North Dakota has an exemption in the SAVE Act but questions remain as Senate debate continues | Mary Steurer/North Dakota Monitor

State officials have said a controversial election security bill in Congress wouldn’t impact North Dakota, but some voting rights advocates in the state raise concerns that it could make it more difficult for some people to vote. The SAVE America Act would require voters to present valid photo ID to vote in federal elections, and proof of citizenship to register. The proposal has broad support among Republicans, including North Dakota’s congressional delegation. Critics oppose the bill on the grounds that it would expand federal control over elections and could make it harder for some to vote. It’s currently being debated in the Senate. The legislation includes an exemption for North Dakota since it’s the only state without voter registration, though it would still require North Dakota to have a system for verifying the citizenship of its voters. The SAVE America Act doesn’t say anything about what this process must look like. SAVE Act contains exemption for North Dakota voters, but questions remain as Senate debate continues • North Dakota Monitor

National: Republican states are pushing through their own versions of the SAVE America Act | Andrew Howard/Politico

As the Senate continues to stall on the SAVE America Act, Republicans in a number of states are moving forward with plans to add citizenship requirements to their voting laws. Six states are likely to vote on new measures this fall that echo President Donald Trump’s top legislative priority. Republican lawmakers in Arkansas, Kansas, South Dakota and West Virginia have put various citizenship-related amendments on the ballot. In West Virginia, the most recent state to put a measure on the ballot, the amendment would change the state’s constitution from saying “citizens of the state shall be entitled to vote,” to “only citizens of the state who are citizens of the United States are entitled to vote.” Read Article

National: Some States Already Preparing for Potential Supreme Court Ban on Late Ballots | Nick Corasaniti/The New York Times

Francisco Aguilar, the secretary of state in Nevada, stepped out of the Supreme Court in Washington on Monday, where justices had just heard arguments about the legality of counting mail votes that arrive after Election Day. He immediately called his top deputy. The court’s conservative majority had appeared deeply skeptical of the arguments for continuing the practice. So Mr. Aguilar’s message was urgent, he later said in an interview. He began listing things “we need to start working on and answering.” And in the middle of the midterm election season, they couldn’t wait for a decision to land — perhaps as late as June. “We have to provide a road map for the county clerks,” he said into the phone. Mr. Aguilar, a Democrat, is one of 18 top election officials in states and territories across the country bracing for the possibility that the Supreme Court will require major changes to election law just months before the midterm election in November. Part of the urgency: getting the message out to voters that late-arriving ballots may no longer be counted. Such a decision could affect hundreds of thousands of voters. Read Article

Mississippi Secretary of state’s push to use unverified addresses from credit agency for ‘election integrity’ left some legitimate voters inactive during primaries | Madeline Nguyen/Mississippi Today

For the last 12 years, Thomas Minor has never missed a single election — local, state or federal. It’s his way of making sure he has a say in the place he’s called home his whole life: Itawamba County. Over the years, he’s cast his ballot for candidates across the political spectrum. But in Mississippi’s latest election — the March 10 congressional primaries — he didn’t end up voting at all. When Minor showed up to the polls, he found his name missing from the poll book. His voting status had changed to inactive. A couple days later, he learned it was all because of an error that was never supposed to happen. Unverified credit data knocked legitimate voters off rolls for primaries – Mississippi Today

National: On cyber, local elections officials are ‘natural risk managers,’ says former CISA official | Colin Wood/StateScoop

Geoff Hale got his start in defending the nation’s elections infrastructure from cyberattacks in 2016. “I guess I can thank Russia for that,” he said, pointing to his work at the National Protection and Programs Directorate, which was two years later to be transformed into the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, the Department of Homeland Security division granted an expansive remit on coordinating and rallying technical and intelligence resources in response to cybersecurity threats, foreign and domestic. He recalled Russia’s successful cyberattacks in 2016 against the Democratic National Committee, but also lesser known cyber activity aimed at state governments. Much has changed over the past decade, including the level of support offered by the federal cyber agency created during Donald Trump’s first presidency. Federal support for state and local governments has been slashed broadly, including for programs that would aid local election officials as they prepare for the midterm elections and the 2028 presidential race. Read Article

Virginia governor moves to secure elections, rejoin ERIC | Lyra Bordelon/Staunton News Leader

Gov. Abigail Spanberger issued an executive order focused on securing Virginia voter’s ballots on Tuesday, March 24. The order makes a few changes, such as getting the state to rejoin a multi-state voter database, requiring any systematic removal of voters from the rolls be completed 90 days before an election, and requiring the state’s top elections official to certify that election security measures now in place are still in place each year. “I know it feels like it is always election season in Virginia,” said Spanberger in a press release on the executive order. “With even more days of voting on our calendar this year, I’m acting early to strengthen Virginia’s transparent, robust voting process and protect the rights of all eligible Virginia voters. The actions Virginia is taking today are not only critical to allowing all eligible Virginia voters to register and cast their ballot, but to making sure that only Virginians who are eligible to vote are able to vote in our Commonwealth – this year, and in every election into the future.” Read Article