National: This White House Plan Threatens Funding for Disabled Voters | Lisa Song/ProPublica

A proposed Office of Management and Budget (OMB) rule would prohibit organizations from using federal grant money for voter registration drives or related nonpartisan registration activities. Spearheaded by OMB Director Russell Vought, the administrative policy change targets federal grants, including accessibility funding awarded under the Help America Vote Act that non-profit advocacy groups rely on to assist disabled and elderly voters at nursing homes and care facilities. While legal scholars and disability advocates criticize the rule as an unauthorized administrative overreach that will effectively disenfranchise vulnerable populations, OMB officials defend the proposal as part of a broader effort to prevent federal taxpayer funds from financing voter registration drives. Read Aerticle

Colorado voters could see more poll monitors during the midterm election | Sara Wilson/Colorado Newsline

Common Cause Colorado and its partners are preparing to expand a longstanding, nonpartisan election protection program during the midterm election with around 1,000 volunteer poll monitors, up from around 300 in 2024. “These are neighbors and folks of all political affiliations who are united around one purpose: to support their neighbors to vote, to watchdog the process, keep the vibes positive and ensure that voters have the help they need at the polls,” Aly Belknap, executive director of Colorado Common Cause, said. “The function of a poll monitor is to provide a culture of safety and support at the polls, and this is all part of preventing intimidation and political violence,” she said. The effort is part of the Election Protection Coalition, which also includes Disability Justice, formerly known as Disability Law Colorado, Mi Familia Vota, the League of Women Voters Colorado and the Colorado Lawyers Committee. Election observers and poll monitors are normal parts of American elections. Read Article

North Carolina: Mail-in ballot dispute scheduled for Oct. 14 federal court hearing | The Carolina Journal

A U.S. District judge has scheduled an October 14 federal court hearing in Winston-Salem to hear arguments on a preliminary injunction challenging North Carolina's newly implemented mail-in ballot regulations. The lawsuit, filed by voting rights organizations alongside the Elias Law Group, alleges that the State Board of Elections' new Republican majority rushed through eleventh-hour rules on September 4 - the exact day absentee ballots began going out - without public input. Plaintiffs argue that the new guidelines, which mandate the rejection of absentee ballots submitted in unsealed inner envelopes without an opportunity to cure and permit standardless signature matching across county boards, violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the Civil Rights Act by threatening to arbitrarily disenfranchise thousands of voters. Read Article

Wisconsin election observers trained by GOP to target voting machines | Jen Rice/Democracy Docket

The Republican National Committee is piloting a targeted observer program in Wisconsin to closely monitor voting machines, adding heightened partisan scrutiny to election processes in the swing state. Drawing from private RNC training recordings, observers are instructed to track tabulator serial numbers, inspect machine tamper seals, and report any technical or procedural discrepancies directly to party legal teams via dedicated hotlines. Voting rights advocates warn that this expanded surveillance operation marks a significant escalation beyond traditional poll watching and could cause delays for voters at polling locations. Read Article

Michigan: Effort to recall Antrim County Clerk accused of changing voters’ registration statuses gets go-ahead from state board | Hayley Harding/Votebeat

The Michigan Board of State Canvassers has approved recall petition language against Antrim County Clerk Victoria Bishop, giving organizers the green light to begin gathering signatures to force a recall vote. The approved petition stems from allegations that Bishop overstepped her statutory authority by making unauthorized changes to the state's Qualified Voter File—including directly canceling voter registrations—which led the Michigan Bureau of Elections to suspend her system access earlier this year. Organizer Ashley Areeda and recall supporters must now gather 4,500 valid signatures from registered county voters within a 60-day window to place the recall on an upcoming ballot, while Bishop's counsel indicated she is reviewing appeal options and maintains she looks forward to presenting her case to voters. Read Article

A California sheriff seized ballots. The court ruling shutting the probe will resonate nationwide | Jeremy Herb and Tierney Sneed/CNN

the California Supreme Court has halted Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco's unlawful seizure of 650,000 ballots, setting a major judicial precedent aimed at protecting chain-of-custody protocols ahead of November. The court ruled that allowing law enforcement unfettered, secret access to count ballots poses a direct threat to election integrity, ordering Bianco to return the seized materials from a 2025 referendum. Driven by concerns over similar law enforcement interference—including an earlier FBI seizure of 2020 ballots in Fulton County, Georgia—California and other states have enacted strict new notification requirements and criminal penalties for illegal ballot seizures, while legal scholars work to educate magistrates on chain-of-custody safeguards when evaluating warrants targeting voting materials. Read Article

Louisiana has no records backing $100M voting-machine estimate | Nolan McKendry/The Center Square

Louisiana election officials have told lawmakers that replacing the state’s 35-year-old voting machines will cost about $100 million, but the Secretary of State’s Office has admitted to possessing no documentation or records to substantiate its estimate. Legislative fiscal analysts noted that the true final cost remains unknown until a specific vendor and security framework are selected to replace the current direct-recording electronic machines with a voter-verifiable paper-trail system. While state officials plan to fund the overhaul using the Voting Technology Fund alongside federal grants, the absence of line-item documentation behind the high-profile price tag has raised fresh questions among state leaders as Louisiana attempts to finalize a vendor selection. Read Article

National: Judge Blocks FEMA From Tying Antiterrorism Grants to Election Changes | Scott Dance/The New York Times

A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from conditioning annual counterterrorism and emergency preparedness grants on states altering their voting procedures. U.S. District Judge Amir H. Ali ruled that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) exceeded its legal authority when it warned local governments that up to 20 percent of their $1 billion in annual preparedness funding would be withheld unless they moved toward paper ballots or implemented citizenship verification checks. Prompted by a lawsuit from local governments in Tennessee, Texas, and Ohio, the court ordered FEMA to strike the election-related prerequisites from its grant application process, rejecting the administration's attempt to use counterterrorism funding to compel local election changes aligned with President Trump's voter fraud claims. nytimes.com

National: Second Prosecutor Quits Trump’s ‘Grand Conspiracy’ Case | Alan Feuer/The New York Times

Senior prosecutor Kurt Olsen has resigned from the Justice Department's "grand conspiracy" investigation, marking the second high-profile prosecutor to quit the probe in less than a month. Olsen, a Trump loyalist with no prior prosecutorial experience who previously pushed to overturn the 2020 election results, stepped down following security clearance complications that hindered his access to classified materials relevant to the inquiry. His departure follows the sudden exit three weeks prior of lead prosecutor Joseph diGenova—who resigned after DOJ leadership grew impatient with his delay in bringing charges—as well as the departure of a lead FBI investigator and the earlier removal of a career prosecutor who found insufficient evidence for charges. Read Article

National: Inside Trump’s plan for the ‘biggest DOJ election observer effort in history’ | Gabe Cohen and Tierney Sneed/CNN

CNN reports that President Donald Trump and his allies inside and outside his administration are aiming to blanket polling places with an expanding network of party and federal election monitors this November, intensifying scrutiny of the nuts and bolts of voting as Trump hunts for what he claims, without evidence, is widespread cheating and fraud in US elections. The Justice Department plans to dispatch over 1,000 monitors—a historical high—including newly hired political appointees who previously helped challenge Trump’s 2020 election defeat or, in one case, pleaded guilty to illeagally accessing a county election website. Concurrently, secret RNC training materials reveal a nationwide pilot program deploying "special monitors" specifically instructed to inspect voting machine serial numbers, photograph results tapes, and feed potential discrepancies directly to a legal hotline. While officials insist the initiatives comply with standard legal protocols, election administrators and voting rights advocates warn that aggressive federal and partisan surveillance, which already caused friction in primary states like Wyoming, is designed to amplify minor technical errors into grounds for contesting unfavorable election results. Read Article

National: As AI images become common, the threat to elections draws alarm: ‘How will voters know what’s true?’ | George Chidi/The Guardian

Driven by cases like a viral, manipulated photo of a Georgia mayor, political strategists, advocates, and lawmakers warn that the proliferation of hyper-realistic digital fabrications is fostering a pervasive environment of skepticism where voters struggle to distinguish authentic news from computer-generated disinformation. Compounding the challenge, patchwork state regulations governing AI disclaimers face serious enforcement hurdles and First Amendment legal challenges—such as a federal judge halting Montana’s deepfake law—leaving federal regulatory vacuums that allow deceptive campaign materials to spread across digital platforms virtually unchecked. Read Article

National: Democrats sue over Pentagon’s changes to voter forms for Americans overseas | Maegan Vazquez/The Washington Post

The Democratic National Committee has filed a lawsuit against the Pentagon and the Office of Management and Budget over last-minute, emergency changes to the primary voter-registration form used by service members and citizens living abroad. The lawsuit challenges the Trump administration's sudden removal of a key registration option for overseas citizens who have never resided in the U.S., such as adult children of American expats—which forces them off the standardized federal form and onto state-specific application processes. Voting rights advocates and election administrators condemned the administration for manufacturing a fake "emergency" to bypass public comment periods and push restrictive ID updates weeks before the midterms, warning that altering the Federal Post Card Application on such short notice will trigger severe confusion and disenfranchise eligible voters overseas.Read Article

National: Renewed CISA support comes too late for midterm prep, some election officials say | David DiMolfetta/Nextgov/FCW

Nextgov/FCW reports that state and local election officials are warning that the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) newly renewed election security offerings are arriving too late to meaningfully assist with midterm preparations. Following drastic staff cutbacks and budget slashes driven by Trump administration spending cuts and long-standing political grievances over the agency's 2020 anti-disinformation efforts, local administrators—especially in smaller, less-resourced jurisdictions—say crucial advisory relationships were severed and cannot simply be rebooted weeks before voting begins. While larger jurisdictions have built in-house monitoring systems and intend to accept federal assistance only in emergency scenarios like foreign cyberattacks, experts emphasize that the sudden dismantling of dedicated federal support has severely eroded intergovernmental trust on the eve of the election. Read Article

Georgia election board pushes back on GOP plan to fix voting system flaw | Sudhin Thanawala/Associated Press

The Georgia State Election Board has pushed back on an emergency proposal by the Republican National Committee and state GOP to reconfigure election software just weeks before early voting begins. As reported by the Associated Press, two Republican members on the board spoke out against their party’s last-minute plan to address ballot-privacy flaws, warning that rushing through software changes on the eve of the midterms would "do more harm than good" and trigger administrative chaos. Consequently, the board adjourned without taking a vote, halting the GOP's high-stakes effort to force an immediate overhaul of the state's touchscreen voting system. Read Article

Texas officials knew of issues with its voter registration web portal in March, records show | Natalia Contreras/Votebeat

Natalia Contreras at Votebeat reports that Texas state officials were warned as early as March 2026 about severe defects in the Department of Public Safety's (DPS) online voter registration portal, long before a massive backlog of at least 500,000 delayed voter records was dumped on local county election administrators right before the November midterm election. Despite DPS's assurances in March that a programming error had been resolved, warnings from voting rights groups continued through the summer, revealing that software updates to DPS systems were dropping critical registration data and leaving many voters unknowingly unregistered when they attempted to cast ballots. With county officials now scrambling to manually process the backlogged records to avoid forcing affected voters onto provisional ballots, state lawmakers from both parties are launching inquiries into the communication breakdowns and lack of system testing between DPS and the Texas Secretary of State's Office. Read Article