Warren Stewart – Page 30 – The Voting News

Texas state senators Thursday held a public hearing on legislation crafted to update a 2023 law requiring certain counties to drastically increase the number of polling locations if they use vote centers for countywide voting. Last year, Votebeat reported that election officials in several counties said they were struggling to comply with the law as written. “Most election administrators and county clerks will tell you they’re struggling to find workers on Election Day,” Bettencourt said during the hearing Thursday. He cited an example reported by Votebeat last year of election officials in Brazos County who said they were struggling to comply with the law. Read Article

Washington Supreme Court rejects challenge to mail-in ballot signature verification process | Monique Merrill/Courthouse News Service

Washington state’s mail-in ballot process that requires election workers to verify ballot signatures will remain in place, the state’s Supreme Court ruled on Thursday. “The undisputed fact that signature verification results in tens of thousands of votes being disqualified every election raises significant constitutional concerns,” Washington Supreme Court Justice Steven Gonzalez wrote in the 32-page opinion. However, the high court determined that the law at issue does not itself require election workers to disqualify a single valid ballot, and the opportunities to cure rejected ballots don’t exclude or unduly burden voters. Read Article

Wisconsin voters give notice they’re suing over misplaced ballots in the November election | Scott Bauer/Associated Press

Four Wisconsin voters whose ballots were not counted in the November presidential election initiated a class-action lawsuit Thursday seeking $175,000 in damages each. The voters were among 193 in Madison whose ballots were misplaced by the city clerk and not discovered until weeks after the election. Not counting the ballots didn’t affect the result of any races. The Wisconsin Elections Commission investigated but did not determine whether Madison Clerk Maribeth Witzel-Behl failed to comply with state law or abused her discretion. She didn’t notify the elections commission of the problem until December, almost a month and a half after the election and after the results were certified on Nov. 29. Read Article

Wyoming: Bills banning ballot drop boxes, touch screen voting machines fail in Senate | Hannah Shields/Wyoming Tribune Eagle

A majority of Secretary of State Chuck Gray’s election integrity bills died Friday night after failing to pass first reading in the Wyoming Senate, including two that threatened to “upend” Laramie County elections, according to County Clerk Debra Lee. A large number of election-related bills were filed this session, making up 8% of total proposed legislation, according to WyoFile.com. House Bill 245, “Pen and paper ballots,” would have removed touch-screen voting machines that have been used by Laramie County voters for decades. Lee previously told lawmakers this bill would “upend” elections in her county. Read Article

National: Trump keeps cutting election security jobs. Here’s what’s at risk | Jocelyn Mintz/Fast Company

As the Trump administration continues to dismantle federal agencies, one that plays a critical role in U.S. infrastructure and election security faces an uncertain future. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), housed in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and tasked with enforcing cybersecurity and protecting American infrastructure across all levels of government, placed multiple members of its election security team on administrative leave over the last few weeks. The 17 reported election security team members, part of the agency’s foreign influence and disinformation teams, were placed on administrative leave as part of an overall review of the team, with a particular focus on those two operations. A DHS spokesperson neither confirmed nor denied that number. On Friday, the Trump administration separately fired more than 130 members of CISA, the DHS confirmed. Read Article

National: Mac Warner, Who Said CIA Stole Election, Now Leads DOJ Civil Rights | Ben Penn/Bloomberg Law

The Justice Department has inserted Mac Warner, who last year espoused false claims that the CIA stole Trump’s 2020 presidential victory with the FBI’s help, to run the civil rights division, replacing an ousted career official who’s started reporting to the new sanctuary cities office. Warner, West Virginia’s former secretary of state, embraced conspiracy theories about the 2020 election while running in the state’s GOP gubernatorial primary. Warner told DOJ civil rights staff Monday that he’s assumed control of the division, according to an email obtained by Bloomberg Law. He’ll function as the top official until Harmeet Dhillon, another 2020 election denier who Trump selected to lead the anti-discrimination enforcement office, wins Senate confirmation. Read Article

National: Fact-check: Trump relies on falsehoods when pushing voting changes in speech to governors | Amy Sherman/PolitiFact

President Donald Trump told governors to change their election laws and repeated falsehoods and misleading statements to make his case for new voting policies. If states required “proof of citizenship, voter ID, paper ballots, one day voting,” Trump said, it would result in knowing “the results of your election by 10 p.m.” What Trump leaves out: The vast majority of U.S. voters already use paper ballots; a majority of states require voter ID at the polls; and only U.S. citizens can vote in federal elections. Read Article

National: State Election Officials Seek to Avert Deeper Cuts | Nick Corasaniti/The New York Times

Alarmed by cuts already made to federal agencies that help safeguard elections, and fearful that more could be coming, a bipartisan group of the nation’s top state election officials has appealed to Kristi Noem, the secretary of homeland security, for help. In a rare move, the ordinarily restrained National Association of Secretaries of State wrote to Ms. Noem, the former South Dakota governor, on Friday asking that critical election programs and protections be spared during an upcoming agency review. Among the programs the group singled out for preservation were those aimed at assessing the physical security of voting locations and election offices, shoring up cybersecurity for election offices, sharing classified intelligence on foreign threats to elections and responding to attacks like ransomware. Read Article

National: Election systems feared to be vulnerable as Trump administration cuts workers tasked with security | Nicole Sganga/CBS

Over the last month, the U.S. government has worked quickly to pause, disband and dismantle the U.S. effort to fight foreign meddling in elections, raising concern among federal lawmakers and election officials across the country who rely on the federal cybersecurity agency and its counterparts to warn them about attacks on election systems. First came a flurry of notices forcing out Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency personnel who are tasked with stopping foreign interference in U.S. elections — at least a dozen have been put on leave or fired over the past month. Then, on Attorney General Pam Bondi’s first day in office on Feb. 5, she disbanded the FBI task force targeting foreign influence operations originating from places like Russia, China and Iran. Read Article

National: CISA layoffs do foreign disinformation peddlers a massive favor | Gintaras Radauskas/Cybernews

At the beginning of February, staff at the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), who are focused on disinformation and influence operations, were placed on leave, sparking concerns about the future of American efforts to counter digital threats under the new administration. For good measure, Pam Bondi, the new Attorney General, also dissolved an FBI task force formed in response to Russian interference in the 2016 presidential elections that worked to sniff out efforts by Russia, China, or Iran to manipulate US voters. These moves aren’t surprising as they originate from within an administration that has consistently claimed that even merely pointing out potential disinformation is censorship in disguise. Read Article

National: Experts warn the proposed SAVE Act could make it harder for some married women to vote. Here’s who could be affected. | Alex Clark/CBS

A claim circulating on social media suggests that married people who changed their last name will face difficulties when trying to vote under the proposed Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act. Experts say the bill, which was recently reintroduced in the U.S. House of Representatives, would not explicitly prevent these voters from casting a ballot, but it could create barriers to registration by requiring them to show additional documentation. If passed, the act would amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which requires states to offer voter registration when obtaining a driver’s license, to mandate documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration. Read Article

Arizona voter proof-of-citizenship laws blocked by federal appeals court | Jen Fifield/Votebeat

Two Arizona laws that restrict voting by people who don’t prove their U.S. citizenship are “unlawful measures of voter suppression,” the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled. The appeals court on Tuesday upheld a 2023 decision from the U.S. District Court of Arizona that found many provisions of two 2022 Republican-backed laws unconstitutional. That includes one provision that prohibits voters who don’t prove citizenship from voting for president, and another that prohibits them from voting by mail. The judges also found that the state must allow voters who don’t prove citizenship to vote in federal elections even if they use a state voter registration form. Read Article

Georgia election board drops suit after group fails to produce ballot-stuffing evidence | Kate Brumback/Associated Press

The Georgia State Election Board on Wednesday voted to dismiss a lawsuit seeking to enforce a subpoena against a conservative group that was unable to produce evidence to support its claims of ballot stuffing in the state. Texas-based True the Vote in 2021 filed complaints with Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, including one in which it said it had obtained “a detailed account of coordinated efforts to collect and deposit ballots in drop boxes across metro Atlanta” during the November 2020 election and a crucial runoff election for two U.S. Senate seats in January 2021. Investigators with the secretary’s office looked into the group’s complaints and in April 2022 subpoenaed True the Vote for evidence supporting its allegations. A lawyer for the group wrote to a state attorney in May 2023 that a complete response would require it to identify people to whom it had pledged confidentiality and said it was withdrawing its complaints. Read Article

Massachusetts: Citing lapses, state to oversee Boston’s elections department | Matt Stout/Boston Globe

Secretary of State William F. Galvin said he’s appointing a receiver inside the city of Boston’s Elections Commission to help oversee the department through 2026, including for this year’s mayoral vote, after the department stumbled through several “unacceptable” problems last fall. Galvin released an order Monday mandating several changes in the department after his office investigated and confirmed complaints that polling locations in the city didn’t receive enough ballots during November’s election. State officials had been in talks with city officials, but Galvin said in a Globe interview that he determined last week they wouldn’t be able to reach a voluntary settlement that “was sufficient.” Read Article

Missouri’s top election official dinged over his push for hand-counting ballots | Kurt Erickson/St. Louis Post-Dispatch

During his successful campaign for secretary of state, Republican Denny Hoskins trumpeted a debunked claim that counting ballots by hand is the best way to determine the outcome of elections. But, in his proposed $68 million budget for the fiscal year beginning in June, the state’s top election official made no move to hire additional employees to undertake a process that is currently handled electronically. The absence raised the eyebrows of the top budget writer in the state Senate Wednesday, who said he was expecting Hoskins to make good on his campaign promises. Read Article

New Jersey ballots will look different this year. Here’s what’s being considered. | Aliya Schneider/The Philadelphia Inquirer

After a federal judge ruled that New Jersey’s ballot design was likely unconstitutional, state lawmakers found themselves recreating the rules of the ballot in what one expert called the most drastic ballot redesign happening in this political moment. State lawmakers have been navigating a hefty question: What makes a fair ballot? And, those watching have asked, how far from tradition are elected officials willing to stray when their own political future is in play? The stakes are high. With the old system gone, candidates with establishment support lose the advantage the old county line system gave them, incentivizing more candidates to throw their hat into the ring. Read Article

North Carolina: America’s last undecided election threatens our core democratic principles | Edward B. Foley/Salon

One of the most important premises of America’s election system in the 21st century is that the federal judiciary demands that the states must treat all cast ballots equally. Federal courts require states to uphold the constitutional principle of equal protection if the government of a state has determined that certain offices are to be decided by popular vote. Furthermore, states must adhere to the right to due process. After an election has been completed, federal law prohibits states from throwing out ballots that were cast in accordance with the prevailing understanding of established election practices in that state at the time of the election. These two bedrock principles of free and fair elections currently risk being weakened by a highly unusual election dispute playing out in North Carolina — and I am astounded that there’s any chance the courts would throw out the votes of North Carolinians who properly cast their ballots in last November’s election. Read Article

Pennsylvania: Less secure elections, higher costs for counties: How Donald Trump’s cuts to security agencies would affect Pennsylvanians | Jordan Wilkie/WITF

Pennsylvania’s top elections agency hopes the Trump administration will see how valuable CISA’s elections work is to local jurisdictions and will continue to fund it, Jonathan Marks, deputy secretary for elections and commissions under Schmidt, told the senators on Thursday. “CISA were very valuable to our state and to other states,” Secretary of State Al Schmidt told Pennsylvania senators during an appropriations hearing Thursday. “They have a national and global perspective when it comes to cyber security risks and all the rest that each individual state can’t do on its own.” Now, Schmidt is waiting to learn whether the federal agency will be shuttered. The work of CISA’s Elections Security and Resilience Division has been paused by the Trump administration at least until early March pending a review of the agency’s work. Read Article

Pennsylvania needs a new voter registration system before 2028, secretary of state says | Chris Comisac/Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Pennsylvania has wanted to upgrade its aging voter registration system for several years, but there have been stumbles. Legislators were told earlier this week that an updated system is needed before the next presidential election in 2028. The process to update Pennsylvania’s Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors, known as SURE, was started in 2019 after it was determined the system, created in 2003, was substantially outdated. The system is used by election officials to add, remove or update the status of every voter in the commonwealth. The data in the system is constantly updated at the county level to ensure the voter rolls are accurate. Read Article

Utah Republicans move to overhaul election operations, starting with universal mail-in voting | Hannah Schoenbaum/Associated Press

Utah’s universal mail-in voting system could be the first casualty of a Republican overhaul of the state’s election operations as lawmakers look to improve efficiency and trust in the system. The state’s Republican-controlled House passed a bill in a 57-15 vote Tuesday that would require Utah voters to opt in to receive their ballots in the mail, meaning they would no longer get them automatically. Starting next year, voters who want to return their ballots by mail or to a drop box would need to include the last four digits of their drivers license or state ID number. The proposal would dramatically change the voting system in one of just eight states — and the only led by Republicans — that allows all elections to be conducted by mail without a need to opt in. Read Article

Wisconsin’s inconsistent ballot instructions put voters at risk | Alexander Shur/Votebeat

In some states, a lack of required uniform instructions on how to cast and return absentee ballots is leading to voter confusion and sometimes disenfranchisement, disability and voting advocates say. States that provide less specific instructions or conflicting information put their voters at risk, said Barbara Smith Warner, executive director of the National Vote at Home Institute. “If the idea is that everybody has the same right to vote, then everyone should have the same information about how to do it,” she said. “Anything less than that just feels like a setup for voter disenfranchisement.” Wisconsin’s rules create just that sort of risk. State law requires the Wisconsin Elections Commission to develop uniform instructions for absentee ballots, but it doesn’t specify what those instructions should cover. Moreover, the law doesn’t explicitly require municipalities to actually use the WEC instructions. Read Article

Election officials blast Trump’s ‘retreat’ from protecting voting against foreign threats | Matt Vasilogambros/Stateline

The Trump administration has begun dismantling the nation’s defenses against foreign interference in voting, a sweeping retreat that has alarmed state and local election officials. Local election officials are nervous and uncertain about the federal election security cuts, said Pamela Smith, president and CEO of Verified Voting, a nonprofit that works with state and local election officials to keep voting systems secure. The threat landscape for elections is “extreme,” she said. And even though it’s not a major election year, quieter times are when election offices can prepare and perfect their practices, she said. “It is a retreat and it’s a really ill-advised one,” she said. “It’s a little bit like saying the bank has a slow day on Tuesday, we’re going to let our security guards go home.” Read Article

US propagandist paid by Kremlin targets German election with network of fake news sites | AFP

From a fabricated sex scandal to a fake museum heist, disinformation aimed at influencing Germany’s high-stakes election is originating from dozens of AI-generated German sites apparently linked to a US fugitive turned Kremlin propagandist, researchers say. John Dougan runs a network of more than 100 such fake sites, which mimic German media outlets, mirroring a disinformation tactic used during the American election last year, according to researchers at the German nonprofit Correctiv and the US watchdog NewsGuard. The sites by the former Florida deputy sheriff, who fled to Russia while facing a slew of charges including extortion, are flooding the internet with content favourable to the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party. Read Article

National: Dismantling of federal efforts to monitor election interference creates opening for foreign meddling | Ali Swenson and Christina A. Cassidy/Associated Press

When a suspicious video of ballots being ripped up in Pennsylvania gained attention on social media last October, federal agencies responded quickly and called it out as Russian disinformation. On Election Day in November, bomb threats to polling places in numerous states caused relatively few disruptions to voting. It’s one of the many scenarios covered by the nation’s cybersecurity agency in its outreach to state and local officials. The future of that assistance is now uncertain. The Trump administration’s downsizing and disbanding of federal agencies has hit efforts that improve election security and monitor foreign influence. That could create gaps for America’s enemies to exploit the next time the country holds a major election. Read Article

National: Trump Justice Department signals retreat from voting rights cases | Carrie Levine/Votebeat

The government’s approach to voting rights is changing fast under the new administration, and a complex, closely watched redistricting case out of Louisiana shows just how fast. On Jan. 16, the U.S. solicitor general, who represents the government in court, asked the Supreme Court to allow the federal government to participate in upcoming oral arguments in the Louisiana case. But on Jan. 24, four days after Donald Trump was inaugurated as president, the acting solicitor general withdrew that request. Her filing said the government no longer supported its earlier argument that the district court had erred in its ruling. Read Article

National: Trump keeps cutting election security jobs. Here’s what’s at risk | Jocelyn Mintz/Fast Company

As the Trump administration continues to dismantle federal agencies, one that plays a critical role in U.S. infrastructure and election security faces an uncertain future. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), housed in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and tasked with enforcing cybersecurity and protecting American infrastructure across all levels of government, placed multiple members of its election security team on administrative leave over the last few weeks, according to reports by the Associated Press and TechCrunch. The 17 reported election security team members, part of the agency’s foreign influence and disinformation teams, were placed on administrative leave as part of an overall review of the team, with a particular focus on those two operations. A DHS spokesperson neither confirmed nor denied that number. On Friday, the Trump administration separately fired more than 130 members of CISA, the DHS confirmed. Read Article

National: Trump Dismantles Government Fight Against Foreign Influence Operations | Steven Lee Myers, Julian E. Barnes and Sheera Frenkel/The New York Times

The Trump administration is targeting government officials who had been flagging foreign interference in U.S. elections, despite ongoing concerns that adversaries are stoking political and social divisions by spreading propaganda and disinformation online, current and former government officials said. The administration has already reassigned several dozen officials working on the issue at the Federal Bureau of Investigation and forced out others at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, part of the Department of Homeland Security, they said. The cuts have focused on people who were not only combating false content online but also working on broader safeguards to protect elections from cyberattacks or other attempts to disrupt voting systems. In last year’s election, the teams tracked and publicized numerous influence operations from Russia, China and Iran to blunt their impact on unsuspecting voters. Read Article

National: The Trump Administration Is Going After Our Elections Too | Lawrence Norden and Derek Tisler/Slate

In its crusade against federal agencies, the Trump administration is targeting our election system, making potentially dangerous reductions to protections that help keep elections free, fair, and secure. On Friday, the acting director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency sent a memo to all agency staff notifying them that “all election security activities” would be paused pending the results of an internal investigation. The memo also stated that the administration was cutting off all funds to the Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center—a Department of Homeland Security–funded organization that helps state and local officials monitor, analyze, and respond to cyberattacks targeting the nation’s election hardware and software. Read Article

Arizona: Critics of new ballot security bill zero in on sponsor’s links to key vendor | Jen Fifield/Votebeat

Arizona Republican lawmakers are again proposing to require security features on the state’s ballot paper, but Democratic skeptics are responding by pointing to a potential conflict of interest involving the proposal’s leading advocate. State Sen. Mark Finchem’s bill, SB1123, would require the state to use ballot paper with specific security features — such as a hologram, barcode and watermark — that he says would ensure only “legitimate” ballots are cast in the state’s elections. Finchem, a Republican, attempted to get the requirements into law a few years ago, and they were written into the rules for a pilot program that the state approved funding for in 2022. But that pilot program was scrapped, amid concerns about the potential conflicts involved. Read Article

Georgia Republicans advance a plan to leave a bipartisan voter data group, despite warnings | Charlotte Kramon/Associated Press