Texas has decided to withdraw from the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), a bipartisan voter integrity group that maintains accurate voter rolls. The state cited rising membership costs due to declining enrollment and a new state law requiring alternatives for crosschecking voter lists as reasons for the decision. ERIC, which helps prevent duplicate voter registrations…
Election workers across the United States, including those in King County, are facing unprecedented levels of intimidation, with reported threats and harassment causing some workers to leave their jobs. The rise of misinformation since 2020 has contributed to this hostile environment, leading election administrators to take enhanced safety measures for the 2024 presidential election. In…
Meagan Wolfe, the administrator of the Wisconsin Elections Commission, was interviewed by federal authorities investigating former President Donald Trump’s efforts to subvert the 2020 election leading up to the January 6, 2021 Capitol insurrection. Wolfe’s interview was part of the ongoing probe conducted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, who is gathering information from officials in battleground states where Trump’s attempts to overturn his election loss were most intense. The investigation aims to understand the events surrounding the insurrection and disinformation campaigns about Wisconsin’s election system that led to unsuccessful Republican efforts to implement new voting restrictions and dismantle the state elections agency. Trump confirmed he is a target of the investigation, and Smith has given him a week to appear before a grand jury. Reasd Article
Republican lawmakers in Wisconsin have introduced a bill that would require watermarks on absentee ballots, citing the need to curb public distrust in absentee ballots and restore trust in the election process. However, election clerks argue that the measure would create more problems without solving any. They note that watermarked ballots would pose challenges such as determining the number of watermarked ballots to purchase, ensuring accurate counting by machines, and potential recount and audit problems. Clerks also point out that watermarks could interfere with machine reading and that photocopies of watermarked ballots can still be made. Another bill with bipartisan support is also being considered, which would require military voters to provide their Department of Defense number when requesting an absentee ballot. Election clerks generally support this measure as it adds an additional level of security without significant issues. Read Article
Election officials in the United States are concerned that upcoming changes to voting machine certification guidelines by the federal government will be exploited to spread misinformation and undermine trust in the 2024 election. After enduring contentious election cycles in recent years, officials fear that false information about the consequences of the changes will circulate, much like the conspiracy theories surrounding the security of voting machines after the 2020 election. The new standards, aimed at improving cybersecurity and accessibility, will be implemented in November 2023, just before the presidential election, leading officials to worry that public scrutiny and misinterpretation of the guidelines may erode public confidence in the electoral process. Read Article
Secretaries of State are bracing themselves for election disinformation campaigns during the 2024 presidential race that are expected to be amplified by artificial intelligence (AI), according to discussions at the National Association of Secretaries of State Conference. They anticipate the spread of deepfakes and other AI-generated content designed to deceive voters. Several states are enacting laws to require the disclosure of deepfakes in political ads, while others believe social media companies should assume more responsibility for AI-generated content. Educating voters and providing transparency in the election process are key priorities for officials in countering disinformation. Read Article
A federal judge’s ruling that restricts the government’s communication with social media platforms could hinder efforts to curb harmful content, according to researchers and groups combating hate speech and disinformation. The ruling, which followed lawsuits accusing Facebook and Twitter of censoring right-leaning content, prevents government agencies from urging the removal of protected free speech. Researchers argue that the government should be able to inform social media companies about harmful content without coercing them to remove it, and they expressed concerns about a potential chilling effect on disinformation research and the ability to combat misinformation before the 2024 election. Read Article
Last week’s court injunction limiting government communication with tech companies is undermining efforts to combat election interference, with reduced content moderation, decreased research on disinformation, and a pause in government communications with Silicon Valley. The ruling comes as tech companies face new threats from AI-generated fake content and civil rights groups warn of increased election lies. The injunction highlights the ongoing partisan battle over social media rules, hindering academic research and impacting conversations among tech companies about disinformation. The focus on government communication overlooks tech companies’ moderation shortcomings, while the release of new products further challenges the ability to adapt to evolving threats. Read Article
The House Administration Committee voted 8-4 to advance the American Confidence in Elections Act, a conservative election package, despite strong opposition from Democrats. Democrats argue that the bill seeks to disenfranchise voters of color, protect wealthy donors, and undermine the self-governance of Washington, D.C. The bill includes measures such as urging states to adopt voter ID requirements, overriding certain D.C. election laws, prohibiting federal funds to states allowing noncitizen voting or ballot harvesting, and restricting federal agencies from accessing conservative nonprofits. Only one Democratic amendment was approved out of nearly 50, while the Democratic alternative bill failed to pass. The fate of the bill is uncertain in the Democrat-controlled Senate. Read Article
A federal judge has issued a ruling barring certain federal government officials from contacting social media platforms to discourage or remove content protected by the First Amendment. The decision restricts officials from agencies including the White House, Health and Human Services, and the FBI from engaging with social media companies over conservative opinions that were allegedly suppressed. The judge’s ruling has been seen as a victory for Republicans who accuse the government of censorship, while Democrats argue that social media platforms have failed to address misinformation. The Biden administration is reviewing the ruling, and it could be appealed to a higher court. Read Articlep
Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has reportedly made cuts to its teams responsible for tackling disinformation and coordinated troll and harassment campaigns on its platforms. Concerns have been raised about the impact of these cuts on efforts to counter false information ahead of the 2024 elections in the US and globally. The layoffs have affected members of the team working on Meta’s election integrity initiatives, including content review specialists who manually review election-related posts. The reductions in personnel may result in some deceptive efforts going unnoticed, while the use of Meta’s new Threads platform by bad actors has raised further concerns. Read Article
Several Republican-led states that left the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), a nonpartisan program designed to maintain accurate voter rolls, are now scrambling to find alternatives to catch “double voters” ahead of the 2024 presidential election. Ohio, one of the states that left ERIC, has been convening leaders from multiple states to discuss ways to work together and fill the security gap left by exiting the program. Elections officials are facing ongoing scrutiny about the accuracy of voter rolls and are seeking solutions to address accusations of fraud. The new effort being discussed would involve individual states signing data sharing agreements with one another, but it would lack the centralized database structure of ERIC, making tasks like updating voter rolls more challenging. The future of ERIC itself is also uncertain, as more states consider leaving the program. Read Article
Conservative television host Tucker Carlson is facing a potential defamation lawsuit from Ray Epps, an Arizona man accused by Carlson of being a covert government agent involved in inciting the January 6 Capitol assault. Epps, who participated in demonstrations on that day but never entered the Capitol, has not been charged with a crime. Lawyers representing Epps and his wife are planning to sue Fox News, arguing that Carlson’s repeated false statements about Epps have harmed his reputation. The potential lawsuit adds to Fox News’ legal troubles related to false claims about the 2020 election and workplace toxicity allegations. Read Article
Maricopa County is participating in a pilot program to test its electronic poll books, known as SiteBooks, in order to develop guidelines for poll book systems across the United States. The pilot program aims to standardize the security checks for electronic poll books, improve national security posture, and increase trust in elections. Maricopa County’s SiteBooks, which connect to the internet and have unique features, have been hardened over the years to prevent unauthorized access. The testing and findings from the pilot program could inform further improvements to electronic poll book systems and provide guidance for jurisdictions nationwide. Read Article
Connecticut lawmakers approved over $25 million for the purchase of new voting machines, but it remains uncertain when the equipment will be available for use by local election officials. The decision on whether to spend the funds and purchase the new tabulators lies with Governor Ned Lamont. The state’s existing tabulators are over 16 years old and prone to jamming and breakdowns, prompting concerns among election administrators. The procurement process and implementation of the new machines would require time, training, and coordination with local officials, making it important to decide on the purchase soon to ensure they are in place for the upcoming presidential election. Read Article
An audit conducted by the auditing division of the Kansas Legislature found that election officials in more than a dozen counties in Kansas had adequate overall security practices and management of election computers but raised concerns about the security of ballots and vote tabulation machines. The audit compared Kansas’ election practices against recommended federal election security policies and revealed both strengths and weaknesses. The auditors recommended that the Secretary of State’s office create example election security policies, provide guidance to county election officers on sealing election materials, and use training opportunities to reinforce the importance of security measures. Secretary of State Scott Schwab acknowledged the need for strengthening certain election security policies and procedures. The audit was conducted in response to calls for election audits and reviews by individuals skeptical of the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. Read Article
Oakland County Circuit Judge Phyllis McMillen has ruled that it is illegal to possess a voting tabulator without authorization from the Secretary of State’s office or a court order. The ruling comes as part of an ongoing case in Michigan, where a group of supporters of former President Donald Trump is being investigated for allegedly obtaining voting machines and spreading false claims of widespread voter fraud after the 2020 election. Under state law, undue possession of a tabulator is a felony. The ruling by Judge McMillen lays the groundwork for potential criminal charges in the case. Read Article
Attorney Stefanie Lambert and others, accused of illegally obtaining voting machine tabulators after the 2020 presidential election, sought to move the case to Antrim County, Michigan, but were unsuccessful. The investigation by Michigan State Police involves allegations of a conspiracy to unlawfully access voting machines, and prosecutors are examining potential charges related to multiple crimes in multiple counties. The case involves allegations of orchestrated plans to gain access to voting tabulators and perform tests on the equipment. Lambert and others named in the investigation have denied any wrongdoing. The appointment of a special prosecutor is pending, and the issue of whether clerks have the authority to hand over election equipment without a court order is being debated in court. Read Article
A judge in Carson City has rejected the Nevada Republican Party’s motion to replace the state’s presidential primary election with a caucus. The lawsuit challenged a 2021 law that shifted Nevada from a caucus to a primary. The judge ruled that the Republican Party could still hold a caucus if it chose to do so. The party intends to proceed with a caucus in February to allocate presidential delegates and is seeking to avoid a state-run primary election. The 2021 law was signed by Democratic Governor Steve Sisolak and advanced Nevada’s position in the presidential nominating calendar. The Republican Party wants to maintain the traditional Iowa-New Hampshire-South Carolina-Nevada schedule. Read Article
A North Dakota county election official is suing the state’s election director to block the counting of mail-in ballots received after Election Day. The lawsuit was filed by the conservative group Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), known for bringing lawsuits during former President Donald Trump’s false claims of election fraud in 2020. The lawsuit argues that federal and state law conflict on the deadline for ballot submission, causing confusion and potential criminal penalties for election officials. PILF claims that allowing ballots to be counted after Election Day violates federal law and seeks to restore the significance of Election Day. Critics argue that the lawsuit is an attempt to challenge the delay in announcing election results and echoes Trump’s unfounded claims about the 2020 election. Read Article
Robert Sutherland and Doug Basler, both Republicans, are running against nonpartisan election administrators in an attempt to gain control of two major county election offices in Washington state. Their campaigns are elevating false claims about the election system, which could contribute to a hostile environment for election workers and undermine voters’ trust in the fairness of elections. Despite being long shots to win, their candidacies could increase the risk of harassment faced by election workers. Basler has questioned the integrity of the voting system and advocated for hand-counting paper ballots, while Sutherland has promoted conspiracy theories and expressed distrust in the election system. The ongoing candidacies of candidates like Basler and Sutherland contribute to the challenges faced by election administrators. Read Article
The future of Meagan Wolfe, the administrator of the Wisconsin Elections Commission, is in question as Republicans in the state Legislature call for her resignation, accusing her of being part of a plan to rig the 2020 election in favor of President Joe Biden. Despite multiple reports and reviews confirming the fairness and accuracy of the election, Republicans have targeted Wolfe, prompting Democratic election commissioners to seek a workaround to keep her in office beyond her term’s expiration. The outcome of this dispute could have implications for the 2024 presidential contest in Wisconsin, a key battleground state where margins are typically narrow. Read Article
The US Supreme Court rejected a legal theory that would have granted state legislatures broad powers to set rules for federal elections and engage in partisan gerrymandering. In a 6-3 vote, the court held that state legislatures are not exempt from the constraints imposed by state law. The case, Moore v. Harper, centered around a voting map drawn by the North Carolina Legislature that was initially rejected as a partisan gerrymander by the state’s Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court’s decision upheld the state court’s authority to review the actions of the state legislature and maintain its role in federal election matters. Read Article
Georgia’s top election official, Brad Raffensperger, is disregarding a recently released report by J Alex Halderman and Drew Springall, which identifies serious vulnerabilities in Georgia’s computerized election system. The report, sealed by the court for two years, found vulnerabilities in almost every part of the system that could potentially allow votes to be changed, potentially affecting election outcomes. Raffensperger, however, is siding with a conflicting report commissioned by Dominion Voting Systems and claiming that the vulnerabilities are unlikely to be exploited. Raffensperger’s decision not to address the system’s vulnerabilities before the 2024 presidential elections has been criticized as “irresponsible and wrong” by Halderman. The situation has led to a standoff between computer scientists and election deniers, with Raffensperger dismissing the scientists’ conclusions as “theoretical and imaginary”. The controversy raises concerns about the integrity of Georgia’s election system and the potential for election interference. Read Article
Republicans in control of the Wisconsin Senate have made a surprise move to force a vote on firing the state’s nonpartisan top elections official, Meagan Wolfe, before the 2024 presidential election. Democrats walked out of the Senate chamber in protest, objecting to the unscheduled vote taking place late in the evening. The Republican action is an attempt to circumvent the Wisconsin Elections Commission, which had tried to block the Senate from voting on Wolfe’s confirmation. Democrats fear that the Senate will reject her confirmation, effectively firing her. Wolfe, who has defended her decisions and fought against false claims of election fraud, has served as the state’s elections administrator since 2018 and is highly regarded in the field. Read Article
The Wisconsin state elections commission failed to reach an agreement on whether to reappoint Wisconsin Elections Commission administrator Meagan Wolfe, leaving the future of the state’s top election official uncertain. The commission, consisting of three Democrats and three Republicans, faced a deadlock on the issue, with Democrats abstaining from the vote in an attempt to ensure that Wolfe’s reappointment would be subject to a confirmation vote by the Republican-controlled state Senate. The partisan impasse leaves the leadership of Wisconsin’s election agency in turmoil less than a year before the next presidential election, as Republicans push for Wolfe’s ouster based on unfounded claims about the 2020 presidential election. The situation raises uncertainty about Wolfe’s position and the effective administration of future elections in the state. Read Article
The Supreme Court has rejected the most extreme version of the “independent state legislature theory,” which argues that state legislatures have absolute power in setting the rules of federal elections and cannot be second-guessed by state courts. The 6-3 ruling leaves open the possibility for more limited challenges that could increase the court’s role in deciding voting disputes during the 2024 presidential election. While voting rights groups celebrated the decision as a victory for democracy, critics noted that the court’s ruling still allows federal judges to review laws governing federal elections if state courts act outside the “ordinary bounds.” Conservatives and liberals agree that the question of the role of state courts in federal elections is likely to arise in last-minute challenges during the 2024 presidential election. Read Article
The Supreme Court’s rejection of the “independent state legislature theory” has effectively eliminated a controversial scheme used by Donald Trump in his attempt to overturn the 2020 election results. The scheme involved friendly state legislatures appointing alternate slates of pro-Trump electors, despite state laws certifying Joe Biden’s victory. Trump and his allies argued that state legislatures had the power to unilaterally reverse the outcome, even if it contradicted their own laws and constitutions. The theory, promoted by attorneys like John Eastman, had not been directly ruled on by any court, allowing proponents to present it as a plausible interpretation of constitutional law. However, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Moore v. Harper rejected the theory, signaling that state legislatures do not have unvarnished power and cannot replace the popular will. This decision has significant implications for future presidential contests, particularly in undermining similar attempts to subvert election results. Read Article
The Supreme Court ruling on the “independent state legislature theory” has brought stability to upcoming elections by confirming that state lawmakers’ power to control congressional elections can be checked by state courts and constitutions. The ruling rejects the extreme version of the theory and avoids potential chaos in the election system. However, it leaves a legal question about the boundaries of state courts’ authority, which may invite future requests for the Supreme Court to review state court rulings. The ruling does not directly affect North Carolina’s congressional map but raises questions about Ohio’s redistricting plan. Read Article
Republican lawmakers in several states have been seeking to increase their authority over state and local election offices, leading Democrats to warn of potential targeting of left-leaning counties in future elections. These efforts include granting legislative approval of court settlements in election-related lawsuits and creating avenues for taking control of local election offices. The moves have escalated since the 2020 presidential election, with Republicans characterizing them as necessary oversight while Democrats criticize them as power grabs that could interfere with voting. The concerns raised include fears of partisan manipulation and uncertainty surrounding election results. Read Article