The news is fairly light today so be sure to read the public comments on the Future of Voting in California now posted at the CA SOS website. The comments come from experts, advocates, interested citizens and also voting vendors including internet voting vendors…
ES&S Diebold Purchase: Groups Endorse Remedies for Unlawful Concentration of Market Power… In NM, the house has voted to contributions from lobbyist, the bill now heads to the senate…. Voting to become easier for Alabama service members….
All this and more in today’s news below….
AL: New bill would expand absentee voting options (next to state senate)
The bill would allow service members to file requests for absentee ballots by e-mail or fax. Currently, the requests must be made by U.S. Postal Service. It also would allow for the ballots to be sent to the service members by e-mail or fax, as well as U.S. Postal Service.
CA: ACLU of Northern California Opposes “Top-Two Open Primary”
CA: Breaking News: Federal District Court Issues Important Split Decision in San Diego Campaign Finance Case
CA: Battle lines form over electronic signatures to qualify ballot initiatives
…But hours after Chief Elections Officer Warren Slocum announced Tuesday that he would reject any electronic signature scribbled on an iPhone’s touch screen, the founders of a Silicon Valley start-up company said they would file a lawsuit this week challenging the rejection.
“I think that until it’s clear that this kind of technology can’t be tampered with, hard copy signatures should be the way to go,” Smith added. “I don’t think we’re clear on that point.” (Pam Smith, President of Verified Voting)
CT: ES&S Diebold Purchase: Groups Endorse Remedies for Unlawful Concentration of Market Power
NC: City feeling pressure to change its election system
Settlemyer and City Manager Sally Sandy drove home the point when they said Morganton’s alone-in-the-state status running its own municipal election could cost $25,000 to $30,000 or more for new hardware
Today, no N.C. city has its own board of elections — except Morganton. An increasing number of people are asking why.
NM: House votes to ban contributions from lobbyists, contractors
Bill bans contributions to candidates and political parties
VA: Virginia Election Officials Sued for Unlawfully Denying Access to Voter Files
VA: Election Law Society Symposium! March 18, 2010
(William & Mary) The Election Law Society is proud to announce its fourth annual Election Law Symposium, “Back to the Drawing Board: The 2010 Census and the Politics of Redistricting.”
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
The letter strongly warns of profound risks to national security when one vendor controls the programming and maintenance of the election equipment in a 70% majority of election jurisdictions or entire states. Centralization of voting system programming and maintenance increases the possibility of widespread election failure, the experts warn, which could have the potential to de-stabilize the Nation and could present a threat to U.S. national security.
“Poll: Large majority opposes Supreme Court’s decision on campaign financing”
Voting News by Joyce McCloy.
Archives here at http://votingnews.blogspot.com/
Subscribe to Voting News at this link:
To assist with Daily Voting News, please send links to news articles to us at email@example.com
“The Voting News is a free service made possible in part by support from Verified Voting Foundation. You can help support the Voting News by sending a check to Verified Voting Foundation, PO Box 4104, Carlsbad, CA 92018. Be sure to note “for Voting News” in the memo line of your check! Your contribution is tax deductible to the extent permitted by law.”
Donate online at this link: http://tinyurl.com/donate-vn
Disclaimer: Articles and commentary included in “Voting News” do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors of Voting News,or its allied organizations. Articles are selected for inclusion to inform subscribers’ability to draw their own conclusions based on noteworthy and credible news,research, legislation, and debate bearing on the integrity of elections.