Trump supporters are pushing to prohibit machine counting of ballots in future elections around the country, which election officials say could make vote-counting slower, more expensive and — most importantly — less accurate. Legislators in at least six states this year have introduced proposals to prohibit the use of ballot tabulating machines. Local jurisdictions in Nevada, New Hampshire and elsewhere have also been considering similar measures. The proposals stem from baseless conspiracy theories stoked by former President Donald Trump since the 2020 election, in which he and others contended that election machines around the country were hacked and votes were flipped. The push has gained some traction in the last month. In Arizona, a bill that would require hand counts of ballots for all elections passed out of a legislative committee. And in Nevada, a deep-red county’s board of commissioners — spurred on by a Trump-aligned candidate to be the state’s top election officer — formally urged its election clerk to abandon machine counting. ... More than 90 percent of registered voters live in jurisdictions where in-person voters use a paper ballot of some form, but hand counting of ballots is extremely rare. A bit more than 800 jurisdictions nationwide — covering 0.6 percent of registered voters — primarily count either in-person or mail ballots by hand, according to Warren Stewart, a data analyst at the Verified Voting Foundation, which advocates for election security measures.
National: Midterm mess: States grapple with poll worker and paper shortages | Fredreka Schouten and Kelly Mena/CNN
National: New Right-Wing Conspiracies Threaten to Further Starve Local Election Systems | Spenser Mestel/Bolts
Michael Gableman, a former Wisconsin supreme court justice who said state election officials “stole our votes” days after Donald Trump lost the 2020 presidential race, was granted wide latitude by Republicans to investigate voter fraud last year: a budget of $676,000, subpoena power, and months to pursue leads. But the report on the 2020 election that he presented to state lawmakers earlier this month was the usual hodgepodge of Trumpian recommendations, including decertifying the presidential results and outright eliminating the state’s election commission. Buried in the report was one proposal that has gone largely unnoticed, but is rapidly gaining steam as a new conservative cause celebre. Gableman called on Wisconsin to exit the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), which is a national organization that assists states in maintaining accurate voter rolls. Thirty states and the District of Columbia are part of ERIC, from Democratic Illinois to Republican Texas, but this bipartisan organization exploded on the radar for “Stop-the-Steal” activists after the far-right website Gateway Pundit published stories attacking it in January. The website falsely tied ERIC to George Soros, the billionaire philanthropist who supports an array of progressive causes, calling it a “left wing voter registration drive disguised as voter roll clean up,” even though ERIC is governed and financially supported by its member states. Full Article: New Right-Wing Conspiracies Threaten to Further Starve Local Election Systems | BoltsNational: Coordinated phishing campaign targeted election officials in nine states, according to FBI | AJ Vicens/CyberScoop
An invoice-themed phishing campaign targeted elections officials in at least nine states in October 2021, according to a warning the FBI issued Tuesday. The attackers sought to steal login credentials and could have had “sustained, undetected” access to election administrators’ systems, the notice said. The emails — sent in batches on at least three separate days — “shared similar attachment files, used compromised email addresses, and were sent close in time, suggesting a concerted effort to target US election officials,” the notice reads. It’s unclear whether any of the phishing attacks were successful. The FBI did not immediately respond to a request for comment. “The FBI judges cyber actors will likely continue or increase their targeting of US election officials with phishing campaigns in the lead-up to the 2022 midterm elections,” the notice reads. Phishing campaigns targeting election administrators through vendors, businesses, or other means was part of the Russian election interference campaign during the 2016 elections. In that case, emails purporting to be from Florida-based elections equipment vendor VR Systems was sent to 122 email addresses “associated with named local government organizations,” according to a National Security Agency assessment of the campaign. According to the new FBI warning, on Oct. 5, 2021, “unidentified cyber actors” sent emails originating from at least two email addresses to unidentified officials in nine unnamed states and to representatives of the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS). The emails contained the same attachment titled “INVOICE INQUIRY.PDF,” which would redirect targets to a credential-harvesting website. Full Article: Coordinated phishing campaign targeted election officials in nine states, according to FBINational: Some states take steps to protect election workers as threats increase | Barbara Rodriguez/The 19th News
The people kept showing up at the small Northern California office where Natalie Adona and her co-workers help run elections. Three days in a row, they came to try to push a petition for recall elections, refusing to wear masks despite a mandate and physically pushing their way into the office, according to legal documents. Adona and her colleagues asked for a restraining order against the three people, worried about the trio who they say kept showing up to harass them at their jobs. A judge granted it, then later extended it for one of the people, finding “clear and convincing evidence” that the same person “engaged in unlawful violence or made a credible threat of violence.” An attorney for the trio has denied wrongdoing. The elections office briefly shut down walk-ins. Adona, who is an assistant clerk-recorder for the Nevada County Elections Office, said she has experienced several panic attacks. She still worries about her colleagues. "It was a really unfortunate incident that led to me and my staff feeling pretty afraid,” Adona told The 19th. “Certainly, I think that having a restraining order is an extreme way to settle a problem that I would have liked to have sort of settled by other means. But the circumstances and our county counsel felt it appropriate to go in that direction.” Full Article: Some states take steps to protect election workers as threats increaseNational: New Focus on How a Trump Tweet Incited Far-Right Groups Before Jan. 6 | Alan Feuer, Michael S. Schmidt and Luke Broadwater/The New York Times
Federal prosecutors and congressional investigators have gathered growing evidence of how a tweet by President Donald J. Trump less than three weeks before Jan. 6, 2021, served as a crucial call to action for extremist groups that played a central role in storming the Capitol. Mr. Trump’s Twitter post in the early hours of Dec. 19, 2020, was the first time he publicly urged supporters to come to Washington on the day Congress was scheduled to certify the Electoral College results showing Joseph R. Biden Jr. as the winner of the presidential vote. His message — which concluded with, “Be there, will be wild!” — has long been seen as instrumental in drawing the crowds that attended a pro-Trump rally on the Ellipse on Jan. 6 and then marched to the Capitol. But the Justice Department’s criminal investigation of the riot and the parallel inquiry by the House select committee have increasingly shown how Mr. Trump’s post was a powerful catalyst, particularly for far-right militants who believed he was facing his final chance to reverse defeat and whose role in fomenting the violence has come under intense scrutiny. Extremist groups almost immediately celebrated Mr. Trump’s Twitter message, which they widely interpreted as an invitation to descend on the city in force. Responding to the president’s words, the groups sprang into action, court filings and interviews by the House committee show: Extremists began to set up encrypted communications channels, acquire protective gear and, in one case, prepare heavily armed “quick reaction forces” to be staged outside Washington.
Full Article: New Focus on How a Trump Tweet Incited Far-Right Groups Before Jan. 6 - The New York TimesEditorial: Merrick Garland Has More Than Enough to Investigate Trump | Timothy L. O’Brien/Bloomberg
A federal judge thinks that former President Donald Trump likely committed fraud — and probably knew it — when he and one of his lawyers, John Eastman, plotted to block Congress’s certification of the 2020 presidential election so Trump could hold on to power. So how much longer will it take Attorney General Merrick Garland to draw the same conclusion about that attempted coup? Perhaps Garland has already gone down that path. But there are no outward signs that he is investigating Trump with an eye toward a possible criminal prosecution. He has every reason to be circumspect, of course, but he has no reason to ignore the mounting evidence of Trump’s crimes. The latest reminder of what’s at stake came in Monday’s ruling from David Carter, a U.S. District Court judge in California. “Dr. Eastman and President Trump launched a campaign to overturn a democratic election, an action unprecedented in American history,” Judge Carter noted in his Monday ruling. “The plan spurred violent attacks on the seat of our nation’s government, led to the deaths of several law enforcement officers, and deepened public distrust in our political process.” While ordering Eastman to turn over relevant email correspondence with Trump to the bipartisan House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, Carter was also clear-eyed about the scope of his and the committee’s powers. Full Article: Merrick Garland Has More Than Enough to Investigate Trump - BloombergColorado County Clerks Association vow to defend democracy against election deniers | Ella Cobb/Daily Camera
Boulder County Clerk and Recorder Molly Fitzpatrick wants Colorado voters to know that thousands of dead people did not vote in the 2020 election. This rumor was one of several that Fitzpatrick and other Colorado county clerks refuted during a news conference hosted by the Colorado County Clerks association on Sunday outside the Denver Elections Division in Denver, where Republican, Democratic and unaffiliated clerks gathered to address allegations of election fraud put forth by election deniers and conspiracy theorists. In the past two years, election conspiracists have targeted Colorado clerks, citing fraud and security issues within Colorado’s election systems. Some of these false claims have ranged from accusations that China hacked Colorado’s voter registration database to reports claiming that Colorado’s voting systems are not properly certified. Fitzpatrick sought to set the record straight. “Unfortunately, over the last several months, there have been claims from election deniers that purport to prove fraudulent elections in Colorado,” Fitzpatrick said. “These claims are often lengthy, and they’re often full of jargon, and they do not provide proof or data. They consistently demonstrate a lack of understanding of our process. Full Article: Colorado County Clerks Association vow to defend democracy against election deniersGeorgia senators vote to strip controversial parts of elections bill | Mark Niesse/The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
A Georgia Senate committee voted unanimously Tuesday to remove every contentious proposal from a broad elections bill, discarding plans for GBI fraud investigations, paper ballot inspections and funding limitations. The decision to advance a stripped-down bill sets up a showdown in the final days of this year’s legislative session, when lawmakers will attempt to negotiate a final version. The Senate Ethics Committee scrapped much of the bill after hearing testimony Monday from several county election officials who opposed strict ballot handling rules and restrictions on outside donations from nonprofit organizations. One elections supervisor called its requirements little more than “security theater.” Senators shrank the 39-page bill to a two-page measure Tuesday, leaving only a requirement that businesses give workers up to two hours off to vote either on election day or during three weeks of early voting. Under current law, workers are only entitled to time off to vote on election day.
Full Article: Georgia senators vote to strip controversial parts of elections bill
Indiana: Cost to add paper trail for voting machines will be more than $1 million in some counties | Margaret Menge/The Center Square
Two counties in Indiana now using paperless voting machines will each require an estimated $1.2 million worth of additional equipment to add a paper audit trail before the next presidential election. A bill signed earlier this month by Gov. Eric Holcomb requires paper backups for all voting machines in the state by July 1, 2024. Specifically, it requires the 59 counties that use MicroVote voting machines, which are all-electronic and don’t involve a paper ballot, to have “voter verifiable paper audit trail” – or vvpat –printers to retrofit all machines by July 1 of 2024. The printers attach to the MicroVote Infinity voting machines with a cord, and contain a roll of paper tape, similar to cash register tape, that voters can view behind a glass window to verify their selections are correct before casting their vote. In Allen County, the Director of Elections Amy Scrogham says it will cost about $1.2 million to buy vvpats for all of their MicroVote machines. The county has 715 machines, but only 160 vvpats. “We haven’t used them yet,” she says of the vvpats, explaining she decided not to start using them for the first time during the 2020 election, fearing it would overburden election workers who were already dealing with pandemic-related issues. In Hamilton County, Elections Administrator Beth Sheller said the last estimate from MicroVote was a cost of $2,230 for each vvpat printer and a case to carry it in. Hamilton County, she says, has 693 MicroVote voting machines and now has 150 vvpats. Full Article: Cost to add paper trail for voting machines will be more than $1 million in some Indiana counties | Indiana | thecentersquare.comKentucky secretary of state praises latest election bills that will make voting easier and speed the statewide transition to paper ballots | Bruce Schreiner/Associated Press
Amid the flurry of action in Kentucky’s legislature this week, two election-related bills passed that will make voting easier and speed the statewide transition to paper balloting, Secretary of State Michael Adams said. Unlike some states, where measures setting election rules have sparked bitter partisan fights, the two Kentucky measures cleared the GOP-dominated legislature with bipartisan support. The bills — sent to Gov. Andy Beshear — are a follow up to a high-profile election measure enacted last year with bipartisan backing that expanded early voting in Kentucky. Adams, a Republican, urged the Democratic governor to sign the latest measures, which delved into a range of election-related issues — including election security and voting access. “Together, these bills will make voting easier, expand our existing audit process, add much needed legal protections for our election workers and speed up our transition to universal paper ballots,” the secretary of state said Wednesday.
Full Article: Kentucky secretary of state praises latest election bills | AP NewsMichigan: GOP elections bills vetoed by Whitmer could have canceled some voters’ registrations | Clara Hendrickson(Detroit Free Press
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer vetoed a pair of GOP bills Friday that would have required hundreds of thousands of voters to take steps to stay registered. The Secretary of State's Office initially worked with lawmakers to develop the bills following a 2019 report from the state's auditor that recommended improvements to Michigan's voter list maintenance. But Republican lawmakers made changes to the legislation the Secretary of State's Office said would add unnecessary costs and open the door to errors. The GOP bills passed on a party-line vote in the state Senate while only a handful of Democrats supported the legislation in the state House. The elections bills aimed at cleaning up Michigan's voter rolls targeted voters with unknown birth dates and those who haven't cast a ballot in decades. The bills would have required those voters to complete a form mailed out by election officials, undergo signature verification and provide identifying information to ensure they could vote in future elections. Whitmer wrote in her veto letter that the bills "do not advance the goal of improving Michigan elections" and said "they would burden clerks and voters while increasing costs to Michigan residents."
Full Article: Gretchen Whitmer vetoes GOP elections bills targeting voter rollsNevada: Commissioner ‘not giving up’ on efforts to switch Washoe County to paper ballots | Mark Robison/Reno Gazette Journal
Jeanne Herman is not done trying to switch Washoe County’s election process to paper ballots – but she faces an uphill battle with continued opposition from fellow commissioners. This week, the Washoe County commissioner representing District 5’s mostly rural areas submitted a single-item resolution. It was a much simpler effort than her controversial 20-item election-overhaul proposal that was rejected in a 4-to-1 vote March 22 at a board meeting featuring seven hours of contentious public comment. “It appeared that it was too complicated for them to handle the original resolution,” she told the RGJ in a phone call about the four commissioners who voted against her plan: Chair Vaughn Hartung, Kitty Jung, Bob Lucey and Alexis Hill. “They weren’t able to discern how to do it or discern whether they had any appetite to do it so I thought, ‘OK, let’s start with first grade. Let’s do one at a time.’” The new lone proposal focuses on paper ballots. That was one of the previous resolution’s items, along with hand-counted results and a beefed-up law enforcement presence at voting sites.
Full Article: Jeanne Herman still wants to switch Washoe County to paper ballots