Texas: ‘My Vote Was Rejected’: Trial Underway Over New Voting Law | Edgar Sandoval/The New York Times
A trial is underway in San Antonio, Texas, regarding the state's controversial election overhaul known as S.B. 1, which was passed in 2021 by a Republican majority. The law introduced new voter identification requirements for mail-in voting, made it harder to use voter assisters, set criminal penalties for poll workers, and banned 24-hour voting and drive-through voting. Critics argue that the law disproportionately affects voters with disabilities, elderly voters, and those who do not speak English. The trial is providing an opportunity for affected voters to share their experiences. Read ArticleTexas: What’s at stake in the long-awaited trial over sweeping 2021 elections law | Natalia Contreras/The Texas Tribune
The trial for the legal challenge against Texas Republicans' voting and election law overhaul, known as Senate Bill 1, began in federal court in San Antonio. More than 20 state and national organizations have brought lawsuits against the law, claiming it violates federal laws including the Voting Rights Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, and constitutional amendments. The law, passed in 2021, faced criticism from Democrats who argued it was based on unfounded voter fraud claims. Plaintiffs argue that certain provisions of the law make it more difficult for voters of color to cast their ballots, with some alleging this effect was intentional. The trial is expected to last until late October, with a decision possibly coming months later. The case could potentially impact elections and voting in 2024, though appeals could prolong the process. Read ArticleTexas law abolishing Harris County elections office goes into effect | Jen Rice/Houston Chronicle
Harris County Clerk Teneshia Hudspeth and Harris County Tax Assessor-Collector Ann Harris Bennett have assumed responsibility for running elections and voter registration following the implementation of a new Texas state law that abolished the elections administrator's office in Harris County. Senate Bill 1750, which applies only to Harris County, eliminates the appointed elections administrator role and reverts the duties for overseeing elections to the county clerk and voter registration to the tax assessor-collector. A separate law, Senate Bill 1933, allows the state to remove elected officials if a "recurring pattern of problems" is not addressed. Critics argue that these changes are politically motivated and may hinder voter access. Read ArticleTexas: Harris County Commissioners Court to hold public discussion on elections office transition ahead of November | Jen Rice/Houston Chronicle
Harris County Commissioners Court is preparing for a public discussion about a significant reorganization of elections administration duties ahead of the November election. The reorganization follows the implementation of a new state law that abolishes the Elections Administrator's office and transfers the responsibility of running elections and voter registration to the Harris County Clerk and Harris County Tax Assessor-Collector. Commissioners Court is also expected to vote on the distribution of elections office staff positions, with 131 positions going to the county clerk's office and 39 positions to the tax assessor-collector's office. This transition has been criticized for its lack of transparency, and it comes after a series of challenges and changes in election leadership within Harris County. Read ArticleTexas officials can’t toss mail ballots over ID mistakes, federal judge rules | Cayla Harris/San Antonio Express-News
A federal judge has ruled that a provision of Texas Senate Bill 1, which rejected nearly 40,000 absentee ballot submissions due to errors like mismatched numbers, violates the Civil Rights Act. The court found that these errors are not material in determining whether voters are qualified under Texas law to vote by mail. The decision is seen as a win for Texas voters, especially those who rely on mail-in ballots due to disabilities or age, and is aimed at ensuring that eligible voters' ballots are not rejected based on minor errors or omissions. This ruling follows concerns about the impact of the law, especially on minority voters, who were 50% more likely to have their mail ballots rejected, according to a study. Read ArticleTexas Supreme Court denies Harris County request to run November election and delay state law | Jen Rice/Houston Chronicle
The Texas Supreme Court has denied Harris County's request for an emergency order that would have allowed the Harris County Elections Administrator's Office to oversee the upcoming November election. This decision clears the way for Senate Bill 1750, a new state law abolishing the office, to go into effect on September 1. The county had sought an emergency order to delay the law's implementation while the state's appeal was pending. The Supreme Court's decision means that Harris County Clerk Teneshia Hudspeth and the Harris County Tax Assessor-Collector Ann Harris Bennett will be responsible for overseeing the election, which is now just weeks away. Read ArticleTexas judge blocks state-mandated changes to Harris County elections | Natalia Contreras/The Texas Tribune
The Texas attorney general’s office has appealed a judge's decision to temporarily block a new law passed by Republicans that aimed to abolish the elections chief position in Harris County, Texas. A Travis County district judge ruled that the law is unconstitutional and would disrupt the fall's elections. The law would have required the county to eliminate the elections administrator position and transfer election duties to the county clerk and the tax assessor-collector. The appeal was filed in the Texas Supreme Court, keeping the judge's order from taking effect. The decision is part of a larger debate about state authority over elections in Texas. Read ArticleTexas judge says no quick ruling expected over GOP efforts to toss 2022 election losses near Houston | Associated Press
A Texas judge overseeing Republicans' challenges to losses in the 2022 elections in Houston has indicated that a quick ruling shouldn't be expected after a trial where no GOP voters testified that they were unable to vote due to ballot shortages or delayed poll openings. The disputed races are all in Harris County, controlled by Democrats, and the trial was marked by a lack of testimonies from voters, with Republican lawyers relying on party-generated theories. The judge expects to issue a ruling in the coming weeks. Harris County's elections have been under scrutiny due to various issues in recent elections, and similar court challenges have emerged around the country following baseless conspiracy theories about the 2020 presidential election. Read ArticleTexas to Leave ERIC, a Voting Integrity Group Targeted by Right-Wing Attacks | Neil Vigdor/The New York Times
Texas has decided to withdraw from the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), a bipartisan voter integrity group that maintains accurate voter rolls. The state cited rising membership costs due to declining enrollment and a new state law requiring alternatives for crosschecking voter lists as reasons for the decision. ERIC, which helps prevent duplicate voter registrations and ensures voting accuracy, has faced attacks and defections from other Republican-led states after false claims that it is a voter registration tool for Democrats and has ties to liberal donors. Texas is the largest member of the coalition, which has lost several other states since last year, and its departure further destabilizes the organization. Read Article
