Virginia Governor codifies election security measures that were already in place | Elizabeth Beyer/Staunton News Leader

In a largely symbolic move, Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin issued an executive order on Wednesday to codify “election security measures” with the aim of protecting “legal voters and accurate counts” ahead of November’s hotly contested presidential election. Youngkin’s Executive Order 35 codifies the use of paper ballots in Virginia’s elections and ensures “non-citizens” are disqualified from voting. Those election security mechanisms are already in place in the commonwealth, however. Read Article

Wisconsin: Ballot drop boxes prove popular as they return to some cities for the primary | Alexander Shur/Votebeat

They opened to fanfare, and closed on or just before election day, having fulfilled their purpose. Absentee ballot drop boxes were back in Wisconsin for the first time in over two years, and everything seemed to go just fine. For Tuesday’s primary, voters in many Wisconsin municipalities had their first opportunity in several elections to return their ballots to a drop box. That could have been at one of the 14 drop boxes in Madison, one of the 13 locations in Milwaukee, the red drop box outside of Racine’s City Hall, or one of the other drop boxes located in places from Onalaska to Rhinelander. Many municipalities that used to have drop boxes didn’t reopen them for this election for various reasons, from a rusted drop box lock to a lack of time — the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s July 5 decision unbanning them came less than six weeks before the primary. Many of those cities plan to have drop boxes available in November, though. Read Article

Wyoming Secretary of State requests retest of voting machines in ‘multiple counties’ | Hannah Shields/Wyoming Tribune Eagle

Secretary of State Chuck Gray stated in a Monday news release that he sent out letters to several Wyoming county clerks, asking for them to retest their voting machines “following multiple reports” of these tests being out of compliance with state statute. “This problem was not isolated to Laramie County,” Gray said in the release. The Laramie County Republican Party filed a complaint last week with the Secretary of State’s Office, claiming the county’s voting machine test was not in compliance with state statute. According to the complaint, ballots fed into the machine on Aug. 5 had the same number of votes for each candidate. Under Wyoming statute, the machines must be fed ballots with a varied number of votes for candidates. Gray said in the release that this mistake was repeated in “multiple counties.” In a news release sent out eight days before the Aug. 20 primary election, Gray said the clerks of these counties have been asked to retest their voting machines. Read Article

National: Iran is accelerating US election influence operations, Microsoft research says | David DiMolfetta/Nextgov/FCW

Iran is stepping up its efforts to interfere in the 2024 U.S. elections, laying the groundwork to stoke chaos with fake news campaigns and seeking to get into the accounts of candidates, Microsoft said in a report Friday. One Iranian hacking group sent a spear-phishing email two months ago to a high-ranking presidential campaign official, relying on a compromised email account of a former senior adviser, according to the tech giant. It also tried to log into the account of a former presidential candidate. Microsoft didn’t name any of the targets. In total, four different groups have conducted a range of activities, Microsoft said. Read Article

Georgia website flaw allowed users to cancel others’ voter registrations | Colin Wood/StateScoop

A cybersecurity researcher over the weekend uncovered a flaw in a Georgia website that allowed anyone with rudimentary technical knowledge — and a bit of ill will — to cancel others’ voter registrations. ProPublica and Atlanta News First reported on Monday they’d been contacted over the weekend by cybersecurity researcher Jason Parker, who said he found the flaw and reported it to state officials. The flaw, which Georgia state officials said has been fixed, involved using a web browser to inspect the HTML of a new webpage for voter registration cancellation that’s administered by Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. In a video, Parker demonstrated how it was possible to cancel a voter’s registration using only a name, date of birth and county of residence. Read Article

How Texas election officials treat voter roll challenges led by True the Vote | Natalia Contreras/Votebeat

County election departments across Texas are trying to reassure voters amid a flood of formal challenges questioning whether their registrations are valid. The challenges, filed by conservative groups and individual activists, seek to remove tens of thousands of voters from the rolls on the grounds that they don’t live in the county, are not citizens, or have died. Election officials say the challenges are complicating the work they’re already doing to keep their voter rolls updated. They want voters to know that they’re following state and federal laws that protect voters from being improperly removed from the rolls if someone questions their eligibility. Read Arfticle

National: How secretary of state elections became the new battleground for election deniers | Sudiksha Kochi/USA Today

Kari Estes made a 25-minute journey from her home in Festus, Missouri, to the suburbs of St. Louis County on a hot summer evening to mingle with Democratic Secretary of State candidate Barbara Phifer. Estes was among a few dozen voters who gathered for an ice cream social to hear Phifer less than a week from the state’s primary election on Aug. 6. It was her first time seeing Phifer in person – and she said she felt an air of “hopefulness” in the room that day. “What she said when she addressed all of us is that the secretary of state position should be boring … (and) nonpartisan,” she said. “Since the ‘big lie’ and steal the election and all of that, people now are more aware of the importance of the secretary of state to be nonpartisan and neutral on the subject of certifying elections.” For Estes and many voters paying close attention to secretary of state races around the country, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Read Article

National: GOP continues a legal fight against mail ballots that arrive after Election Day | Ashley Lopez/NPR

Ahead of this year’s election, Republicans have been trying to stop some states — including swing state Nevada — from counting postmarked mail ballots that don’t make it to election officials until after Election Day. That legal effort hasn’t been going well. But Republican Party officials say they are committed to these challenges and in recent days they appealed their case in Mississippi to a conservative circuit court in the hopes of getting a favorable ruling there. Roughly 20 states plus Washington, D.C., accept and count mail-in ballots that are received after Election Day if they are postmarked on or before Election Day. These rules are meant to accommodate voters who don’t remember to turn in their ballot until Election Day and to create wiggle room in case there are issues with the Postal Service. Read Article

National: State lawmakers eye promise, pitfalls of AI ahead of November elections | Kevin Hardy/Stateline

Inside a white-walled conference room, a speaker surveyed hundreds of state lawmakers and policy influencers, asking whether artificial intelligence poses a threat to the elections in their states. The results were unambiguous: 80% of those who answered a live poll said yes. In a follow-up question, nearly 90% said their state laws weren’t adequate to deter those threats. It was among the many exchanges on artificial intelligence that dominated sessions at this week’s meeting of the National Conference of State Legislatures, the largest annual gathering of lawmakers, in Louisville. “It’s the topic du jour,” Kentucky state Sen. Whitney Westerfield, a Republican, told lawmakers as he kicked off one of many panels centering on AI. “There are a lot of discussions happening in all of our state legislatures across the country.” Read Article

National: Justice Deparment says it’s committed to sharing info about foreign election threats with tech companies | Eric Tucker/Associated Press

The Justice Department remains committed to sharing with social media companies information that it picks up about efforts by foreign governments to influence this year’s elections, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco told a lawyers’ conference on Friday. Speaking at the American Bar Association’s annual meeting, Monaco, the department’s No. 2 official, said that though it’s ultimately up to technology companies to decide what if any action to take, “We will provide companies with actionable intelligence so they can make decisions regarding abuse on their platforms by adversaries conducting foreign malign influence operations, including targeting our elections.” The comments were part of a wide-ranging speech on election security in which Monaco also warned that Russia remains the primary foreign threat to elections, with Moscow targeting specific voting demographics and using encrypted direct-messaging apps to reach Americans, and sound an alarm about a rising threat of violence to public officials — including election workers. Read Article

National: Vice presidential candidates present stark contrast on voting issues | Jessica Huseman/Votebeat

The selection Tuesday of Tim Walz, governor of Minnesota, as Kamala Harris’ vice presidential running mate spotlights a clear contrast with JD Vance, his counterpart on Donald Trump’s ticket, on the issue of voting. As governor, Walz has staked out a lengthy policy record on voting and election issues, including an expansion of voting rights. Vance has had fewer opportunities to affect voting policy as a senator, but his statements on the subject over the last four years, including false claims about voter fraud, offer insight into his views. Read Article

Arizona: Court blocks enforcement of voter intimidation rules, just before election | Jen Fifield/Votebeat

Arizona’s rules aimed at preventing specific types of voter intimidation and harassment near polling places and drop boxes are too broad and violate free speech rights, a Maricopa County judge ruled. The rules, some of which have been in place for years, prohibit anyone from following, photographing, videotaping, or yelling at voters outside drop boxes or polling places, along with other activities that Secretary of State Adrian Fontes had declared were intimidating. Tuesday’s injunction from Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Jennifer Ryan-Touhill temporarily prohibits Arizona officials from enforcing the rules, until the court can issue a final ruling in the matter. The ruling comes just two months before early voting begins for the presidential election, and as Republican groups pledge to watch over the polls. Fontes’s office said in a statement Tuesday that it will appeal the order. Read Article

Arkansas: Local, state officials defend election integrity, use of voting machines to count ballots | Tess Vrbin/Arkansas Advocate

Saline and Garland county officials told Arkansas lawmakers Wednesday that they have full confidence in the way they conduct elections, specifically the use of voting machines instead of hand-counted paper ballots, and decried the right-wing talking point that any elections have been “stolen.” The Joint City, County and Local Affairs Committee continued a discussion started by the Joint Performance Review Committee in June, in which Searcy County election officials said they had learned from the problems that arose from their first time hand-counting paper ballots in the March primary elections. Searcy, Saline and Garland counties were among the 15 the State Board of Election Commissioners randomly selected to audit from three pools of counties based on population, and Searcy County was the only one where auditors found problems with the way elections had been conducted, board director Chris Madison said. Read Article

Colorado judge denies acquittal to Tina Peters in charges related to voting machine data leak | Amanda Pampuro/Courthouse News Service

A Colorado judge on Thursday denied a motion for judgment of acquittal filed by Tina Peters, the former Mesa County clerk and recorder facing criminal charges related to a 2021 voting machine data leak. “Considering all of the forgoing evidence and in light of the charges that have been filed, the court does conclude the people have established sufficient evidence in both quantity and quality that proves her guilt beyond the reason of doubt,” 21st Judicial District Judge Matthew Barrett, an appointee of Democratic Governor Jared Polis, said from the bench. Following seven days of witness testimony from state and Mesa County elections administrators, as well as an employee of Dominion Voting Systems, and a man who’s identity was misused in the leak, prosecutors rested their case Thursday. Read Article

Georgia Board Grants Local Officials New Power Over Certifying Elections | Nick Corasaniti/The New York Times

The Republican-controlled Georgia State Election Board approved on Tuesday a measure that could empower local officials to refuse or delay certification of a county’s election results, creating the potential for another disputed and contentious post-election period in November. The new rule states that before certifying results, local officials may conduct “reasonable inquiry” that “the results are a true and accurate accounting of all votes cast in that election.” Though seemingly innocuous, the language implies that local election officials are awarded a level of discretion in the certification process, a suggestion that runs counter to decades of settled Georgia law delineating how results are officially certified. State law dictates that officials “shall” certify an election, making the process effectively ministerial; disputes over alleged fraud or major errors are typically left to recounts and courts. Read Article

Illinois Voter Data Exposed by Contractor’s Unsecured Databases | Lily Hay Newman/WIRED

Databases containing sensitive voter information from multiple counties in Illinois were openly accessible on the internet, revealing 4.6 million records that included driver’s license numbers as well as full and partial Social Security Numbers and documents like death certificates. Longtime security researcher Jeremiah Fowler stumbled upon one of the databases that appeared to contain information from DeKalb County, Illinois, and subsequently discovered another 12 exposed databases. None were password protected nor required any type of authentication to access. As criminal and state-backed hacking becomes ever more sophisticated and aggressive, threats to critical infrastructure loom. But often, the biggest vulnerabilities come not from esoteric software issues, but from gaping errors that leave the safe door open and the crown jewels exposed. After years of efforts to shore up election security across the United States, state and local awareness about cybersecurity issues has improved significantly. But as this year’s US election quickly approaches, the findings reflect the reality that there are always more oversights to catch. Read Article

Michigan: Power outages and humid ink barely mar a smooth day of voting in low turnout primary | Hayley Harding/Votebeat

Even after nine days of early voting and 40 days to return absentee ballots, Michigan’s August primary appeared to be a relatively low turnout election. Officials said the majority of voters had already cast their ballots before election day on Tuesday. As of Monday, more than 1 million people across the state had voted, the vast majority of them doing so absentee. Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said Tuesday night that she expected totals to be near 2 million, which would be less than a quarter of the state’s total registered voters. In 2022, there were more than 2.1 million votes cast in Michigan’s August primary. Four years ago, there were more than 2.5 million votes cast. Read Article

Nevada county won’t hand-count in 2024, but some officials support doing so in the future | Gabe Stern/Associated Press

County commissioners in rural northeastern Nevada decided Wednesday not to submit a plan to hand-count votes in November, but some officials said they support implementing it in future election cycles in the latest debate over voting machines across the Western swing state. Elko County commissioners said it was far too close to the election to implement such a plan — parts of which they acknowledged did not meet state guidelines for hand-counting. Instead organizers and some officials said they supported lobbying state officials to allow more methods of hand-counting than what are currently outlined in those guidelines, which they say are too arduous, in the future. Resad Article

A North Carolina county is losing its 2 top election officials weeks before balloting begins | Associated Press

A North Carolina county will soon lose its top two election administrators mere weeks before the first general election ballots go out to voters. The elections board in Pasquotank County, along the Virginia border about 170 miles (274 kilometers) northeast of Raleigh, this week accepted the resignation of Deputy Director Troy White, The Daily Advance of Elizabeth City reported. White’s departure is effective Aug. 16, the same day that the resignation of Director Emma Tate takes effect. Staffing has long been a challenge for election offices nationally, but 2020 was a tipping point with the pandemic-related challenges before the presidential vote and the hostility afterward driven by false claims of a rigged election. Other politically important states have also seen considerable turnover. For instance, 11 of Nevada’s 17 counties have had turnover in top county election positions since the 2020 election. Read Article

Pennsylvania’s Department of State guidance was a 2020 lightning rod. This is how it works. | Carter Walker/Spotlight PA

When legislative Republicans urged Congress to reject Pennsylvania’s electoral votes for Joe Biden in 2020, they didn’t cite voter fraud or illegal activity. Instead, they pointed to something seemingly innocuous: guidance from the Pennsylvania Department of State. State Republicans including then-state House Speaker Bryan Cutler accused the agency of undermining Pennsylvania’s new mail voting law. Jake Corman, then the state Senate’s majority leader, called on former Secretary Kathy Boockvar to step down, saying, “To have this sort of stuff going on at the 11th hour is unconscionable.” Corman was referencing guidance issued by Boockvar the day before the November 2020 election that advised counties to notify voters of fatal defects with their mail ballots and have them vote provisionally at a polling place. Some counties followed the guidance, and some didn’t. Read Article

Texas activist frustrates election officials with lawsuit about threat to ballot secrecy | Natalia Contreras/The Texas Tribune

Laura Pressley claims to hold the key to what should be a closely guarded secret: how every voter in Williamson County has voted. Her story about how she got hold of this information goes something like this: She had gathered clues through scores of public-records requests she had made over the years to the Williamson County elections department, looking for a breakthrough in her quest to find flaws with the electronic voting machines that Texans use to cast their ballots. One day, she fell to her knees, weeping, and asked God to reveal to her the vulnerabilities she was certain existed, she told attendees at an April social media event on ballot secrecy issues organized by the right-wing organization Cause of America, according to an audio recording reviewed by Votebeat. “I said, ‘Dear Lord, show me the pattern, because I know it’s here.’” Around 20 minutes later, by her account, “the Lord showed me the pattern, and I found it. I was literally in shock — emotional shock — to actually have the knowledge of how every voter in Williamson County votes.” Read Article

Under Wisconsin’s ‘drawdown’ election law, one person’s error can cost another person their vote | Alexander Shur/Votebeat

Consider this scenario: An absentee ballot in Wisconsin gets returned with an error, like the voter failing to sign the envelope, but it mistakenly gets counted anyway, because a municipal election worker initially didn’t catch the error when taking the ballot out of the envelope. Later, perhaps during a recount, a worker catches the error and has to mark that voter as invalid. And now the number of ballots in the counting pile is one greater than the number of valid voters. The solution? Just pull one random ballot out of the pile and set it aside to not be counted. Now the numbers match up. But someone — it’s impossible to know who — got their valid vote tossed. It may not seem fair, but it actually happens from time to time in Wisconsin — and almost nowhere else — because of an election law that’s nearly as old as the state. Election officials aren’t crazy about the practice, called a ballot drawdown, and say it is reserved only for extraordinary cases. Read Article

National: Like Election Systems, Voter Registration Must Be Cyber Secure | Jule Pattison-Gordon/Government Technology

Cyber and elections experts turned their attention during a recent webinar to the possibility of hackers trying to compromise digital jurisdictions’ voter registration systems — and what defenders can do about it. “If [advanced persistent threat actors] are trying to come after us, or our election, and they know that it’s near impossible to get into our voting systems and get out of it without detection, then the next easiest target is to mess with our registration system[s],” Craig Bowman, vice president of government, education and healthcare at cybersecurity company Trellix, said in the FedInsider webinar. Adversary nations want to tamper with U.S. elections to promote candidates whose policy stances they prefer or to foment chaos that undermines the credibility of American democracy, Bowman said. Read Article

National: ‘Wild west of election work’: How certification fights are already cropping up in battleground states | Sara Murray/CNN

Georgia conservative Julie Adams spread conspiracies about election workers, concocted a baseless story about ballot couriers drinking beer and doing drugs while hoarding ballots, and boasted of her contentious relationship with local election officials. Then, in February, Adams was sworn in as a member of the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections in Georgia. In one of her first acts, she sued the rest of the board and the elections director, claiming she should not be forced to certify election results “without access to all elements of the election materials”. The dustup in Fulton County is just one example of the election certification fights already cropping up in battleground states, from Georgia to Michigan to Nevada this year. The election officials who have refused to certify have said they’re guarding against election fraud or seeking information they believe is necessary to certify the results. But voting rights activists see the challenges as an effort to undermine faith in the election process and test out ways to contest the election results in November. Read Article

National: The Voting Machine Conspiracy Theorists Are Still at It | Alan Feuer/The New York Times

Nearly four years later, zealous supporters of former President Donald J. Trump who promoted the conspiracy theory that Dominion Voting Systems had rigged its machines to rob him of the 2020 election are still at it. Even though Dominion has aggressively defended itself in court, a network of pro-Trump activists has continued to push false claims against the company, often by seeking to use information gleaned from the very defamation lawsuits the firm has filed against them. The network includes wealthy business executives like Patrick Byrne, who once ran Overstock.com, and Mike Lindell, the founder of the bedding company MyPillow. Both have sought without credible evidence to put Dominion at the heart of a vast conspiracy to deny Mr. Trump a victory. It also includes a pro-Trump sheriff from southwest Michigan, a former election official from Colorado and Mr. Byrne’s own lawyer, who is facing charges of tampering with Dominion machines and who once worked alongside Mr. Trump’s legal team in claiming that the company was part of a plot to subvert the last election. Read Article

National: Election officials continue to face threats, harassment ahead of November | Laura Romero/ABC

In early July, a man wearing a gator face mask, sunglasses, and camera equipment attached to a vest walked into the elections building in King County, Washington, and began to take videos and photos of the employees and their surroundings. The man, according to a video obtained by ABC News, approached a counter and began harassing the election workers as he recorded them with his equipment. After he left, the man posted a video of the interaction on YouTube and published some of the staff’s names, emails, and phone numbers, which officials said resulted in “dozens of calls and emails” to election workers. Read Article

National: A Senate Bill Would Radically Improve Voting Machine Security | Eric Geller/Wired

Congress is moving closer to putting US election technology under a stricter cybersecurity microscope. Embedded inside this year’s Intelligence Authorization Act, which funds intelligence agencies like the CIA, is the Strengthening Election Cybersecurity to Uphold Respect for Elections through Independent Testing (SECURE IT) Act, which would require penetration testing of federally certified voting machines and ballot scanners, and create a pilot program exploring the feasibility of letting independent researchers probe all manner of election systems for flaws. The SECURE IT Act—originally introduced by US senators Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, and Susan Collins, a Maine Republican—could significantly improve the security of key election technology in an era when foreign adversaries remain intent on undermining US democracy. Read Article

National: Election offices are slowly adopting .gov domains, report finds | Sophia Fox-Sowell/StateScoop

A growing number of election offices are adopting verified, top-level .gov domains to safeguard against impersonation, phishing attacks and the spread of misinformation, according to a report published by the Washington think tank Bipartisan Policy Center. The report includes analysis of a dataset maintained by the Center for Tech and Civic Life consisting of websites and contact information for all local election offices in the United States. The center found that since 2022, nearly a third of the nation’s 7,000-plus election office websites have adopted .gov domains. William Adler, associate director of the center’s Elections Project and one of the report’s authors, said he’s encouraged by the trend, but that it’s still moving slowly. Read Article

National: Russia is relying on Americans to spread election disinformation, officials say | David Klepper/Associated Press

The Kremlin is turning to unwitting Americans and commercial public relations firms in Russia to spread disinformation about the U.S. presidential race, top intelligence officials said Monday, detailing the latest efforts by America’s adversaries to shape public opinion ahead of the 2024 election. The warning comes after a tumultuous few in U.S. politics that have forced Russia, Iran and China to revise some of the details of their propaganda playbook. What hasn’t changed, intelligence officials said, is the determination of these nations to seed the internet with false and incendiary claims about American democracy to undermine faith in the election. “The American public should know that content that they read online — especially on social media — could be foreign propaganda, even if it appears to be coming from fellow Americans or originating in the United States,” said an official from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity under rules set by the office of the director. Read Article

National: State election directors fear the Postal Service can’t handle expected crush of mail-in ballots | Steve Karnowski/Associated Press

State election directors from across the country voiced serious concerns to a top U.S. Postal Service official Tuesday that the system won’t be able to handle an expected crush of mail-in ballots in the November election. Steven Carter, manager of election and government programs for the postal service, attempted to reassure the directors at a meeting in Minneapolis that the system’s Office of Inspector General will publish an election mail report containing “encouraging” performance numbers for this year so far. “The data that that we’re seeing showing improvements in the right direction,” Carter told a conference of the National Association of State Election Directors. “And I think the OIG report is especially complimentary of how we’re handling the election now.” Read Article