Indiana GOP election division leaders resign | Niki Kelly/Indiana Capital Chronicle

The top two Republicans at the Indiana Election Division have tendered their resignations, effective May 6 — the day after the primary election. Co-director Brad King is retiring after 24 years in the role and a host of accomplishments to his name. Co-General Counsel Valerie Warycha, who is supporting GOP Secretary of State candidate David Shelton, is also leaving. King and Warycha work alongside the Democratic co-director and co-general counsel in the Indiana Election Division, which is part of Secretary of State Diego Morales’ agency. He is seeking renomination at state convention this summer. Read Article

Kansas lawmakers overturn governor’s veto, approving voting system changes | Colin Wood/StateScoop

Kansas state lawmakers on Thursday overturned a veto by Gov. Laura Kelly, on a bill that she said would “suppress civic engagement and make it harder for Kansans to vote.” The legislation now to be enacted is the SAVE Kansas act, which directs the Kansas secretary of state to regularly check voter rolls, using a new, controversial tool offered by the federal government called the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements system. That tool, originally designed to check whether noncitizens were eligible for various benefits, has been repurposed by the second Trump administration to root out noncitizen voting, despite it being exceptionally rare. Kansas’s law also puts new security requirements on the websites used to collect voter registrations. They must use the .gov domain and meet nine other security requirements, including that data is transmitted using “encryption in transit,” that encryption standards are aligned with those set by the National Institute of Standards and Technology and that audit logs are maintained. Read Article

Michigan Bureau of Elections says Antrim County clerk improperly changed, canceled voter registrations | Hayley Harding/Votebeat

The Michigan Bureau of Elections is demanding answers from a controversial county clerk who reportedly canceled or changed voters’ registrations when she wasn’t supposed to. The bureau sent a letter to Antrim County Clerk Victoria Bishop on Tuesday saying it had received information suggesting she had made voter registration changes “that fall outside the scope of your statutory authority and fail to comply with the law.” Bishop, a Republican, was first elected in 2024 on a platform of cleaning up Antrim County’s voter roll. She is associated with the wing of the Republican Party that claims the 2020 election was stolen from President Donald Trump. The bureau learned that Bishop, who took office in 2025, apparently sent confirmation and cancellation notices — essentially, notices sent by election officials when they believe a voter has moved — to an unknown number of voters who didn’t vote in the last two major elections. However, the bureau noted in the letter, “Michigan law is explicit that a clerk may not cancel, or cause the cancellation of, a voter’s registration solely because a voter has missed one or two elections.” Read Article

North Carolina to feed data to Homeland Security under new noncitizen removal rules | Kyle Ingram/Raleigh News & Observer

The North Carolina State Board of Elections on Thursday approved a new process for partnering with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to remove potential noncitizens from the voter rolls. The rules, which the board’s Republican majority passed in a 3-2 vote, formalize the board’s new agreement with Homeland Security, which will run potentially millions of voters at a time through its citizenship databases. The state could begin uploading voter data to DHS as early as Friday. The board’s two Democrats fiercely opposed the rules, saying they did not trust DHS to provide the state with accurate data and believed it could disenfranchise eligible voters. “We are now saying you have to carry your papers,” board member Jeff Carmon said. Read Article

South Dakota: ‘Absolute chaos’: State, local officials disagree on path forward amid delay in early voting | Makenzie Huber/South Dakota Searchlight

County auditors and the state’s lead election official disagree about how to handle a delay of early and absentee voting for the June 2 primary election in South Dakota. Codington County Auditor Brenda Hanten told local media on Wednesday that the county would begin early and absentee voting on time by using sample ballots as the county waits for official ballots, under the guidance of South Dakota Secretary of State Monae Johnson. Hanten walked back those plans on Thursday, telling South Dakota Searchlight she hadn’t yet discussed the plan with her state’s attorney when she made those comments. Codington County will not use sample ballots and will wait until official ballots are mailed. Read Article

Texas counties receive subpoenas for voters’ records from Department of Homeland Security | Natalia Contreras/Houston Public Media

At least three Texas counties last week either received or were told they would soon receive administrative subpoenas from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The department is seeking detailed records about some individual voters, including their registration applications and voter history, though counties don’t yet know which ones. The subpoenas appear to be linked to a series of efforts by the Trump administration to verify the citizenship of registered voters. In December, Texas turned over the state’s voter roll to the Justice Department. The transfer included voters’ identifiable information such as dates of birth, driver’s license numbers, and partial Social Security numbers. It did not include, however, voters’ registration applications or signatures — the state does not have access to that information, which is kept by county voter registrars. Lubbock County’s elections administrator, Roxzine Stinson, said she met with a Homeland Security representative who informed her she would soon receive a subpoena seeking additional information for at least 10 voters, and potentially up to 30. Stinson said she’ll seek guidance from the county’s legal department on how to respond. The Homeland Security representative told Stinson, “all 254 counties will be contacted,” she said. Read Article

Some Utah voters weigh unregistering because of new law lifting certain privacy protections | Katie McKellar/Utah News Dispatch

When David Yoder — a registered Utah voter living in South Jordan — got a letter from the lieutenant governor’s office earlier this month notifying of changes to Utah’s voter privacy law, he said he was left “fed up and frustrated.” As an IT worker, Yoder told Utah News Dispatch he’s “very protective of my privacy,” and he knows how information like names and addresses can be used for scams or other malicious reasons. He’s also concerned about that information becoming more easily accessible during a time of heightened political tension and online vitriol on social media. “I don’t want my name and address publicly available to anyone,” he said, while expressing concerns that he has a “real problem” with allowing that information to be “available for purchase.” Even though the new law, SB153, criminalizes misusing the information — like posting the information online for free or otherwise — by making it a class A misdemeanor, Yoder worries that’s not going to stop it. Read Article

Wisconsin: How Rock County got new clerks ready for Supreme Court election | Alexander Shur/Votebeat

Town of Lima Clerk Pam Hookstead’s election operation is a well-oiled machine. She comes to the polls at 6 a.m., a pot of cowboy beef stew in hand to warm up for her poll workers, and takes a backseat as she lets the town’s longtime staffers settle into their rhythm. Having run well over 100 elections, administering the Wisconsin Supreme Court race on April 7 in the 1,200-person town felt like second nature. Hookstead, now 65, has spent three decades in the role — a depth of experience many towns have lost since 2020. Twenty miles south sits Clinton, where 59-year old Town Clerk Shannon Roehl-Wickingson was administering her first election on her own. It will take years for her muscle memory to rival Hookstead’s. But, she may get there faster than many of her peers in Wisconsin — or across the country. Rock County has a support and training system that most new clerks can only dream of. Read Article

National: The Fight to Protect the Midterms | Michael Waldman/Brennan Center for Justice

Last week, President Trump signed an executive order purporting to upend mail voting. It’s jarring that the administration would target something so popular. According to a Pew Research Center poll, more than one in three voters cast ballots by mail in 2024. Trump himself votes that way. As Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-MT) put it, “The reality is in a state like Montana, like Alaska, like other rural states, most of our people vote by mail. And they like it, and they trust it.” The order instructs the U.S. Postal Service to refuse to deliver ballots unless the voters are on a list of approved citizens that would be created by the executive branch. Such federal databases are out of date and unreliable, so this risks mass disenfranchisement of eligible citizens. The order is also illegal. The Constitution is clear: States run elections. Congress can pass national legislation. Presidents have no lawful role. Read Article

Trump’s election order, SAVE Act, rely on ‘flawed’ system | Joe Fisher/UPI

President Donald Trump’s multipronged plan for ensuring only eligible citizens vote in elections leans on a system that experts say is flawed. Pamela Smith, CEO and president of Verified Voting, told UPI the SAVE system’s errors were frequent enough to potentially impact some election results. “Some researchers found that more than 5% of the voters that the SAVE database had identified as noncitizens were actually citizens,” Smith said of SAVE errors in Texas. “Five percent is a big number. That’s well over the margin of victory in lots of situations. In some of the smaller counties that percentage became much higher.” Trump’s election order, SAVE Act, rely on ‘flawed’ system – UPI.com

National: At Los Angeles ‘shadow hearing’ on elections, House Democrats join experts to defend voting systems | Kevin Rector/Los Angeles Times

House Democrats and a panel of elections experts expressed unwavering confidence in state voting systems and dismissed Trump administration claims of widespread fraud and other vulnerabilities during a special “shadow hearing” in Los Angeles on Tuesday. They accused President Trump and his Republican allies of pushing sweeping federal reforms — including stricter voter ID laws and new restrictions on voting by mail — that would disenfranchise millions of eligible Americans, especially low-income, rural and elderly voters, as well as voters of color and those with disabilities. “They are taking us backward, and not to a good place,” said Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco), who helped lead the hearing at the Daniel K. Inouye National Center for the Preservation of Democracy in Little Tokyo. Read Article

National: Trump is trying to build a massive voter database. Election officials are afraid of what he’ll do with it | Gabe Cohen, Tierney Sneed, Jeremy Herb and Fredreka Schouten/CNN

The Trump administration is intensifying its campaign against alleged voter fraud, taking new steps toward building a national citizen database and ramping up its hunt for suspected noncitizen voters — all under the banner of “election integrity.” The latest escalation — including an executive order, a newly empowered prosecutor and a growing raft of lawsuits — has drawn fresh warnings from critics who say the administration’s push to amass vast troves of voter data from across the country could be used to block eligible Americans from voting and stoke fresh doubts about the legitimacy of the 2026 midterm elections. The Justice Department has finalized a deal with the Department of Homeland Security to give DHS sensitive voter-roll data the administration has demanded from states to be checked against a citizenship verification program that has been criticized for its inaccuracies. Trump officials last week floated a new potential pressure tactic on states that so far have refused to hand over their full voter rolls: Conditioning hundreds of millions of dollars in homeland security grants on sharing voter data, requiring states to run their registration rolls through the federal immigration records system or lose the funding. Read Article

National: Trump proposes cutting CISA election security program in FY27 budget | David DiMolfetta/Nextgov/FCW

TThe Trump administration is hoping to eliminate roughly $700 million in programs across the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency in fiscal year 2027, a sweeping set of cuts that translate to a net reduction of about $360 million after accounting for internal transfers and other adjustments, according to a detailed budget justification. The proposal targets election security, workforce development, stakeholder engagement and a range of infrastructure protection efforts, marking one of the most significant overhauls of the nation’s civilian cyber defense agency since its creation. The budget would notably eliminate CISA’s election security program entirely, including cutting funding for information-sharing support to state and local officials and removing dedicated election security advisors across the country. The proposal would also end CISA’s support for the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center, or EI-ISAC, a key hub for sharing threat intelligence, cyber alerts and incident response resources with state and local election officials. Read Article

National: Preparing for the Real Risks of Election Interference | Carl Smith/Governing

In February, allies of President Trump began circulating a 17-page draft executive order declaring a national emergency and granting the president unprecedented powers over voting — including the power to ban mail ballots, require IDs to vote and other changes. The basis for the order was a claim that China interfered in the 2020 election — an assertion that U.S. intelligence has said is not credible. The president later told reporters he was not considering the executive order, which would have almost certainly become mired in court challenges. President Trump has never conceded defeat in the 2020 election, but investigations have never turned up evidence of widespread fraud or of foreign interference in the technical aspects of the voting process. Still, foreign interference in U.S. elections is a real threat. U.S. intelligence has repeatedly reported that countries like Russia and Iran have attempted to influence U.S. election outcomes. A 2021 intelligence report found that China considered interfering in the 2020 election, but did not follow through. Read Aricle

National: How the Supreme Court could upend the midterm elections | Richard L. Hasen/MS Now

Pending before the Supreme Court are three disparate cases, each with the potential to remake rules on district boundaries, campaign finance and the eligibility of certain mail-in ballots. These rulings, issued in the middle of the election season, could potentially confound voters, scramble overworked and threatened election administrators, and alter campaign strategies in the middle of heated election contests. And depending on how the justices rule, these decisions may have cascading effects including new court challenges, legislative changes and even more uncertainty in the months before the midterms. The justices can avoid this confusion entirely. In June 1964 the court issued a landmark decision in Reynolds v. Sims that helped cement the principle of “one person, one vote.” Yet the ruling made clear that it need not be applied to that fall’s fast-approaching elections. Whatever this court ultimately decides on the merits in these cases, it should apply the same principle. Read Article

National: Supreme Court remade by Trump ushers in historic defeats for civil rights | Justin Jouvenal/The Washington Post

The sharply conservative Supreme Court that President Donald Trump’s three appointees remade is the first since at least the 1950s to reject civil rights claims in a majority of cases involving women and minorities, according to a detailed analysis conducted for The Washington Post. The shift brings to an end a streak of successive courts expanding such protections that began with the dawn of the civil rights era. But the historic nature of the current court is also evident in other key areas of the law over the five terms since the third of Trump’s appointees joined the bench. The analysis shows that in addition to civil rights, the court powered by Trump’s picks — Justices Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — has pushed to the right of any modern court on religious rights and voting issues. The court has also entered a new era of extreme partisanship. None over the past seven decades has been as starkly polarized. Read Article

National: ‘A logistical nightmare.’ Experts explain Trump’s mail-in ballot order | Josh Meyer/USA Today

“The EO is a logistical nightmare and clearly represents magical thinking – leaving aside constitutional issues,” said Charles Stewart III, the director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Election Data and Science Lab. “What’s important to note is that the federal system doesn’t have reliable and unique information about people on voter rolls,” Stewart told USA TODAY. To create such a vetted list, he said, would require mashing together many existing federal government databases – including from the Social Security Administration and the notoriously inaccurate Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) – that already have established problems even before anyone tries to combine them. Such an undertaking could take years, Stewart said, and require at the very least establishing pilot programs, creating and “debugging” entire new databases, getting congressional and public input – and, importantly, obtaining and spending a lot of federal funding. “If one were genuinely serious about implementation,” he said, “one would need not just rules but project management, funding streams, intergovernmental agreements, vendor capacity, testing cycles and a hierarchy for resolving conflicts between federal data, state voter files, and local election deadlines.” Read Article

Alaska: Anchorage election officials push back on ‘misleading’ claims about its mobile voting system | Sabrina Bodon and Bella Biondini/Anchorage Daily News

A company that’s been touting Anchorage’s mobile voting use has been told to stop. The Municipality of Anchorage in March sent a cease-and-desist letter to the Mobile Voting Project and its founder, Bradley Tusk, asserting the company has misrepresented the city’s mobile voting. As the municipality prepares for its April 7 election, it has had to contend with what its attorneys have called “false and misleading statements about the Municipality’s voting technology that risk undermining voter confidence in the integrity of our elections,” according to the cease-and-desist letter dated March 11. The New York Times on Nov. 13 published an article titled “Will People Trust Voting by Phone? Alaska Is Going to Find Out,” referring to Anchorage’s use of mobile voting as an “experiment with internet voting in local elections, betting that its ease and security will win over voters even in an era of election conspiracy theories.” The article prominently featured venture capitalist Tusk and the Mobile Voting Project. Municipal Clerk Jamie Heinz released a swift response to the article that evening, saying it was “an egregious misrepresentation of MOA Elections.” Heinz said the article made it seem like voting options had changed and that the municipality mainly uses mobile voting. Read Article

Arizona: Apache County will use vote center model after years of concern over ballot rejections on Navajo Nation | Sasha Hupka/Votebeat

After years of lobbying by tribal officials, Apache County will move to a new voting model for the upcoming midterm election, a shift expected to reduce the number of tribal voters’ ballots rejected because they were cast in the wrong precinct. The county, located in the remote, northeastern corner of Arizona, oversees voting in large swaths of the Navajo Nation and the Fort Apache Indian Reservation. For years, it has used a precinct-based model in which voters are assigned polling places based on the voting district, or precinct, in which they reside. But tribal voters often don’t have standard street addresses, and county, precinct, and reservation lines often crisscross. That means a voters’ assigned polling place may not be the closest or most intuitive location, and the vast distances and lack of transportation on tribal land mean it often isn’t easy to redirect voters to the correct site. Read Article

California Supreme Court halts GOP sheriff’s voter fraud investigation | Jane C. Timm/NBC

The California Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco to pause his investigation into alleged fraud in last year’s special election. “To permit further consideration of this petition for review, real parties, their agents, employees, and anyone acting on their behalf are hereby ordered to pause the investigation into the November 2025 special election and preserve all seized items,” the court wrote, while agreeing to review the case itself. Bianco, a Republican who is running for governor in California, seized more than 650,000 ballots from election officials last month, saying he was investigating potential fraud in the special election. The sheriff said at the time that a group of citizens said they believed they’d found irregularities after they conducted their own “audit” of the results in Riverside County. Read Article

Load more