Pennsylvania state House advances bill to give counties more time to count mail ballots | Carter Walker/Spotlight PA

Pennsylvania House Democrats are again pushing to allow counties time to process mail ballots before the day of the election. But the effort appears doomed because of the Senate GOP majority’s insistence on pairing the measure with an expanded voter ID law. A House bill passed Wednesday in a party line vote would allow counties up to seven days before election day to open ballot envelopes and run ballots through scanning machines, though results would still be tabulated on the day of the election. Currently, counties cannot begin processing mail ballots until the morning of the election, which means counties with large numbers of mail ballots may need additional days to finish counting and report complete results. Read Article

National: As Trump airs his election doubts, many supporters say they won’t accept a Biden win in 2024 | Alex Tabet, Jillian Frankel, Emma Barnett, Nnamdi Egwuonwu and Jake Traylor/NBC

More than six months out from the presidential election, many Republican voters harbor deep doubts not only about whether President Joe Biden is fit for a second term — but also about whether he can even win re-election fair and square. “I think that the powers that be on the Democratic side have figured out a way to circumvent democracy,” said Darlene Anastas, 69, of Middleborough, Massachusetts. Poll after poll has found that a large proportion of the Republican electorate believes the only reasons Joe Biden is president are voter fraud and Democratic dirty tricks, buying into former President Donald Trump’s baseless claims about the 2020 election. Trump continues to stoke those fires on the campaign trail. Read Article

National: RNC targets absentee ballots, voter rolls in 2024 to ‘protect’ vote | Erin Mansfield/USA Today

The Republican National Committee and its lawyers are going state to state seeking to influence what laws and procedures will govern the November election. The RNC, which has been overhauled with loyalists to former President Donald Trump, is reviving failed legal arguments from 2020 as it seeks to get involved in dozens of state and federal lawsuits. The cases are in all the major battleground states for 2024, but also in deep-red and deep-blue states. Some of the biggest ongoing cases target how absentee ballots are processed and who should be removed from voter rolls. If the cases are successful, fewer people will be allowed to vote in November, and fewer absentee ballots will be counted. Read Article

National: Inside the far-right plan to use civil rights law to disrupt the 2024 election | Sarah D. Wire and Mackenzie Mays/Los Angeles Times

A group called United Sovereign Americans is touring the U.S., spreading misinformation about election procedures and recruiting activists to challenge election results through lawsuits alleging civil rights violations. Led by Marly Hornik, the group aims to scrutinize voter rolls for errors and file lawsuits in multiple states, with the goal of preventing certification of election results unless substantial changes are made to election processes. Despite legal experts dismissing their arguments and concerns about the integrity of the electoral process, the group’s strategy could potentially sow doubts about the 2024 presidential election’s integrity if even one sympathetic judge rules in their favor. Read Article

National: A post falsely suggesting migrants illegally registered to vote spread to millions in four weeks | Nicole Acevedo/NBC

The rumor started as a post on X. The post published in early April misrepresented federal data from the Social Security Administration to falsely suggest that hundreds of thousands of migrants may have registered to vote in Pennsylvania, Arizona and Texas. One hour later, the tweet got the rocket fuel it needed to take off: X owner Elon Musk reposted it with the comment, “extremely concerning.”  In less than four days, the false narrative was widely shared on X, Facebook and Instagram. Donald Trump and Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene soon joined in, respectively proclaiming, “What is going on???” and “Are migrants registering to vote using SSN?” By the end of the month, the original tweet and Musk’s had generated more than 125 million views. Read Article

National: Will hackers, trolls and AI deepfakes upset the 2024 election? | Jeffrey Fleishman/Los Angeles Times

In the analog days of the 1970s, long before hackers, trolls and edgelords, an audiocassette company came up with an advertising slogan that posed a trick question: “Is it live or is it Memorex?” The message toyed with reality, suggesting there was no difference in sound quality between a live performance and music recorded on tape. Fast forward to our age of metaverse lies and deceptions, and one might ask similar questions about what’s real and what’s not: Is President Biden on a robocall telling Democrats to not vote? Is Donald Trump chumming it up with Black men on a porch? Is the U.S. going to war with Russia? Fact and fiction appear interchangeable in an election year when AI-generated content is targeting voters in ways that were once unimaginable. Read Article

Arizona may fund tool to allow candidates to verify election results, ballot by ballot | Jen Fifield/Votebeat

Arizona legislators are considering a proposal that would allocate $2 million from the state budget to develop a tool allowing election candidates to verify individual ballots in their races, aiming to increase transparency and address concerns about election integrity. Led by State Sen. Ken Bennett, Republicans endorse the initiative, which bypasses the traditional legislative process, prompting debate over privacy and potential misuse of election data. While supporters argue the tool would combat false claims of election fraud and bolster voter trust, critics, including Democratic Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, raise concerns about voter privacy and the potential for misuse of data before results are certified. Read Article

California: Two months to count election ballots? State’s long tallies turn election day into weeks, months | Micharl R. Blood/Associated Press

Nearly two months after the election, a recount settled the outcome in a Northern California U.S. House primary contest, breaking a mathematically improbable tie for second place but also spotlighting the lengthy stretch it took count the votes. Most California residents vote by mail, and in the pursuit of accuracy, thoroughness and counting every vote, the nation’s most populous state has gained a reputation for tallies that can drag on for weeks — and sometimes longer. Voting in the state’s primary election concluded on March 5. At time when many Americans have doubts about election integrity, a two-month stretch to tally votes in one House race “absolutely is a problem from an optics point of view,” said Kim Alexander, president of the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation, which seeks to improve the voting process. Read Article

Georgia’s election laws could create ‘hovering threat’ for poll workers in 2024 | Karissa Waddick/USA Today

Milton Kidd, an election administrator in Georgia since 2012, has observed significant changes in his work environment since the 2020 presidential election. Increased threats from voters and new regulations have strained resources and altered operations in his office. Over half of U.S. states have passed laws since 2021 that could restrict voter access and impede election administration, with former President Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson proposing legislation targeting noncitizen voting. In Georgia, new rules, including those awaiting Governor Brian Kemp’s signature, could further burden election officials and even subject them to criminal penalties. These changes, including heightened scrutiny and reduced timelines for runoff elections, have raised concerns among election workers about recruitment challenges and potential errors amidst tighter deadlines and increased complexity in their roles. Read Article

Michigan bills to overhaul election recount law pass Senate | Clara Hendrickson/Detroit Free Press

Recounts of Michigan ballot proposals in 2022 did not include a review of enough votes to change any election outcomes. But they left taxpayers with a hefty bill and election officials clamoring for changes to the law. Bills passed by Democrats in the state Senate Tuesday would require recount requests to petition for a review of a greater number of votes than the margin by which a candidate or ballot proposal lost. The legislation would also increase the upfront payment aggrieved candidates and ballot question committees must make and ease the restrictions that have excluded a significant number of votes from past recounts. The legislation next heads to the state House for consideration. Read Article

Pennsylvania: Democrats advance election bill long sought by counties to process ballots faster | Marc Levy/Associated Press

Pennsylvania’s House of Representatives on Wednesday approved a bill long sought by counties seeking help to manage huge influxes of mail-in ballots during elections in the presidential battleground state and to avoid a repeat of 2020’s drawn-out vote count. The bill comes barely six months before Pennsylvania could play a decisive role in selecting the next president in November’s election. The bill passed on party lines, 102-99, as Democrats backed it and Republicans opposed it, warning that it would open the door to fraud. Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, supports the bill, and on Wednesday issued a statement urging the Senate to pass it but it faces long odds in the Republican-controlled chamber. Read Article

Pennsylvania: Election officials in the US are under threat. A key county just faced a major test ahead of November | Sam Levine/The Guardian

Jim Rose, the director of administrative services in Luzerne county in north-eastern Pennsylvania, had been listening to the radio all morning and had not heard “a single peep” about problems at the polls during Pennsylvania’s primary on Tuesday. When he ran into Emily Cook, the county’s acting director of elections, she wasn’t ready to celebrate. It was, after all, only mid-afternoon, and the polls would be open until 8pm. “If you say that, you have to go outside, spin around on your left foot – it has to be your left foot – and throw some salt,” she said. … “I am very conscious of how important it is that I get this right, not just for the department or the county on the whole, but for my own job,” she said in her office. “It feels like a test and preparation for what comes in November.” Read Article

South Dakota: Three counties will vote on banning ballot tabulator machines, requiring hand-counting | Makenzie Huber/South Dakota Searchlight

Three South Dakota counties will ask voters during the June 4 primary if they should ban the use of tabulator machines in future local elections. If the measures pass, the auditor’s offices in each county would have to hand-count ballots in the Nov. 5 general election and thereafter. The votes – in Gregory, Haakon and Tripp counties – were forced by citizen-initiated petitions at the county level. The auditors in each county are now working to educate their citizens on the election process, including the accuracy and safety of tabulators, and highlighting the potential financial consequences of hand-counting ballots. Read Article

Texas: With lawsuits and recount petitions rising, some elections seem to go on forever | Natalia Contreras/The Texas Tribune

It has been 15 months since Democrat DaSean Jones was sworn in as a Harris County criminal district court judge. He’s presided over hundreds of cases since then. And he’ll be on the ballot again in November, this time for a seat on the Texas Supreme Court. But there’s an asterisk on his 2022 election win: His opponent, Republican Tami Pierce, is still challenging the outcome in court, arguing that there were “improper or illegal votes that shouldn’t have been counted” and that the election was “plagued with mistakes.” Her case is awaiting a ruling from a Bexar County visiting judge. It’s another example of a pattern officials and experts say they’re seeing around Texas in recent years: elections that just won’t end. Read Article

Wisconsin Republicans recruiting legion of monitors to observe polls, set stage for lawsuits | Molly Beck/Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

The Republican National Committee and Trump campaign are set to mobilize tens of thousands of volunteers and attorneys to monitor and potentially challenge voting processes in battleground states like Wisconsin, echoing former President Donald Trump’s baseless election claims and positioning the effort as a response to alleged “Democrat tricks” from the 2020 election. GOP officials aim to recruit 100,000 individuals nationwide for observing election processes, conducting regular training sessions, and focusing on various aspects of the electoral process, including early voting, absentee ballot processing, and post-election procedures. Read Article

National: Local election workers fear threats to their safety as November nears. One group is trying to help | Christina A. Cassidy/Associated Press

The Committee for Safe and Secure Elections is spearheading efforts to train local election workers across the nation to respond effectively to threats and coordinate with law enforcement, particularly in the lead-up to another highly charged presidential election. Led by former clerk Tina Barton, who experienced threats firsthand after the 2020 election, the committee aims to address the alarming rise in harassment and security concerns among election officials since then. These training sessions, held recently in Traverse City and attended by law enforcement and election workers alike, focus on preparing officials for various scenarios, from physical security risks to harassment and intimidation tactics. Read Articles

National: Cash-strapped election offices have fewer resources after bans on private grants | Matt Vasilogambros/Stateline

In the past four years, 28 states, including Wisconsin, have banned or restricted local governments from using private donations for election offices, equipment, or hiring poll workers, with conservative lawmakers citing concerns about partisan influence from donors like Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan. Despite court rejections of these claims, the debate highlights broader concerns about insufficient local government funding for election offices, affecting tasks from Election Day operations to maintaining voter rolls and equipment. While some states allocate federal grants for election security, inconsistency in funding and reliance on volunteers or donations pose significant challenges. Efforts to improve funding, including a recent $55 million congressional allocation for elections, face obstacles in securing sustained federal support. Read Article

National: New federal grants aimed to support elections. Many voting officials didn’t see a dime | Miles Parks/NPR

Election officials across the U.S. agree that elections are severely underfunded, with outdated equipment and insufficient resources for basic functions like recounts in Kentucky. While the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) allocated a portion of a multibillion-dollar grant program to election security, issues arose in how the money was used. Some election officials reported that funds were either not spent on reinforcing voting infrastructure or were allocated hastily without proper consultation, leading to ineffective use. Challenges included a rushed timeline for grant applications and a lack of expertise in determining election security needs. Read Article

National: The fear of noncitizen voting is as baseless as it has been for 200 years | essica Huseman/Votebeat

President Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson recently advocated for a bill banning noncitizen voting, despite it being illegal and not a significant problem. The move, widely seen as an attempt to garner political support, echoes historical tactics of fear-mongering over noncitizen voting, dating back to the 1800s. Various instances throughout history illustrate how such rhetoric has been used to influence public policy and disenfranchise certain groups. Trump’s persistent focus on this issue, despite lack of evidence, reflects a longstanding pattern of baseless claims. Read Article

National: A crush of lawsuits over voting in multiple states is creating a shadow war for the 2024 election | Christine Fernando/Associated Press

As Biden and Trump gear up for the upcoming election, the Republican National Committee (RNC), now reshaped under Trump’s influence, is actively filing election-related lawsuits in nearly half of the states, targeting various aspects of voting and election administration. With internal changes and pressure from Trump, the RNC’s legal maneuvers are expected to play a significant role in the lead-up to the November elections, aiding in campaign messaging, fundraising, and casting doubts on the validity of the election. Democrats and legal experts warn that these lawsuits could overwhelm election officials, undermine voter confidence, and pave the way for false narratives challenging the legitimacy of the 2024 election, potentially obstructing certification of results. Read Article

National: Trump campaign says it will deploy thousands of election workers to monitor poll sites | Alex Isenstadt/Politico

Former President Donald Trump’s political operation has announced plans to deploy over 100,000 attorneys and volunteers across battleground states for the upcoming November election, aiming to monitor and potentially challenge vote counting. Described as the most extensive election integrity program in history, it will include training for poll watchers, workers, and lawyers. This initiative reflects Trump’s persistent focus on election security, despite widespread conclusions that there was no significant fraud in the 2020 election. Trump’s warnings of potential Democratic rigging in 2024 mirror his previous false claims about the 2020 election, which he unsuccessfully attempted to overturn. Read Article

National: Former U.S. election agency head Steven Frid got unauthorized pay increase | Jen Fifield/Votebeat

An investigation conducted by another agency’s inspector general revealed that Steven Frid, the former executive director of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC), received a significant pay raise without the knowledge of EAC commissioners. The report also found that Frid expensed Harvard University courses without approval and failed to properly disclose personal leave. EAC commissioners unanimously voted to terminate Frid’s employment in December after learning of the investigation, marking the agency’s third executive director in as many years. The investigation detailed Frid’s actions, including obtaining an annual pay raise of $31,450 without approval, expensing leadership training courses at Harvard University without supervisor approval, and failing to report 96 hours of leave on his time-and-attendance records. Read Article

National: States Race To Counter AI Fakes Before the 2024 Election | Vera Bergengruen/Time

State officials across the U.S., prompted by concerns over the potential impact of AI-generated disinformation and deepfakes on the upcoming elections, have taken proactive measures to address the issue. Led by New Mexico Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver’s realization of the urgency at a conference, states are enacting laws requiring disclosure of AI use in political campaigns and criminalizing the intentional dissemination of misleading AI-generated content. These efforts, part of a broader trend, aim to balance First Amendment rights with safeguarding elections from malicious manipulation. Read Article

Arizona: US Supreme Court rejects Kari Lake, Mark Finchem in machine voting lawsuit, ending legal challenge | Stacey Barchenger/Arizona Republic

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal brought by Arizona Republicans Kari Lake and Mark Finchem, bringing finality to the duo’s legal effort challenging the use of electronic voting machines two years to the day after it began. Lake, a candidate for U.S. Senate, and Finchem, a candidate for state Senate, asked the nation’s top court to hear their case in mid-March. The court declined to consider it, making that official with an order on Monday that does not include details of the court’s decision. Legal experts had predicted the court would not exercise its discretion to add the case to its docket, citing well-established legal precedent and the court’s low acceptance rate. Read Article

Arizona: Inside the private company Maricopa County depends on to power through the last-minute ballot slog | Jen Fifield/Votebeat

After the polls close in Arizona’s presidential preference election, ballots arrive at Runbeck Election Services for processing, crucial in Maricopa County, the largest swing county in the U.S. These ballots, dropped off on Election Day, are among the last to be counted, as they require verification of voter signatures. Runbeck’s high-speed machines scan envelopes, facilitating the process. As election integrity comes under scrutiny, Maricopa County and Runbeck collaborate to expedite counting while ensuring transparency, with plans for a new election center. Questions arise about outsourcing the scanning process, but logistical challenges and the need for specialized expertise complicate efforts to bring the process in-house. Read Article

Connecticut towns want more money for early voting. Lawmakers say no way | John Moritz/CT Insider

Amid budgetary constraints at the State Capitol, local officials have been cautioned not to anticipate additional assistance for the ongoing implementation of early voting during the upcoming presidential election this fall. House Speaker Matt Ritter emphasized that while municipal aid might see an increase in funding, none of it would be designated for early voting support. With Connecticut becoming the 46th state to introduce in-person early voting during this year’s presidential primary, the cost burden on municipalities has been significant, with estimates ranging from $4,000 to $70,000 per town. Read Article

Georgia election officials and police prepare for voting dangers | Mark Niesse/The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Law enforcement and election officials are gearing up for potential threats to election security and workers in Georgia ahead of the upcoming elections. With concerns over escalating tensions and past incidents of threats, officials are conducting training sessions to prepare for worst-case scenarios, including dealing with disgruntled voters, aggressive poll watchers, and potential evacuation situations. Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger emphasizes the importance of ensuring safe and secure elections, acknowledging the contentious and polarized climate. Read Article

Idaho: Ada County Elections Office unveils online Ballot Verifier tool | Clark Corbin/Idaho Capital Sun

Ada County Elections officials have introduced a groundbreaking online Ballot Verifier tool, aiming to enhance transparency in elections. The tool allows the public to access scanned ballot images and corresponding cast vote records for all Ada County elections from 2022 onwards, without revealing voters’ personal details. By providing easy verification of tabulated ballots and vote records, officials hope to bolster trust in the election process. Previously, accessing such data required a public records request, but the new tool proactively makes it available online. Developed by a software company called Civera, the tool cost $40,000 for development and entails ongoing licensing fees. Read Article

Michigan:Trump and multiple Republicans named ‘unindicted co-conspirators’ in fake electors case | Craig Mauger/The Detroit News

Testimony from an investigator for Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office revealed that former President Donald Trump, along with his aides Mark Meadows and Rudy Giuliani, are considered unindicted co-conspirators in Michigan’s false elector case. This came to light during preliminary examinations where Nessel’s office is pursuing felony charges against 16 Republican activists who signed a certificate falsely claiming Trump won Michigan’s 2020 election. The effort, also mirrored in Arizona, aimed to bolster claims of election fraud. While defense lawyers argue their clients were unaware of the implications of signing the certificate, prosecutors maintain it was part of a larger multi-state criminal conspiracy linked to Trump’s campaign. Read Article

Ohio Supreme Court to hear open meetings lawsuit centered on Stark County voting machines | Robert Wang/Canton Repository

The Ohio Supreme Court is set to hear arguments regarding whether the Stark County Board of Elections violated the state’s Open Meetings Act by privately deliberating the purchase of Dominion voting machines. Look Ahead America, the plaintiff in the lawsuit, argues that such closed-door meetings hinder the public’s right to know about officials’ decision-making processes. However, even if Look Ahead America wins, it won’t reverse Stark County’s acquisition and use of 1,450 Dominion Voting Machines ICX touch-screen machines, as the funding and contract for the purchase were authorized by the Stark County commissioners. Read Article