Editorials: The Fragile Future Of Democracy In Afghanistan | Eurasia Review
Afghanistanâs ongoing presidential election, if successful, will mark the first transfer of power via an election in that countryâs history. Election does not necessarily imply democracy. Afghanistanâs previous two presidential elections, both won by incumbent Hamid Karzai, saw ubiquitous election fraud and there are legitimate questions about how representative one leader or political party can be in a country so fraught with sectarian and tribal divisions. Nowhere are these divisions more apparent than in the central challenge of selling the whole process of democracy to the Afghan people. Afghanistanâs divisions are manifested partly in the readiness of many Afghans to pursue other avenues when the State looks less than functional, which is its usual condition. Presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah who withdrew from the 2009 election to protest Karzaiâs election fraud has threatened to create a âparallel state,â by force if necessary, if the currently disputed outcome cannot be resolved. This willingness on Abdullahâs part is suggestive of many things, most important of which may be a lack of confidence that the central government can effectively represent more than one of Afghanistanâs many groups at a time. Abdullah nominally represents Tajik interestsâthe northern part of the countryâdespite his own mixed ancestry. Ashraf Ghani, the other candidate, has more widespread support among Pashtuns. The challenge all parties face is in trying to make this election more than a contest to see which ethnic group has more voters.