Warren Stewart – Page 101 – The Voting News

Pennsylvania’s mail-voting law is constitutional, the state Supreme Court ruled Tuesday, upholding the 2019 measure that allows any voter to use mail ballots and removing a cloud of uncertainty heading into the midterm elections. The law dramatically expanded mail voting from a method that had been allowed only in a very small number of cases — about 5% of votes in any given election — to one used by millions over the last two years. It was the product of bipartisan negotiations between Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf and Republicans who control the state legislature, the biggest change to Pennsylvania election law in generations. But its implementation in 2020 came during both the first year of the pandemic and a heated presidential election. As massive numbers of voters cast ballots by mail, state and county elections officials tried to build out the system — in some cases triggering Republican outrage and lawsuits over their decisions. That was further stoked by then-President Donald Trump, who began attacking mail voting months before his loss to Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election. Republicans have continued to try to dismantle the law known as Act 77, with some saying it has been abused in its implementation, and others espousing bogus conspiracy theories about widespread fraud. The resulting partisan divide over a mail voting law that had been carefully negotiated — and trumpeted — by both Democrats and Republicans was on full display following the ruling Tuesday.

Full Article: Pennsylvania mail voting law Act 77 upheld by state Supreme Court

Texas: Harris County Commissioners Court OKs lawsuit over random state election audit | Dug Begley/Houston Chronicle

Harris County Commissioners Court, by a 3-2 partisan vote, agreed to explore legal options, including a possible lawsuit, to challenge the results of a random drawing by the Texas Secretary of State’s Office that means another round of election scrutiny for Texas’ largest county. “It ought to be the state of Texas that is audited,” said Precinct 1 Commissioner Rodney Ellis, who proposed the lawsuit. “This place has gone back to the bad old days.” Harris County learned last week it was one of two large counties chosen for an election audit by state officials, under new procedures lawmakers approved for election scrutiny. It is the second audit of Harris County, after another approved weeks following the 2020 general election. Procedures for the upcoming audit, which covers both the 2020 and 2022 elections, have not been outlined by the state yet, said Beth Stevens, Harris County’s interim elections administrator.

Full Article: A random Texas election audit: Commissioners Court OKs lawsuit

Texas: Lawsuit demands end to electronic voting machines in Lubbock County | James Clark/KLBK

Five people sued Lubbock County Commissioners Monday to stop the use of electronic voting systems. They also demanded “proper investigations and reconciliation” of elections in the last two years. The lawsuit demands, among other things, that Lubbock County “implement a precinct level hand-marked paper ballot and hand counting system.” The county already approved machines that keep a paper backup system in addition to the electronic records. The preliminary statement in the lawsuit, filed by Ashley Johnson, Beverly D. Burnett, Royce C. Lewis, Laura Lynne Phillips and Sheryl Ann Sherman – all representing themselves to be Lubbock County registered voters – said, “This action is not an election contest case.” The basic claim was that Lubbock County uses Hart InterCivic voting machines. The lawsuit also claimed these voting machines do not meet state standards and they are vulnerable to so-called “black box” antics by nations such as China.

Full Article: Lawsuit demands end to electronic voting machines in Lubbock County | KLBK | KAMC | EverythingLubbock.com

Wisconsin: Trump tries to topple a powerful Wisconsin Republican in his futile quest to reverse his 2020 loss | Reid J. Epstein/The New York Times

After months of toying with Robin Vos, who as the speaker of the Wisconsin Assembly is the most powerful Republican in state politics, former President Donald J. Trump endorsed Mr. Vos’s long-shot primary challenger on Tuesday in a futile effort to push the state’s Republicans to decertify the results of the 2020 election. Mr. Trump backed Adam Steen, a largely unknown and underfunded far-right Republican who said he would aim to claw back the state’s 10 Electoral College votes from 2020 — a legal impossibility — and enact sweeping changes to the state’s voting laws. Mr. Steen’s far-right views are not limited to elections. He is opposed to all abortions under any circumstances and he said in an interview on Monday that he would seek to make contraception illegal in Wisconsin. “This is way deeper than a political discussion. This is a moral issue,” he said. “To me, you’re ending a life. Yes, I would definitely outlaw contraception.” In his endorsement message, Mr. Trump blamed Mr. Vos for blocking efforts to conduct a “full cyber forensic audit” of the 2020 election and said he had “refused to do anything to right the wrongs that were done.” “Speaker Vos had 17 years to prove to Wisconsin residents that he has their best interest in mind, but even in his own campaign efforts, Vos has tried to mislead his constituents, sending out mailers that feature a picture he took with me — trying to make voters believe I am a Vos supporter, which I am not,” Mr. Trump said. “I do not come close to supporting him.”

Full Article: Trump, Angry About 2020, Tries to Oust Robin Vos in Wisconsin – The New York Times

State elections officials struggle with paper shortages, harassment, insider threats | Kira Lerner/Idaho Capital Sun

Elections officials from 33 states, gathered for a conference under tight security, warned that the next few election cycles will be affected by paper shortages and the potential for threats from inside elections offices. The meeting of the National Association of State Elections Directors last week was held with stringent security precautions, given the ongoing threats and harassment faced by elections officials across the country in the years since the 2020 election. Organizers didn’t publicly share the location of the meeting and attendees were instructed to keep name badges visible inside the conference rooms, but not to wear them outside the hotel. NASED executive director Amy Cohen said the group coordinated with federal, state, and local law enforcement for the event to protect the attendees who are dealing with serious security concerns. “Not every one of our members is dealing with the same level of concern, but when you’re all together, it doesn’t matter,” she said. “It’s the transitive property of risk.” Cohen said she worked closely with a physical security adviser for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, a federal agency which also sent representatives to the conference to give a presentation for election officials on the resources they have available to help them ensure the security of their election systems.

Full Article: State elections officials struggle with paper shortages, harassment, insider threats – Idaho Capital Sun

National: The Fake Electors Scheme, Explained | Alan Feuer and Katie Benner/The New York Times

The brazen plan to create false slates of electors pledged to former President Donald J. Trump in seven swing states that were actually won by Joseph R. Biden Jr. was arguably the longest-running and most expansive of the multiple efforts by Mr. Trump and his allies to overturn the results of the 2020 election. It was also one of the most confusing, involving a sprawling cast of pro-Trump lawyers, state Republican officials and White House aides in an effort that began before some states had even finished counting their ballots. It culminated in the campaign to pressure Vice President Mike Pence to use the false slates to subvert congressional certification of the outcome on Jan. 6, 2021 — and in the violent attack on the Capitol that unfolded as he refused to do so. The scheme had a vague historical precedent and was rooted, at least in theory, in a post-Reconstruction Era law designed to address how to handle disputed elections. But it was deemed illegal by Mr. Trump’s own White House Counsel’s Office. Even some of the lawyers who helped come up with the idea referred to it as fake and acknowledged that it was of dubious legality, according to a cache of email messages brought to light by The New York Times. The fake electors tactic caught the attention of state law enforcement officials around the beginning of this year, and soon became a focus of the inquiry being conducted by the House select committee investigating the events of Jan. 6. The plan has also figured prominently in an investigation that an Atlanta-area prosecutor is conducting into Mr. Trump’s alleged election meddling. And it is at the heart of the Justice Department’s own wide-ranging Jan. 6 inquiry.

Full Article: The Fake Electors Scheme, Explained – The New York Times

National: Garland promises ‘justice without fear or favor’ as DoJ digs into Trump’s January 6 role | Martin Pengelly/The Guardian

The US attorney general, Merrick Garland, said he would “pursue justice without fear or favor” in his decision on whether to charge Donald Trump with crimes related to the Capitol attack and his attempt to overturn the 2020 election, as news reports indicate the justice department’s investigation is heating up. The department is conducting a criminal investigation into the events surrounding and preceding the January 6 insurrection, an effort that Garland – speaking to NBC’s Lester Holt on Tuesday – called “the most wide-ranging investigation in its history”. News reports on Tuesday suggested the inquiry is homing in on Trump’s role. The Washington Post reported – according to sources who spoke on condition of anonymity – that investigators have specifically questioned witnesses about Trump’s involvement in schemes to overturn the vote, and received the phone records of Trump officials and aides, including former chief of staff, Mark Meadows. The New York Times also reported that federal investigators had directly questioned witnesses about Trump’s efforts, signaling an escalation. Responding to criticism that it is not acting quickly enough, Garland told NBC that the department was “moving urgently to learn everything we can learn about this period, and to bring to justice everybody who is criminally responsible for interfering with the peaceful transfer of power … which is the fundamental element of our democracy”.

Full Article: Garland promises ‘justice without fear or favor’ as DoJ digs into Trump’s January 6 role | Merrick Garland | The Guardian

National: 2020 Election Deniers Seek Out Powerful Allies: County Sheriffs | Alexandra Berzon and Nick Corasaniti/The New York Times

An influential network of conservative activists fixated on the idea that former President Donald J. Trump won the 2020 election is working to recruit county sheriffs to investigate elections based on the false notion that voter fraud is widespread. The push, which two right-wing sheriffs’ groups have already endorsed, seeks to lend law enforcement credibility to the false claims and has alarmed voting rights advocates. They warn that it could cause chaos in future elections and further weaken trust in an American voting system already battered by attacks from Mr. Trump and his allies. One of the conservative sheriffs’ groups, Protect America Now, lists about 70 members, and the other, the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, does not list its membership but says it conducted trainings on various issues for about 300 of the nation’s roughly 3,000 sheriffs in recent years. It is unclear how many sheriffs will ultimately wade into election matters. Many aligned with the groups are from small, rural counties. But at least three sheriffs involved in the effort — in Michigan, Kansas and Wisconsin — have already been carrying out their own investigations, clashing with election officials who warn that they are overstepping their authority and meddling in an area where they have little expertise.

Full Article: 2020 Election Deniers Seek Out Powerful Allies: County Sheriffs – The New York Times

National: Conspiracy-promoting sheriffs claim vast election authority | John Hanna and Christina A. Cassidy/Associated Press

The sheriff in Kansas’ most populous county says he took it for granted that local elections ran smoothly — until former President Donald Trump lost there in 2020. Now he’s assigned detectives to investigate what he claims is election fraud, even though there has been no evidence of any widespread fraud or manipulation of voting machines in 2020. Calvin Hayden in Johnson County, which covers suburban Kansas City, isn’t the only sheriff in the U.S. to try to carve out a bigger role for their office in investigating elections. Promoters of baseless conspiracy theories that the last presidential election was stolen from Trump are pushing a dubious theory that county sheriffs can access voting machines and intervene in how elections are run — and also have virtually unchecked power in their counties. Voting-rights advocates and election experts said any attempts by law enforcement to interfere in elections would be alarming and an extension of the threat posed by the continued circulation of Trump’s lies about the 2020 election. “What we have seen time and again is that those who support the ‘Big Lie’ find conduits to groups of people who they think can help perpetuate this conspiracy theory and erode confidence in elections and potentially cast doubt on them going forward,” said David Levine, a former election official who is now a fellow with the Alliance for Securing Democracy, a nonpartisan institute with staff in Washington and Brussels whose mission involves combatting efforts to undermine democratic institutions.

Full Article: Conspiracy-promoting sheriffs claim vast election authority | AP News

National: A Hidden New Threat to U.S. Elections | Blake Hounshell and Nick Corasaniti/The New York Times

It’s been more than nine weeks since the Pennsylvania primary. The election is still not certified. The reason: Three counties — Berks, Fayette and Lancaster — are refusing to process absentee ballots that were received in a timely manner and are otherwise valid, except the voter did not write a date on the declaration printed on the ballot’s return envelope. The Pennsylvania attorney general has argued in court amid a lawsuit against those three counties that the state will not certify results unless they “include every ballot lawfully cast in that election” (emphasis theirs). The standoff in Pennsylvania is the latest attempt by conservative-leaning counties to disrupt, delay or otherwise meddle with the process of statewide election certification, a normally ceremonial administrative procedure that became a target of Donald Trump’s attempts to subvert the 2020 contest. It’s happened in other states, too. Earlier this year, Otero County, a rural conservative area in southern New Mexico, refused to certify its primary election, citing conspiracy theories about voting machines, though no county commissioner produced evidence to legitimize their concerns. Eventually, under threat of legal action from the state’s attorney general and an order from the State Supreme Court, the commissioners relented and certified the county’s roughly 7,300 votes. Pro-democracy groups saw Otero County’s refusal to certify the results as a warning of potentially grave future crises, and expressed worries about how a state might be able to certify a presidential election under similar circumstances.

Full Article: A Hidden New Threat to U.S. Elections – The New York Times

Advocates for Arizona’s ‘fake electors’ plan had legal doubts, new report finds | Ronald J. Hansen/Arizona Republic

Some of those involved in submitting presidential electors for President Donald Trump in Arizona after he had lost the state in 2020 knew their plan was legally dubious and want to keep its low public profile as long as possible, according to a report published Tuesday. Citing previously undisclosed emails, the New York Times painted the picture of an effort in key swing states, including Arizona, the closest contest in the country, that was both desperate and probably wouldn’t pass legal scrutiny. Their plan was to submit papers to Congress suggesting Trump won the states, even though certified results showed then-President-elect Joe Biden had won them. Trump’s allies hoped the dual slates of electors would serve as a justification for slowing or reversing the Jan. 6, 2021, certification of Biden’s victory. After Vice President Mike Pence refused to consider the “fake electors,” a pro-Trump mob stormed the U.S. Capitol, halting the process for hours. Long before then, those pushing the long shot plan knew they stood on shaky ground, the Times reported. People familiar with the plan at the time have told The Arizona Republic that while the strategy was legally questionable, they didn’t view their activity as criminally wrong.

Source: Report shows Arizona electors knew of ‘fake election’ legal doubts

Arizona: Sharpie misinformation bleeds into primary | Ali Swenson/Associated Press

Election officials in Arizona’s largest county won’t soon forget #SharpieGate — the social media uproar that emerged after the 2020 election based on the false claim that Sharpie pens provided at the polls would ruin ballots before they were counted. Now, as Maricopa County gears up for Arizona’s primary election on Tuesday, it’s facing a repeat of the same false theories in response to an announcement by election officials that they were switching to Pentel brand felt-tip pens on Election Day. “DO NOT use the felt tip pen they will try to give you,” one Twitter user wrote Thursday. “#SharpieGate all over again in AZ. Bring your ball-point pens,” wrote another, in a tweet that called election officials “treasonists” and accused them of trying to “rig the primaries.” The county provides felt-tip pens to voters at the polls on Election Day because the pens have quick-drying ink that won’t smudge the ballots or produce wet splotches that jam up onsite tabulators. That can require the machines to be cleaned, causing long lines at the polls. Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer on Twitter urged those voting in Tuesday’s primary to “PLEASE PLEASE” use the provided pens to prevent machine problems and keep voting running smoothly.

Full Article: Pen misinformation bleeds into Arizona primary | AP News

Colorado: Group of Republican primary losers solicits funds to demand a recount | Zoe Schacht/Colorado Newsline

With time running out to request a recount of the Colorado primary election, Republican candidates who lost held a fundraising event in Colorado Springs Sunday evening. The event, “Colorado Recount Fundraiser,” included multiple losing candidates. During the event, speakers directed attendees and livestream viewers to visit the website of the Colorado Recount Coalition to donate to candidates. The website lists nine candidates, including Tina Peters and Ron Hanks, election conspiracy theorists who deny the results of the 2020 presidential election. Peters, the Mesa County clerk, was a candidate for secretary of state, and Hanks was a candidate for U.S. Senate. They previously submitted a request for a recount to the secretary of state’s office but failed to provide funds for the effort in time. “We know they cheated,” Peters said during the event. Claims that results of the primary election were compromised have not been substantiated. The Colorado Recount Coalition website says that candidates will be “demanding” a hand recount of the June 28 primary. But a hand recount is not possible, according to Annie Orloff, spokesperson for Secretary of State Jena Griswold. A recount can still be requested through Tuesday, but it must be conducted in the same manner as the original election, which was tallied through tabulation machines, Orloff said.

Full Article: Group of Colorado Republican primary losers solicits funds to demand a recount – Colorado Newsline

Georgia Prosecutor Has Donald Trump in Her Sights, and She’s Not Stopping | Norman Eisen and Amy Lee Copeland/The New York Times

Now that the House Jan. 6 committee’s initial hearings have concluded, this is a useful time to evaluate their actual impact. For that, we should look not to Washington but well south of the Capitol, to Atlanta. That’s because the hearings have turbocharged the investigation by the Fulton County district attorney, Fani Willis, into possible election interference and offenses by Donald Trump and his allies. Any charges in that investigation may define a big part of the committee’s legacy, even as it looks to extend its work into the fall. Normally, the primary question after congressional revelations like those we have heard would be whether there would be federal charges, as in Watergate. Here, the Justice Department may be contemplating possible actions, but Ms. Willis is further along. Her flurry of target letters to Georgians who formed an alternate slate of 2020 presidential electors strongly suggests she is considering charges. Ms. Willis has operated with calculated urgency since she opened her investigation in February 2021. She has moved from building a prosecution team and conducting voluntary interviews to convening a special grand jury to issuing those target letters (at least 16 of them) to the Republican electors who, despite Mr. Trump’s election loss in the state, covertly met to cast votes for him and submit an alternate electoral slate on Dec. 14.

Full Article: Opinion | This Georgia Prosecutor Has Donald Trump in Her Sights, and She’s Not Stopping – The New York Times

New Georgia election law allows any resident to challenge another voter’s eligibility | Mark Niesse/The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Bearing long lists of voters’ names, a determined group of Republicans is asking local election boards to cancel thousands of Georgia voter registrations, using a new power bestowed by the state’s voting law. These amateur operatives are trying to purge the registrations of people who they suspect have moved away based on voter lists, address records or property tax documents. They’re relying on Georgia’s law passed last year in the wake of Donald Trump’s defeat in the 2020 election that allows any voter to challenge the eligibility of an unlimited number of their neighbors, an effort that’s taking place outside the routine government-run process of removing people who have moved or died. It’s voter against voter, with conservatives taking matters into their own hands to police Georgia’s voter list. No fraud has been proved among registrants who moved from Georgia or used P.O. boxes as their addresses. These aggressive efforts to cancel voters jeopardized eligible voters such as Tracy Taylor, who is homeless and registered to vote at the address of a post office near historically Black colleges on Atlanta’s Westside. “If I had a residential address, I would be using it,” Taylor told the Fulton County elections board this month. “I’m trying to get back to a normal life.”

Full Article: New Georgia election law allows any resident to challenge another voter’s eligibility

Kansas appeals court says secretary of state violated open records law by altering computer system | Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector

Kansas Secretary of State Scott Schwab violated state open records law when he ordered a software vendor to disable the ability to produce a public record, the Kansas Court of Appeals ruled on Friday. The ruling is the latest victory for Davis Hammet, a voting rights advocate, in his three-year legal fight with Schwab over access to provisional ballot data under the Kansas Open Records Act. “By turning off the report capability, the secretary denied reasonable public access to that public record and the information within it,” Justice Stephen Hill wrote in the appeals court decision. “That action — choosing to conceal rather than reveal public records — violates KORA.” Each election cycle, Kansans cast tens of thousands of provisional ballots, many of which are discarded. Some of the issues can be corrected. A voter may have neglected to update their registration after moving, or an election official may question the validity of a signature on a mail-in ballot. Hammet, the president of Loud Light, which works to educate and engage young adults and underrepresented communities on elections in Kansas, has filed a series of requests for provisional ballot reports under the Kansas Open Records Act. The goal is to help voters have their ballots can be counted, and to research the issue to better advise public officials about policies that impact voters.

Full Article: Kansas appeals court says secretary of state violated open records law by altering computer system – Kansas Reflector

Montana judge strikes down election law targeting 18-year-old voters | Sam Wilson/Helena Independent Record

A state district court judge on Wednesday struck down a Republican-backed law preventing anyone who turns 18 before Election Day from getting a ballot before their birthday, finding that it infringes on young Montanans’ right to vote. Yellowstone County District Court Judge Michael G. Moses partially ruled in favor of a coalition of youth groups that challenged the law, along with other election-related legislation, last year. The group includes Montana Youth Action, the Forward Montana Foundation and the Montana Public Interest Research Group. “Young people’s participation in democracy is essential. Today, the court affirmed what we already knew: Restricting access to the ballot is an obvious wrong,” Kiersten Iwai, executive director at Forward Montana Foundation, said in an emailed statement. “Now, our newest voters can get involved at the earliest possible opportunity because they will have the same level of access to the ballot as all other Montanans.”

Full Article: Judge strikes down election law targeting 18-year-old voters | 406 Politics | helenair.com

In a Nevada county, election conspiracies sow deep distrust | Sam Metz/Associated Press

The Nye County Commission is used to dealing with all sorts of hot-button controversies. Water rights, livestock rules and marijuana licenses are among the many local dramas that consume the time of the five commissioners in this vast swath of rural and deeply Republican Nevada. Last spring, it was something new: voting machines. For months, conspiracy theories fueled on social media by those repeating lies about former President Donald Trump’s loss in 2020 inflamed public suspicions about whether election results could be trusted. In response, the commission put a remarkable item on its agenda: Ditch the county’s voting machines and instead count every vote on every ballot — more than 20,000 in a typical general election — entirely by hand. Commissioners called a parade of witnesses, including three from out of state who insisted voting machines could be hacked and votes flipped without leaving a trace. They said no county could be certain their machines weren’t accessible via the internet and open to tampering by nefarious actors. It was all just too much for Sam Merlino, a Republican who has spent more than two decades administering elections as the county’s clerk. She simply felt outgunned.

Full Article: In a Nevada county, election conspiracies sow deep distrust | AP News

New Mexico: US District Court judge OKs online publication of voter records | Morgan Lee/Associated Press

A conservative-backed initiative to publish voter registration records from across the country online for public consumption can move forward over the objections of New Mexico election regulators, a federal judge has ordered in a preliminary opinion. Albuquerque-based U.S. District Court Judge James Browning issued an order last Friday preventing New Mexico state prosecutors from pursuing allegations of possible election code violations against the creators of VoteRef.com. The VoteRef.com website provides searchable access to voter registration records by name and street addresses, often indicating when people voted in past elections. The online records do not say for which candidates the people voted or how they voted on initatives. Party affiliation is listed for voters in some states but not all. The Voter Reference Foundation that created the website advocates for voting accountability by making voter information more accessible to the public. Following the ruling, the foundation said it would post New Mexico voter rolls online starting Tuesday. The decision doesn’t apply to New Mexico voters enrolled in a confidential address program aimed at protecting victims of domestic violence and stalking.

Source: US judge OKs online publication of New Mexico voter records | AP News

Pennsylvania: Butler County auditing some 2020 mail-in ballots to gather information for future elections | Jesse Bunch/Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Officials in Butler County began an audit of ballots from the 2020 general and state elections on Wednesday — a move leaders said is a bipartisan effort to collect data on what it would take to conduct similar reviews for future elections. “We’re doing this as a way to understand what that type of a process would take, what that would look like time wise,” said Leslie Osche, a Republican and chair of the Butler County board of commissioners. … County Commissioner and Democrat Kevin Boozel called claims of widespread claims voter fraud from former President Donald Trump and politicians across the Republican party in the wake of that year’s election the “elephant in the room” during Wednesday’s public meeting. “Now everyone’s paying attention. Whether it’s right, wrong, or indifferent, our job, I feel, is about integrity,” Mr. Boozel said. “Do I like doing the 2020 review? Hell no. Do I believe that we owe it to people to be as transparent as possible, and if people want to see something, do we owe that to them? I do — with reason.” Mr. Boozel said he did not know how much it would cost the county for the review.

Full Article: Butler County auditing some 2020 mail-in ballots to gather information for future elections | Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Texas will audit 2022 midterm election results in four counties | Philip Jankowski/Dallas Morning News

The Texas secretary of state’s office selected the state’s most populated county and three others Thursday for an audit of election returns that will include the 2022 midterms. Cameron, Guadalupe, Eastland and Harris counties were picked at random under a provision of the 2021 omnibus election law that created the audit process. Cameron and Harris were chosen from a pool of Texas’ 18 counties with populations of 300,000 or more and Guadalupe and Eastland from counties with fewer than 300,000 people. Since the beginning of the year, the secretary of state’s office has been building a forensic audit department within its ranks. In November, Gov. Greg Abbott and top Republicans at the Legislature signed off on sending $4 million to the secretary of state’s office to staff up the division. The audits will begin immediately after November’s midterms and will also examine other non-primary elections, such as the May 7 vote on amendments to the Texas Constitution. The audit process came about after the Texas Legislature passed a sweeping election law, Senate Bill 1, in 2021 in reaction to fears over election security stoked by former President Donald Trump’s false claims of widespread fraud. Republicans led the charge in passing the bill over the objections of House Democrats, who took desperate measures to block its passage by stealthily walking out on 2021′s regular session and then much more visibly fleeing the state during a special session. Their efforts failed as several House Democrats quietly returned to Austin and allowed the House to gavel in with a quorum present.

Full Article: Texas will audit 2022 midterm election results in four counties

Utah: Judge tosses lawsuit from election conspiracy duo seeking 2020 voting data | Bryan Schott/Salt Lake Tribune

A judge tossed a lawsuit from a pair of Utah election deniers seeking detailed voting data from the 2020 election. Jen Orten and Sophie Anderson, known online as “The Two Red Pills,” filed suit against Utah, Juab and Millard counties, seeking voting machine data from the 2020 elections. In their lawsuit, Orten and Anderson asked for the “cast vote record” in those counties from the 2020 election, which is a record of when ballots from the election were counted by machine and logged into the system. The duo claimed since Utah law does not explicitly protect those records, they should be made available. Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson’s office filed a motion to dismiss in the suit, claiming Utah’s public records laws don’t apply because the data is an “election record,” which is exempted from GRAMA (the Government Records and Management Act). Utah law says all election materials must be sealed for 22 months after the results are certified and destroyed. Additionally, her office was skeptical about why the two were asking for the data. “Plaintiffs effectively want to contest the 2020 and 2021 elections results and thereby cast doubt on county and state administration of elections,” Henderson’s motion reads.

Full Article: Judge tosses lawsuit from Utah election conspiracy duo seeking 2020 voting data

Wisconsin: Dane County elections committee calls for greater security for equipment, clerks | Chris Rickert/Wisconsin State Journal

Describing the security of election equipment as “inadequate” and threats to elections workers as a “serious problem,” a Dane County task force on Monday called for hardening the county’s election infrastructure in the wake of a 2020 presidential election that many Republicans continue to falsely claim was tainted by systemic fraud or outright stolen. A report by the nine-member Election Security Review Committee does not make specific recommendations for how much more should be spent or on what, although during a press conference held over Zoom, Dane County Clerk Scott McDonell said he’d like to see a dedicated climate-controlled building, with cameras and other security, to store voting machines and other equipment. The committee also was not able to obtain specific figures from local or federal law enforcement on how many threats were made against the county’s election workers or whether any of those were investigated and led to prosecutions. But a survey of the county’s municipal clerks found that 84% of respondents said threats against election officials have increased in recent years, with 70% saying they were at least “somewhat concerned” for their safety or the safety of their staffs and 78% saying they worried about being harassed over the phone or on the job. Fifty of the county’s 62 clerks’ offices responded to the survey.

Full Article: Dane County elections committee calls for greater security for equipment, clerks | Local Government | madison.com

National: Elections officials urged to prepare for shortages, delays | Scott Bauer/Associated Press

Elections officials from across the country meeting under heightened security were urged Tuesday to prepare for supply chain issues that could lead to shortages in paper used for everything from ballots to “I voted” stickers for years to come. The summer meeting of the National Association of State Election Directors brought together nearly 200 people, including elections directors from 33 states, experts in election security, interest groups that work with elections, vendors and others. Election security experts told the directors to be prepared for possibly years of supply chain issues affecting paper, computer hardware and other things. The supply chain as it affects elections may not return to normal until 2026, said Ed Smith, a longtime election technology and administration veteran who chairs a federal government-industry coordinating council that works on election security issues. The lead time to obtain election hardware is two- to three-times longer than the norm, a delay not seen since 1999 or 2000, Smith said. Costs are also higher and elections officials should be prepared for spotty and unpredictable problems due to transportation and pandemic-related shutdowns, he said.

Full Artic le: Elections officials urged to prepare for shortages, delays | AP News

National: A Jan. 6 Mystery: Why Did It Take So Long to Deploy the National Guard? | Mark Mazzetti and Maggie Haberman/The New York Times

As the House committee investigating Jan. 6 used its prime-time hearing on Thursday to document President Donald J. Trump’s lack of forceful response to the attack on the Capitol by his supporters, it again raised one of the enduring mysteries of that day: Why did it take so long to deploy the National Guard? The hearing did not fully answer the question, but it shed light on Mr. Trump’s refusal to push for troops to assist police officers who were overrun by an angry mob determined to halt the certification of the 2020 presidential election. The mobilization and deployment of National Guard troops from an armory just two miles away from the Capitol was hung up by confusion, communications breakdowns and concern over the wisdom of dispatching armed soldiers to quell the riot. It took more than four hours from the time the Capitol Police chief made the call for backup to when the D.C. National Guard troops arrived, a gap that remains the subject of dueling narratives and finger-pointing. The hearing featured the testimony of Matthew Pottinger, the deputy White House national security adviser, who resigned in protest on the day of the attack. On that day, Mr. Pottinger had an urgent discussion with the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, about why National Guard troops had not been deployed to the Capitol.

Full Article: Why Did It Take So Long to Deploy the National Guard on Jan. 6? – The New York Times

National: New and familiar threats loom over midterms, election officials tell Congress | Benjamin Freed/StateScoop

Many of the cybersecurity, disinformation and resource challenges that election administrators have long faced are as present as ever in 2022, a panel of election officials told the House Homeland Security Committee on Wednesday. Added in this year is a steady clip of insider threats posed by actors inside government, as well as a rising tide of explicit threats of violence made against officials and their families.

Cybersecurity measures, staffing challenges, financial resources and stronger relationships with law enforcement were all tossed about during the nearly three-hour hearing, with many speakers noting the strain the threat landscape has placed on election administrators nationwide.

“Election officials have found themselves victims of harassment and threats in a way we have never seen before,” said Rep. Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y., the committee’s vice chairman. “As a result, election offices across the country are struggling to retain a trained staff, exacerbating the existing challenges associated with administering the 2022 midterm elections.”

Insider threats were a major topic of conversation when the National Association of Secretaries of State gathered earlier this month in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. But those concerns are often accompanied by a rise in verbal threats and harassment. Testifying remotely, New Mexico Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver said that in the weeks since a showdown with a county commission over its refusal to certify primary election results — with commissioners citing disproven conspiracy theories about vote-counting equipment — she and her employees have received numerous threats that were referred to law enforcement.

Full Article: New and familiar threats loom over midterms, election officials tell Congress – StateScoop

National: The People Who Count Our Elections—or Can Grind the Process to a Halt | Quinn Yeargain/Bolts

The certification of President Biden’s win in Michigan was in serious doubt after the 2020 election. In Detroit’s Wayne County, the Republican members of the board of canvassers initially refused to certify the results, citing baseless allegations of “irregularities” in several local precincts. Under pressure, the local board eventually and unanimously certified the results. But the Republicans on the state’s canvassing board renewed their objections to Detroit’s vote count until one Republican’s decision to greenlight the results allowed the process to move forward. The 2020 election exposed more than any other how the mechanics of vote counting rely on a convoluted series of decisions by individual officials. Many are imbued with powers that, depending on how they wield them, can grind the machinery of democracy to a halt, as is made clear by the revelations about former President Donald Trump’s plot to convince state and local officials to deny the results of the 2020 election. Even when their tasks are ceremonial, the system may still hinge on their operating in good faith and without desire to overturn an election. Trump and his allies have only intensified their focus on this sea of decision-makers, building strength. The Republican Party in Michigan has replaced many of its members on canvassing boards with representatives who do not say whether they would have certified the 2020 election, including in Wayne County. In Wisconsin, one of the GOP members of the state’s elections commission—the body tasked with certifying results—actively participated in the efforts to overturn Biden’s win in 2020. The commission’s chair, another Republican, is silent on the legitimacy of the 2020 election. Elsewhere in the country, election deniers are running for secretary of state or other critical local offices like county clerk and election judge, often with vows to intervene in upcoming elections; and local elections officials have faced persistent harassment from proponents of the Big Lie.

Full Article: The People Who Count Our Elections—or Can Grind the Process to a Halt | Bolts

National: Russia Election Threat Persists Amid War in Ukraine, Officials Say | Adam Goldman/The New York Times

Top national security officials warned on Tuesday about the continuing threat of election interference from abroad, emphasizing that Russia could still seek to meddle or promote disinformation during the 2022 midterm races even as it wages war in Ukraine. “I am quite confident the Russians can walk and chew gum,” Christopher A. Wray, the F.B.I. director, said during a cybersecurity conference in Manhattan, where he spoke alongside Gen. Paul M. Nakasone, the head of the National Security Agency and U.S. Cyber Command. Iran and China also remained potent threats, mounting their own campaigns to undermine American democracy, the officials said. “The Russians are trying to get us to tear ourselves apart,” Mr. Wray said. “The Chinese are trying to manage our decline, and the Iranians are trying to get us to go away.”

Full Article: Russia Election Threat Persists Amid War in Ukraine, Officials Say – The New York Times

National: FBI director expects onslaught of digital assaults targeting midterm elections | Suzanne Smalley/CyberScoop

Federal law enforcement officials are preparing for a wave of multilayered cyberattacks and influence operations from China, Russia and Iran in the run up to November’s midterm elections, FBI Director Christopher Wray said Tuesday. Wray pointed to a multi-pronged 2020 Iranian cyber campaign to intimidate and influence American voters, saying officials expect to see more such incidents in the coming months. The risks posed to the American public by “relatively modest hacking” increase exponentially when foreign governments layer such efforts with influence operations and disinformation that “causes panic or lack of confidence in our election infrastructure,” Wray said during a cybersecurity conference at Fordham University in New York City. Officials worry about how the impact of such threats might be magnified by what Wray called “multidisciplinary” cyber operations. The FBI is working closely with U.S. Cyber Command to manage election threats and when the two agencies are in “combat tempo” their respective teams are in touch every two hours at a minimum, Wray said.

Full Article: FBI director expects onslaught of digital assaults targeting midterm elections

Editorial: Preventing the Next Jan. 6 Riot | Wall Street Journal