Wisconsin’s top elections official for 2024 uncertain as incumbent’s term nears end | Harm Venhuizen/Associated Press

The oversight of Wisconsin’s 2024 presidential election remains uncertain as the term of the state’s top nonpartisan elections official, Meagan Wolfe, comes to an end. Republicans, who control the state Legislature, have clashed with Wolfe over conspiracy theories and may have an opportunity to remove her from office and appoint their own candidate. However, a recent state Supreme Court ruling suggests that Wolfe could potentially circumvent the Republicans and stay in office. The situation in Wisconsin is unfolding against the backdrop of a highly contested battleground state, with both parties vying for an advantage. The departure of election officials across the country due to the challenges and threats they faced during the 2020 election cycle has further complicated the situation. Read Article

National: Election officials suffer threats, harassment as 2024 looms | Chris Arnold/NPR

threats, harassment, and safety concerns as they prepare for the 2024 elections. Despite the lack of evidence of widespread voter fraud, election workers continue to receive threats from individuals who believe in former President Donald Trump’s false claims about rigged elections. The threats range from general harassment and abuse to more direct threats, including death threats and threats against their families. The Department of Homeland Security has warned that the next presidential race could mobilize individuals to commit violence. Many election officials are seeking additional resources to improve security and combat misinformation. Some workers are considering leaving their jobs due to the fear and harassment they face, while others are determined to continue their work in conducting free and fair elections. Read Article

Georgia Secretary of State’s refusal to fix voting machine bugs sets up 2024 election fight | John Sakellariadis/Politico

Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, is facing criticism from cybersecurity experts for his dismissive response to an audit that uncovered vulnerabilities in the state’s voting machine software. Raffensperger argues that the concerns are overblown and that no fixes are necessary. However, experts warn that ignoring the documented issues could jeopardize the integrity of the 2024 elections. The audit revealed several easy-to-hack security flaws in Dominion Voting Systems’ ImageCastX ballot-marking devices. While Raffensperger maintains that Georgia has effective controls in place, experts argue that addressing the vulnerabilities is crucial to prevent vote tampering or disinformation in future elections. The dispute highlights the ongoing debate over the security of electronic voting systems and the need for transparency and action to address potential vulnerabilities. Read Article

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court rejects GOP challenge to Pennsylvania mail voting law | Jeremy Roebuck and Jonathan Lai/Philadelphia Inquirer

The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court has rejected Republican arguments that recent court decisions on counting ballots with missing or incorrect dates rendered the state’s mail voting law, Act 77, invalid. The court ruled unanimously that the recent decisions did not invalidate any part of Act 77 but only interpreted how the dating provision should be applied by elections officials. The Republican lawmakers intend to appeal the decision to the state Supreme Court, which has previously upheld the mail ballot law in previous challenges. The ongoing legal battle revolves around whether undated mail ballots should be rejected or counted, with Republicans arguing for rejection and state elections administrators arguing for counting them to protect voting rights. Read Article

National: How AI is changing the 2024 election | Rebecca Klar and Julia Manchester/The Hill

The use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in political campaigns is expected to reach a significant turning point in the 2024 election cycle. Concerns arise regarding the spread of misinformation and how voters will react to artificially generated content in the politically polarized environment. The presidential campaigns for former President Trump and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis have already produced high-profile videos using AI, raising questions about the deceptive nature of such content. While proponents of AI acknowledge the risks, they believe it will play a consequential role in campaigning. However, the difficulty of discerning AI-generated content may lead to increased skepticism among voters. The burden of deciphering what is AI-generated will ultimately fall on voters, as regulations struggle to keep up with the rapidly evolving technology. Read Marticle

National: The cyber argument for regulating AI | Tim Starks/The Washington Post

Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer and Nathaniel Fick, the State Department’s ambassador at large for cyberspace and digital policy, have emphasized the need for swift regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) due to cyber-related risks. Schumer highlighted concerns about AI being used to manipulate and discredit elections by creating convincing fake images and footage of political candidates. Fick expressed worries about AI-empowered misinformation and cyberattacks, urging the development of regulatory structures to address these threats. The article also mentions other lawmakers who have proposed legislation to tackle AI-related issues, and it highlights the growing concern among cyber professionals about AI’s potential for malicious activities. Fick acknowledged that while AI’s capabilities for writing malicious code may currently be limited, its rapid development could lead to unforeseen dangers in the future. Both Schumer and Fick stressed the importance of acting quickly to protect democracy and cybersecurity from the risks posed by AI. Read Article

National: States with low election turnout did little in 2023 to expand voting access | Zachary Roth/States Newsroom

An analysis by States Newsroom reveals that eight U.S. states with turnout rates below 50%—Tennessee, West Virginia, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Hawaii, Arkansas, Indiana, and Alabama—did little to boost voter turnout this year. Instead, some of these states passed new restrictions that could make voting more difficult. The correlation between ease of voting and turnout suggests that making voting easier is a clear path to addressing low turnout rates, but most of these states are not pursuing that path. Several election officials in these states have stated that encouraging voting is not their job, and the findings highlight how inaction can be as powerful as active voter suppression. Read Article

National: Attorney John Eastman, who advised Trump’s efforts to undermine 2020 election, faces potential disbarment | Alanna Durkin Richer/Associated Press

Attorney John Eastman, known for his role in developing a legal strategy to overturn the 2020 election and keep Donald Trump in power, is facing disbarment in California. Prosecutors argued that Eastman concocted baseless theories and made false claims of fraud in an attempt to undermine the election results. Eastman’s attorney countered that his client never intended to steal the election but was exploring ways to delay the electoral vote count for investigations into alleged voting improprieties. The proceedings are expected to last at least eight days, and if found culpable, Eastman could face punishment such as suspension or revocation of his law license. The investigation into efforts to overturn the election results is separate from another probe into classified documents found at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate that led to felony charges against him. Read Article

Editorial: Black and Latino voters are being erased from databases: Here’s how to fix it | Miriam McKinney Gray/The Hill

Millions of Black and Latino individuals are missing or inaccurately listed in voter databases, according to a recent Stanford study. This disproportionately affects these communities, making 40% of them effectively invisible compared to 18% of white individuals. Locating these missing voters could impact the 2024 elections. Vendors supplement government lists with data, perpetuating exclusion and biases. Organizations are using workarounds like relational organizing and rejecting arbitrary vote propensity scores. However, responsibility should not solely lie with nonprofits. Political data vendors need transparency, campaigns should prioritize reaching missing voters, donors should reconsider metrics, and government authorities should end arbitrary purges. The erasure of Black and brown individuals from databases undermines democracy and requires urgent attention. Read Article

Voting Blogs: How AI Puts Elections at Risk — And the Needed Safeguards | Mekela Panditharatne and Noah Giansiracusa/Brennan Center for Justice

The Brennan Center highlights the emerging threat of artificial intelligence (AI) in elections and the potential for AI-driven disinformation to undermine democracy. It discusses the recent advancements in generative AI tools, such as deepfake audio and video, that can create convincing content resembling real people and events. These tools could be used to spread disinformation, manipulate public opinion, and undermine trust in the electoral process. The article calls for comprehensive measures to address this threat, including the designation of a lead agency to govern AI issues in elections, development of detection tools for deepfakes and disinformation campaigns, industry regulations, and transparency requirements for AI developers and social media platforms. It emphasizes the need for a coordinated global response to safeguard elections from the risks posed by AI. Read Article

Editorial: Hand Counting Ballots in Arizona? Did our Legislature learn nothing from the Cyber Ninjas? / Laurie Roberts/Arizona Republic

The recently passed bill in Arizona allowing counties to conduct full hand counts of ballots in future elections is criticized in this piece. It raises concerns about the inefficiency and potential inaccuracies associated with hand counts, citing the failed attempt by Cyber Ninja auditors to accurately tally the 2020 election results. The author argues that hand counts are prone to human error, time-consuming, and may lead to delayed results. Instead, the article emphasizes the importance of relying on reliable tabulation machines for efficient and accurate election processes. Read Article

Arkansas: Garland County election coordinator responds to paper ballot push | David Showers/The Sentinel-Record

The election chief of Garland County, Arkansas, Gene Haley, warned that if hand-counted ballots replace bar code voting machines, voters can expect long lines and the possibility of receiving the wrong ballot. Haley responded to claims by the Arkansas Voter Integrity Initiative that the bar code system used in the county since 2016 is susceptible to fraud. The Voter Integrity Initiative advocates for hand-counted ballots, but Haley argued that it would increase the chances of errors, require more resources and polling locations, and inconvenience voters. Haley emphasized that the machines are not connected to the internet, and the results are transmitted electronically only once on election night. Voting machines are regularly tested for accuracy in accordance with state law. Read Article

California: Shasta County faces proposed bill and regulations targeting hand-counted ballots | Mike Mangas and Adam Robinaon/KRCR

Shasta County has become a focal point for state legislators in Sacramento due to proposed regulations and a bill aimed at hand-counting ballots. The county recently acquired accessible voting machines for disabled voters, costing $800,000, and plans to transition to manual vote counting using a table with four people: one to call out the vote, one to visually confirm it, and two to keep count. However, the challenge lies in aggregating the results without using computer equipment. Assembly Bill 969, if passed, would limit hand-counting to elections with fewer than a thousand registered voters. While the bill’s status is still being determined, Shasta County must continue preparing for a hand count in the upcoming November election. The proposed regulations are currently open for public comment until July 5, with a public hearing scheduled in Sacramento on July 3. Read Article

Georgia officials lay out obstacles to updating election system before 2024 | Jeff Amy/Associated Press

Georgia election officials have stated that it will take six to nine months to update the state’s voting system with new software and hardware to address security flaws, rejecting calls to complete the updates before the 2024 election cycle. While Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has proposed waiting until 2025, critics argue that delaying the update until after the next presidential election would leave the voting equipment vulnerable to attacks. A group called the Coalition for Good Governance has been suing to eliminate the state’s electronic ballot marking system and proposed using hand-marked paper ballots when security breaches occur, but the State Elections Board rejected the proposal. The state plans to pilot the new system during some city elections in November, assuming compatibility issues are resolved. Read Article

Georgia State Election Board votes against taking over Fulton County elections | Mark Niesse/The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

The Georgia State Election Board unanimously voted against a potential state takeover of elections in Fulton County following the 2020 presidential race. The board acknowledged that Fulton County, known for its Democratic voters, had made significant improvements to its election operations over the past two years. A performance review initiated by Republican state legislators under a voting law passed in 2021 prompted these corrections. While the board decided against replacing Fulton’s bipartisan election board, they encouraged the county to continue its progress in preparation for the upcoming 2024 presidential election. The performance review did not find any violations of state laws, and Fulton County officials emphasized their commitment to making election operations more accountable statewide. The performance review had initially revealed disorganization and a lack of urgency in resolving issues in prior years but acknowledged the substantial changes made since 2020. The board also dismissed an allegation regarding illegal ballot scanning at State Farm Arena during the election. Read Article

Nevada officials call for dismissal of GOP lawsuit to stop presidential primary election | Eric Neugeboren/The Nevada Independent

State officials in Nevada are pushing back against a lawsuit filed by the Nevada Republican Party to halt the state’s scheduled presidential primary election in February. The lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of a new law requiring a presidential preference primary and argues that it violates the party’s freedom of association. The state’s attorney general’s office responded, stating that the lawsuit lacks legal merit and that the party is not obligated to accept the results of the primary in delegate allocation. Under the new law, Nevada will transition from caucuses to primary elections for both major political parties. The primary election results will be non-binding, allowing the party to decide how to allocate delegates. State officials argue that the primary election will enhance security and accessibility compared to caucuses. Read Article

Pennsylvania: Probe blames Luzerne County’s November ballot paper shortage on inexperience, poor training | Mark Scolforo/Associated Oress

A prosecutor’s review of voting problems in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, during the 2020 elections found no evidence of criminal activity or intentional efforts to hinder voting. The review, conducted by Luzerne District Attorney Sam Sanguedolce, attributed the problems to inexperienced supervisors and inadequate training. The county experienced a shortage of ballot paper, which led to voting delays and the use of emergency or provisional ballots. Sanguedolce’s report emphasized that the oversight was not intentional but rather a result of incompetence. Steps are being considered to prevent similar issues in the future, including deploying county workers from other departments and potentially hiring a consultant to improve procedures. The review also dismissed claims of tampering with voting machines or deliberate efforts to not order enough ballot paper. FRead Article

Texas Governor vetoes bill to give people with disabilities new mail voting option | Natalia Contreras/The Texas Tribune

Texas Governor Greg Abbott vetoed a bipartisan bill, House Bill 3159, that aimed to expand vote-by-mail access for people with disabilities, particularly those who are blind or paralyzed and require assistance marking their ballot. The bill, co-authored by state representatives Jeff Leach and John H. Bucy III, would have allowed voters with disabilities to request an electronic ballot and use a computer to mark their choices, ensuring private and secure voting. However, Abbott argued that the bill did not limit the use of electronic and accessible ballots exclusively to voters with disabilities, stating it would apply to any voter eligible for mail-in voting. Advocates, policy experts, and voting rights advocates disputed Abbott’s interpretation, pointing out that the bill specifically required voters to affirm a sickness or physical condition that prevents them from appearing at the polling place without assistance or injuring their health. The veto was seen as a setback for voters with disabilities who had long sought an independent way to mark their mail-in ballots. Read Article

Wisconsin: Attacks on election workers would be a felony under proposal being considered in legislature | Anya van Wagtendonk/Wisconsin Public Radio

A bipartisan proposal circulating through Wisconsin’s state Capitol aims to protect election workers by limiting public access to their identifying information and imposing harsher penalties for attacks on them. The bill would exempt many records containing personal details about poll workers from public access and make physically harming an election official or worker a felony offense. It would also extend whistleblower protection to election workers who report concerns about election fraud or irregularities. The proposal comes in response to the increase in harassment and threats faced by election workers during the 2020 election. Read Article

National: Election officials sound the alarm about violence against poll workers | Ayah Mahana/Politico

A group of former and current election officials in the United States is urging Congress to provide $400 million in federal funding to improve the working conditions and security measures for poll workers ahead of the 2024 election cycle. Threats against election workers have increased since the 2020 presidential election, with three out of four election officials reporting a spike in threats. The threats, often originating from individuals who deny the election results, have led to resignations and a shortage of experienced poll workers. Swing states like Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, and Pennsylvania have been particularly affected by threats of violence. The proposed funding would be used for training, doxxing prevention, privacy services, home security, and federal protections against threats. The aim is to ensure safe, free, and fair elections by addressing the rising concerns of violence against poll workers. Read Article

National: Trump Supporters’ Violent Rhetoric in His Defense Disturbs Experts | Michael S. Schmidt, Alan Feuer, Maggie Haberman and Adam Goldman/The New York Times

The federal indictment of former President Donald J. Trump has sparked a dangerous wave of calls for violence and an uprising from his supporters, creating a concerning atmosphere ahead of his court appearance in Miami. Trump’s close allies, including a member of Congress, have portrayed the indictment as an act of war, sought retribution, and…

Critics blast Georgia’s plan to delay software updates on its voting machines | Kate Brumback/Associated Press

Critics of Georgia’s plan to wait until after next year’s presidential election to install a software update to address security flaws on the state’s voting equipment called that irresponsible, saying the machines would be left open to attack. The vulnerabilities in the Dominion Voting Systems equipment were identified by an expert witness in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Georgia’s election system. The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, or CISA, last year published an advisory based on those findings that urges election officials to take steps to mitigate the risks “as soon as possible.” Read Article

National: Security Analysis of the Dominion ImageCast X | J. Alex Halderman/Freedom to Tinker

Today, the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Georgia permitted the public release of Security Analysis of Georgia’s ImageCast X Ballot Marking Devices, a 96-page report that describes numerous security problems affecting Dominion voting equipment used in Georgia and other states. I prepared the report two years ago, together with Prof. Drew Springall of Auburn University, as part of a long-running voting-rights lawsuit, Curling v. Raffensperger. Back in September 2020, the Court granted the Curling Plaintiffs access to one of Georgia’s touchscreen ballot marking devices (BMDs) so that they could assess its security. Drew and I extensively tested the machine, and we discovered vulnerabilities in nearly every part of the system that is exposed to potential attackers. The most critical problem we found is an arbitrary-code-execution vulnerability that can be exploited to spread malware from a county’s central election management system (EMS) to every BMD in the jurisdiction. This makes it possible to attack the BMDs at scale, over a wide area, without needing physical access to any of them. Read Article

National: At least 11 states have enacted restrictive voting laws this year, new report finds | Shania Shelton/CNN

A recent analysis by the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University’s law school reveals that 11 states have implemented 13 restrictive voting laws in 2023. This number surpasses the total of restrictive laws passed in any year over the past decade, with the exception of 2021, when 14 states enacted 22 such laws following the 2020 election. Additionally, 13 states have passed 19 expansive voting laws this year, making it easier for individuals to vote. The report highlights ongoing attempts by state legislatures to alter election laws in the wake of widespread election denialism, propagated by former President Donald Trump and his allies. The restrictive laws include measures like limiting access to mail voting and implementing stricter voter identification requirements. Read Article

National: ‘Fundamentally dangerous’: reversal of social media guardrails could prove disastrous for 2024 elections | Kari Paul/The Guardian

The convergence of increasing misinformation on social media, reduced content moderation by platforms, and the influence of AI poses a significant threat to democracy in the 2024 elections, according to experts. YouTube recently reversed its election integrity policy, allowing content questioning the validity of the 2020 elections to remain on the platform. Meta has reinstated the Instagram account of Robert F Kennedy Jr, known for spreading misinformation, and plans to allow Donald Trump to post again. Twitter has also seen a rise in misinformation since Elon Musk took over. These trends, coupled with the lack of transparency around moderation decisions, can further polarize voters and erode confidence in the electoral process. Experts call for stricter moderation rules, transparency, and a mutual agreement on the use of AI to address the crisis. Read Article

Editorial: The Great Missouri Hand-Count Swindle: How MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell Conned Patrick Jones and Kevin Crye, Costing Shasta County Millions | R.V. Scheide/A News Cafe

Osage County Clerk/Election Authority Nicci Bouse has criticized a manual tally voting system promoted by MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, arguing that it is more costly, time-consuming, and less accurate than the current ballot tabulation machines in use. Bouse’s conclusions were outlined in a letter to the editor published in a local newspaper, where she expressed concerns about the increased time, financial expenses, loss of volunteers, and decreased accuracy associated with hand counting. She also highlighted the smaller turnout of municipal elections compared to statewide and presidential elections, suggesting that developing a hand-count system as a backup to machines would be unnecessary. Read Article

Arizona: Preparing for the fight against 2024 election misinformation | Jerod MacDonald-Evoy/AZ Mirror

Election officials and experts are sounding the alarm about the growing threats and disinformation campaigns targeting election workers ahead of the 2024 Presidential election. The shift in climate since the 2020 election has put a strain on election administrators, leading to high turnover rates. Arizona, in particular, has been identified as a state with significant threats to election workers, including violent threats and harassment. Concerns arise over the appointment of election deniers to positions within election offices, which could lead to misinformation and maladministration. While officials emphasize the need for vigilance, they also highlight the importance of transparency in the election process to counter disinformation. Efforts are underway to ensure the safety of election workers and address threats, but the persistent spread of misinformation remains a challenge. Read Article

California: Shasta County scrapped its voting machines and didn’t replace them. A new bill would bar that | Jenavieve Hatch/The Sacramento Bee

Assemblywoman Gail Pellerin, D-Santa Cruz, has introduced Assembly Bill 969 in response to Shasta County Board of Supervisors’ decision to terminate its contract with Dominion Voting Systems. The bill aims to prevent counties from ending voting system contracts without a replacement plan in place. Pellerin argues that abruptly shifting to manual vote counting would be impractical and costly for counties, affecting the accuracy and efficiency of elections. She emphasizes the complexities involved in implementing a new voting system and highlights the need for resources and training. The bill passed in the Assembly, with some opposition from Republicans, and will now proceed to the Senate. Pellerin’s experience as a former County Clerk has shaped her belief in the importance of secure, transparent, and accessible voting processes. Read Article

Georgia won’t update vulnerable Dominion software until after 2024 election | Zachary Cohen and Sean Lyngaas/CNN

A recently unsealed report reveals that Georgia election officials have been aware of vulnerabilities in the state’s voting software for over two years but have chosen not to update the system until after the 2024 presidential election. The report highlights weaknesses in the Dominion  software, which have been previously confirmed by federal cybersecurity officials who recommended system updates. While Georgia officials argue that the vulnerabilities are unlikely to be exploited, critics warn that delaying security patches until 2025 could give adversaries ample time to prepare and deploy attacks. Dominion Voting Systems updated its software in response to the report’s attack scenarios, but Georgia has not implemented the recommended security patch. The report was released as part of a lawsuit by election integrity advocates against the Georgia secretary of state’s office. Read Article

Georgia: Judge unseals two election security reports that differ on risk | David Wickert/The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Two previously confidential reports on the security of Georgia’s election system have been unsealed by a federal judge. The reports, part of an ongoing lawsuit seeking to replace Georgia’s Dominion Voting Systems with hand-marked paper ballots, have generated debate about the state’s voting system. One report by a computer science professor identified vulnerabilities that could allow hackers to change votes, while the other report concluded that the risk of such acts was remote. The judge unsealed the reports after requests from critics and supporters of the system, and while the vulnerabilities were acknowledged, investigations and recounts have found no evidence of fraud in the 2020 election. The reports detail potential weaknesses in the voting system but also emphasize that the outlined attacks are operationally infeasible and would have a statistically insignificant impact on the outcome of an election. The lawsuit and debate over the voting system continue. Read Article