-based system allows voters to independently verify their selections before casting their ballots, as required by Arkansas law. The judge ruled that the system does provide this opportunity, as voters receive printed ballots reflecting their choices after making selections from the computer system. The plaintiff’s argument that the system has flaws or vulnerabilities unrelated to the verification process was not considered relevant to the case. Read Article

California lawmakers vote to limit when local election officials can count ballots by hand | Adam Beam and Christina A. Cassidy/Associated Press

California lawmakers have voted to restrict the circumstances under which local governments can conduct hand counts of election ballots, a move primarily aimed at Shasta County. The county’s conservative-majority board of supervisors decided to terminate its contract with Dominion Voting Systems, citing loss of public confidence in the machines. The recent legislation limits hand counts to specific situations, such as regularly scheduled elections with fewer than 1,000 registered voters or special elections with fewer than 5,000 eligible voters. Critics argue that hand counts are resource-intensive and less precise compared to electronic tabulation. Read Article

California: Shasta County supervisors to vote on suing state over voting law prohibiting hand counting ballots in most elections | Damon Arthur/Redding Record Searchlight

The Shasta County Board of Supervisors is considering suing the state of California over a recently passed bill, Assembly Bill 969, that would prohibit hand counting ballots in most elections. The board argues that if the bill is signed into law, it would violate the state constitution by being illegally approved as an urgency measure, and it would also strip local control from the Shasta County supervisors. The bill, authored by Assemblywoman Gail Pellerin, would mandate the use of voting machines for ballot counting, except in elections with fewer than 1,000 registered voters. Shasta County, with over 110,000 registered voters, would be affected by this change. The bill also requires counties to have a transition plan and a replacement contract in place before terminating an existing voting system contract. While some supervisors support the potential lawsuit, others believe the funds could be better used elsewhere. Registrar of Voters Cathy Darling Allen supports the bill, emphasizing the importance of using certified and qualified voting systems for tabulating results. Read Article

Connecticut advocacy groups push Governor to fund new voting machines | Andrew Brown/CT Miror

A coalition of advocacy organizations, including the ACLU, League of Women Voters, AARP, Common Cause CT, Safe Vote CT, and others, is urging Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont to authorize funding for new voting equipment ahead of the 2024 presidential election. This call for action follows malfunctions and issues with the state’s existing ballot tabulators, which were first used in 2006 and 2007. The state legislature has passed a bill to borrow more than $25 million to replace the aging equipment, but Lamont and the State Bond Commission need to vote to officially allocate the funds. The coalition is concerned that delays in securing new tabulators could jeopardize voting accessibility and election integrity. Read Article

Michigan: Threatening election workers could soon be felony | Ben Orner/mlive.com

Michigan State Rep. Kara Hope is advocating for legislation, House Bills 4129 and 4130, aimed at safeguarding election workers from harassment and intimidation. These bills, which have gained momentum with Democrats holding a majority in both legislative chambers, propose making it a felony to intimidate or obstruct the duties of election officials, with penalties including up to five years in prison or a fine of up to $1,000. The legislation, motivated by concerns over increasing political tensions and threats against election workers, is viewed as crucial for the smooth operation of elections. Read Article

Nevada: Election regulations again draw GOP pushback; allow hand counting, with limits | Sean Golonka/The Nevada Independent

The Nevada Secretary of State’s office is in the process of updating and adopting regulations for the upcoming presidential primary elections. These regulations cover various technical aspects of election administration and are aligned with state election laws passed in the last legislative session. They establish timelines for pre- and post-election procedures and provide clarity for election officials and the public on how elections are conducted. While the process is routine, it has become a platform for Nevada Republicans to express concerns about the state’s election laws. Some argue that these regulations represent an “election law power grab,” while others criticize the state’s mail ballot laws and the requirement for a presidential preference primary for each major party. The regulations will need approval from the Legislative Commission before taking effect. Read Article

New York City pension funds and state of Oregon sue Fox over 2020 election coverage | Associated Press

New York City’s pension funds and the state of Oregon have filed a lawsuit against Fox Corporation, alleging that the company allowed Fox News to broadcast false information about the 2020 election, resulting in harm to investors and making the network vulnerable to defamation lawsuits. The complaint, filed in Delaware, accuses Fox of amplifying conspiracy theories about the election, leading to a settlement of nearly $800 million with Dominion Voting Systems. The suit contends that Fox’s board prioritized airing former President Donald Trump’s election falsehoods to appease his supporters, knowing it could lead to legal repercussions. The complaint does not specify the damages sought, but it highlights the board’s disregard for journalistic standards and failure to implement safeguards against defamation litigation. Read Article

Pennsylvania: US Supreme Court won’t intervene in dispute over access to voting equipment after 2020 election | Ariane de Vogue and Zachary Cohen/CNN

The Supreme Court has declined an emergency request from Republican election officials in a Pennsylvania county regarding sanctions related to a dispute over voting equipment and the 2020 election. The case centers on actions taken by two of the three Fulton County Commissioners who sought an examination of Dominion voting equipment by a third party after the 2020 election. They claimed it was to decide whether to continue using the machines. Multiple unauthorized outside firms gained access to the voting systems in Fulton County, which was later deemed improper. The Supreme Court’s decision upholds the sanctions imposed by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Read Article

Texas: What’s at stake in the long-awaited trial over sweeping 2021 elections law | Natalia Contreras/The Texas Tribune

The trial for the legal challenge against Texas Republicans’ voting and election law overhaul, known as Senate Bill 1, began in federal court in San Antonio. More than 20 state and national organizations have brought lawsuits against the law, claiming it violates federal laws including the Voting Rights Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, and constitutional amendments. The law, passed in 2021, faced criticism from Democrats who argued it was based on unfounded voter fraud claims. Plaintiffs argue that certain provisions of the law make it more difficult for voters of color to cast their ballots, with some alleging this effect was intentional. The trial is expected to last until late October, with a decision possibly coming months later. The case could potentially impact elections and voting in 2024, though appeals could prolong the process. Read Article

Wisconsin Senate Republicans fire elections chief Meagan Wolfe, setting the stage for a legal fight heading into the 2024 elections | Molly Beck/Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

In a party-line vote, Senate Republicans in Wisconsin voted to remove the state’s top election official, Meagan Wolfe, from her position as the administrator of the Wisconsin Elections Commission. This decision has ignited a legal battle over the authority to oversee voting in the state as the 2024 presidential election approaches. The move follows lingering outrage within the GOP over the 2020 election and a baseless campaign by former President Donald Trump to undermine its legitimacy. Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul has filed a lawsuit to block the removal, while Wolfe plans to stay in her position pending court decisions. Critics argue that this move is relitigating the 2020 election and may undermine faith in the electoral system. Read Article

Online voting is insecure but many Americans still vote that way | Miles Parks/NPR

The advice from cybersecurity experts is unanimous: Internet voting is a bad idea. A working group at UC Berkeley, funded by Bradley Tusk, Uber’s first political adviser, aimed to establish baseline standards for safe online ballot returns but concluded that secure internet voting remains unattainable. Despite this, internet voting was already used by over 300,000 Americans in the 2020 elections, primarily overseas and military voters. While the option is limited, it’s slowly expanding, driven in part by lawsuits advocating for accessibility for voters with disabilities. Critics emphasize the inherent risks, while proponents argue for improved security measures. Read Article

Opinion: Paper ballots are good, but accurately hand-counting them all is next to impossible | Barry C. Burden/The Conversation

There’s a growing movement, mainly among Republicans, to return to hand-counting ballots in the United States, fueled by suspicions of the 2020 election results. However, this approach, while appealing for transparency and accountability, has significant drawbacks. Hand-counting is slower and less accurate than machine tabulation, as it’s time-consuming, especially with ballots containing multiple contests, and prone to human error. Machine-counting systems, like optical scanners, are faster and more accurate, offering detailed data that demonstrates their superiority. While hand counts can play a role in post-election audits or close recount scenarios, they are not suitable for widespread adoption in modern elections due to speed and accuracy concerns. Read Article

Wisconsin enate elections committee votes against keeping elections chief Meagan Wolfe | Molly Beck/Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Republicans in control of the Wisconsin state Legislature have taken a step towards removing the state’s top election official, Meagan Wolfe, in a move that has sparked a legal battle. The Senate Committee on Shared Revenue, Elections, and Consumer Protection voted 3-1 against Wolfe’s reappointment, a decision contested by Democrats and deemed legally dubious by the Democratic Attorney General and nonpartisan attorneys. The dispute stems from a failure to secure enough votes to reappoint Wolfe in June, with Democrats citing a recent Supreme Court ruling that allows appointed officers to remain in their positions until they are removed. Republican leaders, under pressure from the base over the 2020 election, continue to push for Wolfe’s removal. The full state Senate could vote on her firing as early as Thursday, though even if passed, legal challenges are expected. Read Article

National: AI that alters voice and imagery in political ads will require disclosure on Google and YouTube | Michelle Chapman/Associated Press

Google has announced that political ads using artificial intelligence (AI) to alter imagery or sounds must now include a prominent disclosure indicating that the content has been synthetically altered. This rule, starting in mid-November, aims to combat the potential spread of manipulated or misleading information in political advertising. The new requirement will apply to political ads on Google platforms, including YouTube, and third-party websites within Google’s ad display network. While Google is not outright banning the use of AI in political advertising, this move is expected to influence other platforms to adopt similar measures. Read Article

National: Special counsel election probe continues with focus on fundraising, voting equipment breaches | Zachary Cohen and Paula Reid/CNN

Special counsel Jack Smith is continuing his investigation into efforts to overturn the 2020 election, focusing on how money raised from baseless claims of voter fraud was used to fund attempts to breach voting equipment in several states won by Joe Biden. Recent interviews with witnesses indicate that prosecutors are particularly interested in the role of former Trump lawyer Sidney Powell, whose nonprofit, Defending the Republic, hired forensics firms that accessed voting equipment in swing states. This investigation raises the possibility that others could still face legal consequences, and it remains unclear how it fits into Smith’s broader probe. Powell is already facing criminal charges in Georgia related to her alleged involvement in a multi-state plot to illegally access voting systems after the 2020 election. Read Article

National: Secretaries of state get ready for possible challenges to Trump’s ballot access | Vaughn Hillyard/NBC

Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes and New Hampshire Secretary of State David Scanlan are grappling with potential legal challenges to former President Donald Trump’s eligibility to appear on the 2024 ballot. The issue revolves around the 14th Amendment, which bars individuals who have “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” from holding public office. The question of whether Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021, qualify under this clause has gained attention among legal scholars, and state election officials are preparing to address any challenges while ensuring a smooth election process. Both Fontes and Scanlan emphasize that their primary goal is to run the elections efficiently while handling any legal matters that arise. Read Article

National: Constitutional debate over Trump’s eligibility to run more extensive than realized | Zach Montellaro/Politico

Election officials in several states, including Colorado, Arizona, Michigan, and New Hampshire, have been contemplating the application of the 14th Amendment’s “insurrection clause” to potentially bar former President Donald Trump from seeking the presidency again. The legal theory argues that Trump’s actions post-oath of office could disqualify him. While some officials, like Georgia’s Brad Raffensperger, believe they lack the authority to make this determination, the liberal watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) has filed a lawsuit in Colorado to declare Trump ineligible, marking one of the first lawsuits on this matter. Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, who supports the lawsuit, emphasizes the unprecedented nature of this situation and the need for legal resolution regarding ballot access. Other organizations are also urging secretaries of state to disqualify Trump, with Free Speech for People and Mi Familia Vota Education Fund sending letters to officials in nine states, including Georgia and Michigan, in July. Read Article

National: TechScape: As the US election campaign heats up, so could the market for misinformation | Kari Paul/The Guardian

Twitter, now rebranded as X, has reversed its global ban on political advertising since 2019, raising concerns about the potential spread of misinformation ahead of the 2024 elections. This shift in policy is attributed to Elon Musk’s push for profitability and his identification as a “free speech absolutist.” Musk’s decisions, including the lifting of bans on accounts like Donald Trump’s, have sparked alarm among experts, who worry that these policy changes, coupled with workforce reductions, could hamper the platform’s ability to combat misinformation. Other platforms like YouTube and Meta have also made policy reversals regarding election integrity and the reinstatement of accounts spreading misinformation, potentially creating an environment ripe for misinformation wars. Additionally, the rise of generative AI poses a new risk for manipulating public perception on a large scale. Read Article

Voting Blogs: EagleAI – A New Antidemocracy Tool | Andrew Garber and Alice Clapman/Brennan Center for Justice

EagleAI NETwork, a new project supported by prominent election deniers, including Jason Frazier and Cleta Mitchell, is raising concerns about its potential to undermine voting rights and elections. EagleAI relies on a database of public voter data to identify potentially ineligible voters using unreliable criteria, such as matching names on voter lists with change-of-address forms or felony convictions, or even nursing home registrations, which can potentially disenfranchise voters. It allows amateur investigators to auto-prepare challenge forms, making it a clearinghouse for mass voter challenges, which, when based on unreliable data, often disrupt election administration, intimidate voters, and fuel election misinformation. The project’s backers are pushing to replace responsible voter list maintenance tools like the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) with EagleAI, posing risks to accurate voter rolls and potentially enabling more election misinformation. Read Article

Arizona: Judge questions legality of method used for verifying ballot signatures | Howard Fischer/Tucson Daily Star

A judge in Yavapai County, Arizona, has stated that the practice used by counties in the state to verify signatures on early ballots may be illegal. The judge emphasized that state law is “clear and unambiguous” in requiring election officials to compare the signature on a ballot envelope with the voter’s registration record, which consists of the document signed at the time of initial registration and subsequent changes such as party affiliation. This would make it illegal to use other documents for signature verification. The judge’s ruling came in response to a lawsuit challenging the practice, filed by two groups, and while a final order has not yet been issued, the judge’s decision to not dismiss the case indicates that the issue will be further litigated. The lawsuit targets Secretary of State Adrian Fontes’ efforts to allow comparison of signatures against additional documents, a practice currently in widespread use. Read Article

Arkansas isn’t ditching voting machines for paper ballots, despite claims online | Philip Marcelo/Associated Press

Claims circulating on social media that Arkansas is transitioning from voting machines to hand countedpaper ballots are false. Arkansas officials, including the Secretary of State’s office, have stated that there has been no statewide change in how voters cast their ballots, and most counties will continue to use voting machines. While one rural county, Searcy County, has approved a plan to start using paper ballots filled in by hand, a final vote on this decision is still pending. Additionally, Cleburne County briefly considered a similar switch but later rescinded the decision. A new law in Arkansas requires counties using hand-marked paper ballots to first tally the ballots by machine for initial results, with the option to conduct a hand count for official results later. Any additional expenses incurred by counties for hand counting will not be reimbursed by the state. Read Article

California State Senate Passes AB 969, Even as Costs of Shasta County’s Manual Tally of Election Ballots Continue to Rise | George Winship/anewscafe.com

The California State Senate has approved Assembly Bill 969, which places restrictions on certain voting jurisdictions, including Shasta County, preventing them from terminating voting system contracts and resorting to manual vote counting except in specific circumstances. This legislation is designed to safeguard the use of automated voting systems and curb the adoption of manual counting in these jurisdictions. Concerns highlighted include the rising expenses associated with manual ballot counts, which can become substantial. The bill will now return to the Assembly for consideration of Senate amendments before reaching the governor’s desk for final approval. Read Article