National: Election disinformation campaigns targeted voters of color in 2020. Experts expect 2024 to be worse | Christine Fernando/Associated Press
Community organizations are bracing for an increase in disinformation campaigns targeting communities of color and immigrant communities as the 2024 election approaches. During the 2020 election, false claims, often tailored to specific communities, spread on social media, impacting the perceptions and trust in the voting process among people of color. Tailored disinformation targeted topics of importance to each community, exploiting their fears and past experiences in their home countries. Language barriers and reliance on translated content for voting information also contributed to the spread of misinformation. Advocates are urging social media companies to invest in content moderation and fact-checking in languages other than English, while government and election officials should make voting information more accessible to non-English speakers and organize media literacy trainings in community spaces to combat disinformation. Read ArticleGeorgia election security upgrades considered after Capitol meeting | Mark Niesse/The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Georgia election officials are considering a faster and more extensive rollout of upgrades to Dominion voting machines in response to concerns over election security. Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced a plan for election equipment testing and audits to ensure voting equipment's accuracy ahead of the 2024 presidential campaign. The move comes after a federal judge unsealed a report by a computer scientist that identified "critical vulnerabilities" in the voting system. Dominion's voting system has faced criticism since the 2020 election, especially from Republican supporters of Donald Trump. The upgrades will not be installed in counties preparing for local elections this fall, but Raffensperger signaled a willingness to move forward in other counties. 'Read ArticleActivists for hand-counting ballots don’t acknowledge drawbacks: More mistakes, time, and money | Jessica Huseman/Votebeat
The effort to expand hand-counting ballots in elections continues despite evidence that it is less accurate, more time-consuming, and costly compared to using tabulators. Advocates claim hand-counting is straightforward, but in reality, it involves complex processes, requiring many people, time, and space, leading to increased opportunities for errors. Hand-counting is less efficient in the United States even when limited to a single race, and the country’s lengthy ballots make hand-counting even more impractical. Academic studies show that hand-counting ballots is more error-prone than tabulating with scanners. The real-world examples of Nye County, Nevada, and Cyber Ninjas’ efforts in Arizona demonstrate the challenges and inaccuracies of hand-counting. Hand-counting prolongs the process, giving less time to resolve issues with smudged marks, difficult-to-read write-in candidates, and provisional ballots. Tabulators should be used for standard ballots, while humans adjudicate unclear ballots and write-in candidates for accurate counting. Read Article
National: Head of US cybersecurity agency sees progress on election security, with more work needed for 2024 | Christina A. Cassidy/Associated Press
The head of the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), Jen Easterly, announced plans to strengthen election system protection by hiring 10 additional election security specialists who will interact directly with state and local officials. Despite significant progress in safeguarding election systems since the 2016 presidential election, there are growing concerns about emerging threats, such as generative artificial intelligence tools that can create false and misleading content. CISA aims to work collaboratively with federal, state, and local agencies to defend the integrity and resilience of elections, while also countering misinformation and foreign influence campaigns. Easterly emphasized that the vote itself will be protected and secure, and the agency remains committed to being a nonpartisan, non-political entity focused on security as a non-partisan mission. Read Article
National: Meta’s Threads needs a policy for election disinformation, voting groups say | Dara Kerr/NPR
Threads, the new social media platform launched by Facebook's parent company Meta, has gained tens of millions of users in less than a month. However, voting rights groups are concerned as Threads has not outlined a plan to curb election disinformation on the site. The groups, including Vote.org and End Citizens United, sent a letter to Meta asking for a robust plan to ensure strong election policies are in place, especially with the 2024 election cycle approaching. While Meta claims that Facebook's rules apply to Threads, the voting rights groups argue that a standalone policy is necessary to clarify implementation and enforcement. Read ArticleNational: ‘Local elections are at risk’: Senator Warnock reintroduces legislation to stop election interference | Ambria Burton/Georgia Public Broadcasting
Georgia Sen. Raphael Warnock has reintroduced the Preventing Election Subversion Act of 2023 in Congress to protect local state election administrations from partisan interference and address challenges with voter registration. The bill aims to limit the baseless removal of local election officials, allowing removal only for specific reasons, and provides a federal cause of action to enforce this standard. It also addresses voter challenges by requiring personal knowledge to support each individual challenge and aims to prevent the targeting of specific demographics based on their beliefs or background. Warnock's bill comes after a study showed that at least 20 states have introduced bills focused on election interference, raising concerns about partisan subversion and interference in the democratic process. Read ArticleNational Association of Counties Adopts Resolution Urging Congress to Protect Election Officials from Threats, Intimidation | Kevin Kinnally/Conduit Street
The National Association of Counties (NACo) has passed a resolution urging Congress to impose appropriate penalties for threats and intimidation against public servants responsible for fair elections. The resolution calls for legislation to penalize offenses such as harassing or intimidating election officials, threatening them or their families, attempting to pressure officials to violate state law or the Constitution, and disseminating personal information about them. Election officials are facing increased attacks, with nearly one in three experiencing harassment, abuse, or threats. Read ArticleNational: First Findings Shed Light on Role of Social Media Algorithms in 2020 Election | UT News
An academic team from multiple universities collaborated with Meta to study the impact of social media on the 2020 U.S. election. The researchers found that algorithms had a significant effect on what users saw on their feeds, but changing the algorithms for a few months did not impact participants' political attitudes. The study, co-led by researchers from the University of Texas at Austin and New York University, aimed to understand the influence of social media on American democracy. Despite altering various aspects of Meta's algorithm for three months during the election period, including removing reshared content and changing to a chronological feed, there were no significant effects on political polarization or ideological extremity. Further research from the project will provide insights into the content and behavior on the platforms. Read ArticleNational: AI Disinformation Drives Lawmaker Fears About 2024 ‘Wild West’ | Oma Seddiq and Amelia Davidson/Bloomberg
As the 2024 elections approach, lawmakers are facing a short timeframe and lack of consensus to address the threat of deepfakes, which could manipulate and shape the outcome of the elections. The increased use of artificial intelligence by political campaigns has surpassed the efforts of Congress, political parties, and regulators to address the technology's potential for disinformation. Some Democrats have introduced bills to require labeling on political advertisements that use AI, but Republicans have been slow to support such legislation. Congress is still grappling with understanding the rapidly evolving technology and may be months away from introducing comprehensive legislation to address AI's threats in elections. In the meantime, political ad spending on deepfakes is expected to increase, raising concerns about the spread of false and misleading content to voters. Read ArticleNational: Trump condemned Jan. 6 rioters, now he’s become a big supporter | Jill Colvin/Associated Press
Former President Donald Trump, who initially condemned the violence of the January 6, 2021 Capitol rioters, has now evolved to downplaying the violence, praising the rioters as patriots, and spreading false claims about the attack. He is currently the early front-runner in the 2024 Republican presidential primary and has vowed to pardon a "large portion" of Jan. 6 defendants if he wins a second term. He has also fundraised for them, befriended their families, and collaborated on a song featuring Jan. 6 defendants singing "The Star-Spangled Banner" over a prison phone line. Trump's evolution comes as Republicans, public opinion, and some in Congress have sought to recast the mob as nonviolent and downplay the severity of the attack. Read ArticleGeorgia: Republican promoters of election fraud approve ballot hand-counts | Justin Glawe/The Guardian
The elections office in Spalding County, Georgia, which is run by Republicans promoting falsehoods about the 2020 election, has approved a motion to implement automatic hand recounts for all future elections. The decision requires elections staff to hand-count each ballot and compare the totals with those reached by voting tabulation machines. Hand counts are slower and less reliable than machine tabulations. The lone Democrat on the board initially supported the idea but objected when the Republicans did not consider the costs to taxpayers. Read ArticleDisinformation reimagined: how AI could erode democracy in the 2024 US elections | Nick Robins-Early/The Guardian
Experts are concerned about the potential impact of AI-generated disinformation on elections. The rise of artificial intelligence tools that can create realistic images, mimic human voices, and write human-like text is making it easier to produce and spread deceptive political content on a massive scale. Such content not only threatens to deceive audiences but also erodes trust in the information ecosystem. AI-generated disinformation can be used for voter suppression, spread misinformation to target specific groups, and create false constituencies. Campaigns have already begun dabbling in using AI-generated content for political purposes, and there are concerns that the proliferation of such content will make fact-checking difficult and corrode public trust in information. Read ArticleNational: Democrats rally around election proposal as counterpoint to GOP plan | Justin Papp/Roll Call
Democratic lawmakers, joined by public interest groups, are promoting the bicameral bill known as the Freedom to Vote Act, which aims to expand voting access, prevent partisan gerrymandering, and curb the influence of dark money in elections. The bill has been reintroduced after stalling in the Senate during the 117th Congress. Democrats argue that the proposed legislation is essential to protect democracy, while Republicans are pushing their own plan called the American Confidence in Elections Act, which includes voter ID requirements and restricts federal government access to political donor rolls. The Republicans' bill has been labeled the "Big Lie Bill" by Democrats, who claim it aims to suppress specific groups of voters, especially Black voters and voters of color. Both bills are part of the ongoing debate over voting rights and election integrity in the United States. Read Article