If this state had an official color, it would most certainly be red. Football fans here don scarlet sweatshirts each game day, red meat is a dietary staple and, for decades, Republican presidential candidates filled Nebraska’s borders on the electoral map with their party’s hue. But in 2008, a Nebraska quirk injected a drop of blue into that sea of red, in the form of a single, lonely electoral vote for the Democratic presidential candidate. Nebraska is one of just two states, along with Maine, that do not award all their electoral voters to the statewide winner. And that meant that in 2008, Barack Obama picked up an electoral vote from the congressional district around Omaha, even as Senator John McCain trounced him across the rest of the state. One electoral vote — out of five in Nebraska and 538 nationally — might seem trivial, but Republicans do not see it that way. It was the first time since Lyndon B. Johnson beat Barry Goldwater in 1964, when Mr. Obama was a toddler, that the state awarded any votes to a Democrat. So this year, a longstanding proposal to change the state’s Electoral College system to winner-take-all may finally reach the Republican governor’s desk, amid a renewed push by conservative lawmakers hoping to have new rules in place for the 2016 presidential election. “It’s obvious that the majority of citizens of the state of Nebraska are Republicans,” said J. L. Spray, the state Republican Party chairman. “They want to have the maximum voice in the Electoral College.”
Democrats, not surprisingly, are fighting back. State party leaders have accused their Republican counterparts of shying away from competition, and are lamenting a possible return to presidential campaigns in which no candidates visit Nebraska because Democrats stand little chance for even a partial victory. Vince Powers, the state Democratic chairman, said Republicans were “saying this is the year we can deny our constituents of the right to be relevant in a national election.”
“It’s obvious that the majority of citizens of the state of Nebraska are Republicans,” said J. L. Spray, the state Republican Party chairman. “They want to have the maximum voice in the Electoral College.”
Democrats, not surprisingly, are fighting back. State party leaders have accused their Republican counterparts of shying away from competition, and are lamenting a possible return to presidential campaigns in which no candidates visit Nebraska because Democrats stand little chance for even a partial victory.
Full Article: Blue Dot for Obama Prompts Red Nebraska to Revisit Electoral College Rules – NYTimes.com.